- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:20 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:20 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 2:47 pm to John Barron
First you bragged about almost taking over a village of 488 people, and then you brought up another little place that you took over in 2024, and lost it only to come close to getting it back this week.
Now you are bragging about shooting down two drones?
Are you running out of material?
Now you are bragging about shooting down two drones?
Are you running out of material?
Posted on 5/7/25 at 3:47 pm to doubleb
quote:
Are you running out of material?
He does what he is told to do
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:17 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 5:19 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 6:47 pm to doubleb
quote:
Now you are bragging about shooting down two drones
Maybe they could train the fellas in kiev, seems they need a little help.....
Posted on 5/7/25 at 6:51 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
Maybe they could train the fellas in kiev, seems they need a little help.....
Train them to operate drones? The Ukes don’t need that,
Train troops. Yes, Ukraine needs help doing that, but Russia would be the last one to ask. They don’t train their own.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 8:03 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:17 pm to John Barron
ISW Update May 7 2025
quote:
Key Takeaways:
US officials acknowledged Russia's continued intransigence toward any ceasefire agreement in Ukraine while reiterating that Ukraine remains committed to US President Donald Trump's proposed comprehensive 30-day ceasefire.
Ukrainian forces likely recently advanced across the international border into southern Tetkino, Kursk Oblast, amid continued limited Ukrainian attacks in the area.
Ukrainian forces conducted long-range drone strikes against defense industrial facilities and airbases in Russia overnight on May 6 and 7.
Russian authorities will likely test their ability to completely disconnect large areas of Russia from the internet on May 9 under the guise of protecting Russian Victory Day celebrations.
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro signed the Russia-Venezuela Strategic Partnership and Cooperation Agreement on May 7.
Ukrainian and European officials continue to report on Russian executions of Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) in violation of international law and Russia's use of chemical weapons in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), to which Russia is a signatory.
Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to reject Chechen Republic Head Ramzan Kadyrov’s recent request to resign from his post.
Russian forces recently advanced near Vovchansk, Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, Novopavlivka, and Velyka Novosilka.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:10 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:12 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:55 pm to John Barron
quote:
razilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has arrived in Moscow ahead of the 80th Anniversary Victory Daycommemorations.
Current commies meeting former commies looking for brotherhood.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:02 am to DakIsNoLB
quote:
They only need to strike Russian missile targets in the name of war crimes. Drones are not being used against civilian targets, so I heard.
Putin stupidly strikes civilian targets which is really a waste of munitions and it only pisses off the Ukrainian population even more.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:03 am to Lee B
quote:
Moscow’s intelligence services are recruiting civilians, including the young and vulnerable, to carry remotely detonated explosives
They must be using Iranian advisers.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 12:05 am to John Barron
Firehose propaganda bot or just an idiot on a spam farm?
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:06 am to StormyMcMan
Interesting statement on changes coming from the White House in regards relations with the Europeans. TLDR: Trump having his mind changed due to US defense industry losing the hundreds of billions in new EU defense spending. Europeans are not intimidated by the Trump threats and are happy to produce these weapon systems themselves.
When the US defense industry needs strategic planning from Washington, what they get is chaos and monumental tariffs.
When the US defense industry needs strategic planning from Washington, what they get is chaos and monumental tariffs.
quote:LINK
I had ringside seats for US Vice President JDVance ’s speech this morning [May 6] in Washington. Like most people in the room I was prepared to be hit with another lecture, to see the fractures in the transatlantic relationship deepen before my eyes. But we were surprised, positively.
The tone has altered. JD Vance now considers Europe and the US to be important partners. So what exactly changed, and why?
My best bet is that what has happened during recent months could be described as US foreign policy disruption overreach. Fundamentally, the notion that America, in the spirit of Silicon valley disruptors, can offer a new and universally accepted worldview is based on the indispensability of the United States to other nations.
And what just happened was a reckoning that the US is still a tremendously important western ally, but… the worldview that it wants its allies to accept is simply not acceptable to most of them.
JD Vance offered a couple of points that to my mind show the main vulnerabilities of the US.
1—EU procurement of US weapons. The US wants a piece of the trillions of euros that will be spent on defence. And the administration is upset that Europe seems to be choosing to replace American products by making its own kit instead of staying weak and vulnerable by shopping around for subtier alternatives. All the messaging throughout recent months led Europe to doubt that the US is a reliable partner when it comes to dealing with the greatest security threat—Russia. And if Europe doubts that partnership—Europe is not going to spend money on US equipment, at least not in the amounts it planned to when there was less doubt. You cannot have cake and eat it. Either the US is ready to defend Europe against Russia together with Europe (and that includes Ukraine), or Europe slowly, ineffectively but inevitably will start building itself up, and with that will gain autonomy and leverage.
2—EU regulation. JD Vance mentioned that the way Brussels treats US tech companies is unfair. My gut feeling is that this sentiment is at the heart of the attack on Brussels by the US administration. You can laugh, despise or criticise Brussels, but it wields enormous regulatory power in an extremely populous and rich market. And if you want to reach that market, your road leads through Brussels.
And what's even more horrifying from the US administration’s perspective—most Europeans actually appreciate this regulation. Many have a sense it makes their life safer and in that way better. So the attacks on Brussels because of its supposedly undemocratic nature are simply another attack on any limitation of Washington’s power. You can broligarch your way to the highest echelons of US power, but apparently that doesn’t help you change things in Europe.
