- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/15/23 at 7:56 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
The Rostov-on-Don was one of five subs in the Black Sea Fleet that can launch the Kaliber missiles that have devasted much of Odessa and southern Ukraine. Anyone saying that it's destruction is about generating headlines is really too stupid to bother responding to in the future. He's either brain-dead, or he's a troll.
It’s not gonna help the floundering Ukrainian offensive.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:03 pm to GOP_Tiger
WSJ:
Unfortunate news for Ukraine, as GLSDB had been expected to be delivered by next month:
Unfortunate news for Ukraine, as GLSDB had been expected to be delivered by next month:
quote:
Another long-range system the U.S. has said it would provide, the ground-launched small-diameter bomb with a range of about 90 miles, is months away from being transferred, officials said.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:06 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
s not gonna help the floundering Ukrainian offensive.
Comrade, if Mother Russia isn't sending cruise missiles via that sub, it helps Ukraine.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:07 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:outside of the massive intelligence network we have built and the collective power it has with the over 10 trillion dollars in GDP after you take the US out
that there was no reason for the US to remain in NATO.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:08 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Comrade, if Mother Russia isn't sending cruise missiles via that sub, it helps Ukraine.
It’s a nice little win for them for sure. But it’s not gonna move the needle on the ground.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:09 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
France and the UK have nuclear weapons.
How many do they have?
How many does Russia have?
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:09 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
outside of the massive intelligence network we have built and the collective power it has with the over 10 trillion dollars in GDP after you take the US out
We can remain economic partners without guaranteeing the security of the entire continent from a second rate military power.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:11 pm to doubleb
quote:
How many do they have?
I don’t know, but surely they could invest and build many more if they take their security seriously. The only reason they haven’t is because daddy has always been there to take care of them. Sure, they’d probably have to sacrifice some of their taxpayer provided healthcare and education but that’s their choice to make.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:12 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
And do what with our massive global intelligence network
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:17 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
It’s about 5000 active warheads for Russia plus in active yo about 500 fir France and England together.
The idea is to halt nuclear proliferation, why encourage France and England to build more?
It’s asking for trouble down the road.
The idea is to halt nuclear proliferation, why encourage France and England to build more?
It’s asking for trouble down the road.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:17 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
And do what with our massive global intelligence network
Maybe they could start doing actual intelligence work that they’ve been woefully inadequate at lately. They thought said it would take 3-6 months for