I admit, this might be wishful thinking—but I get the sense that Trump burning all those burning bridges did not scare or paralyze Europe into submission. And the price that American people are paying for the disruption might also be larger than initially expected.
If all this is true—the lesson is clear. Hold your ground, stay firm, keep the door open, remind everybody of common values and common interests and continue doing the right thing. And who knows, people can come around, so maybe countries can as well.
So I left the room hoping that my gut feeling will turn out to be true. At least, for once, my gut feeling was not gloom.
But still, the first victim of Trump’s disruption was trust. It is a very expensive commodity that was built up through decades of hard work and it will be very tough to regain. Trust will have to be at the core of all the conversations between Brussels and DC—be it about trade, regulation or security.
If there had been a chance to address the Vice President, I would have told him frankly:
Russia is the aggressor.
Ukraine is the victim.
We support the victim.
There are red lines that Europe cannot cross, and will not cross.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:46 am to Coeur du Tigre
Ok, this is from a Russian economist, but it adds perspective on that economy at this time.
Percent of GDP here is a pre-war stat, useless at this time. Nothing is pertinent except the 'liquid portion'.
Always good advice.
LINK
quote:
How bad is Russia’s war chest? Has the country entered stagflation? Why does it fear falling oil prices, but not a crash? And how is the tariff war hurting Russia?
These questions — and more — are explored in a special interview with Russian economist Vladimir Milov.
quote:
Tariff wars: China’s economic slowdown has closed its market to many Russian products, hitting major industries hard. The China-focused Russian coal industry is struggling, and Russian non-energy and non-commodity exports are down by about a quarter compared to pre-2022 levels
quote:
Tariff war will obviously exacerbate the Chinese slowdown. The slower Chinese growth, the less market for Russian goods. Share of China in the total Russian exports is as high as a third now - we're heavily dependent on this market and its well-being.
quote:Except you are forgetting about US domestic consumption... ?
Oil prices: The biggest loser from the falling oil prices is not Russia, and not OPEC - it's the U.S. shale oil industry. Oil production costs in the U.S. are higher. This means that, if global oil prices fall below $50, part of the U.S. oil production will be wiped off
quote:Except for that pesky $70/Bbl breakeven for the Russian budget. Oil prices can stay below $60 for far longer than Putin can remain solvent.
Russian oil companies can manage under $30-40, but the state budget will suffer. Putin and his allies believe they can endure low prices, anticipating a recovery. If oil stays at or below $50, it would likely be short-lived, which would please Putin.
quote:
In these circumstances, I'd say the best scenario is if the international oil prices stay somewhere around $60. Given the sanctions-driven discounts, that means Russian oil is cheaper than $50. These are the prices that will significantly hurt Russia
quote:
Employment: Russia continues to face high hidden unemployment, with many workers nominally employed but on unpaid leave or downtime. Rosstat estimated hidden unemployment at 4.7 million in Q4 2024, or over 6% of the workforce. This brings the total to about 9%
quote:
National Wealth Fund (NWF) As of April 1st, the liquidity portion of NWF was $39 billion, lower than the 2024 federal budget deficit of RUR 3.5 trillion. The 2025 deficit is expected to be higher, with rising costs and declining revenues due to falling oil prices and slowdown
Percent of GDP here is a pre-war stat, useless at this time. Nothing is pertinent except the 'liquid portion'.
quote:
Already now, non-oil revenue [i.e., taxes] in Q1 2025 grew only by 11% year-on-year, against 26% growth in 2024, and 18% planned growth for 2025. Of which VAT, by just 9%, as opposed to 22% in 2024 and 17% planned for 2025. A slowing economy generates fewer taxes
quote:
Inflation: Nothing is working except monetary emission — printing money. The government can’t borrow, as it’s cut off from international markets. Domestically, with OFZ bond yields above 16%, Russia spends more on debt servicing than it raises from the domestic market.
quote:
Authorities appear to tolerate inflation, with some State Duma members during the April 9th debate saying - "We're not Turkey or Argentina, so what difference does it make if inflation is 12-13% instead of 10%? Let’s print a couple of trillion rubles; no one will notice."
quote:
No question that filling the budgetary gap with printed money will lead to even higher inflation, which will destroy any prospect for economic recovery. So, basically, the Western sanctions are working - albeit not as fast as we hoped, but still.
quote:
Lifting sanctions: The U.S. alone won’t be able to reverse sanctions. Before the 2022 invasion, Europe was Russia’s key investor and trade partner: over 67% of the accumulated FDI stock came from Europe, and around 50% of Russian exports went there. For the US, 1% and 4%
LINK
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:53 am to Coeur du Tigre
quote:
… the worldview that it wants its allies to accept is simply not acceptable to most of them.
It is beyond ironic that Gabrielius Landsbergis would be a citizen of the USSR if it weren't for the US "worldview." The fact he so easily forgets that speaks volumes.
quote:Pushing the idea of Ukraine joining NATO was one such red line. Europe crossed it.
There are red lines that Europe cannot cross, and will not cross.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 7:11 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Pushing the idea of Ukraine joining NATO was one such red line. Europe crossed it.
A nation has to check a number of boxes to join NATO, Ukraine was never closer than a decade from joining.
It should be plain as the nose on your face that Russia was planning the 2014 invasion since at least 2007 once you know the moves it was making.
Popular
Back to top


2





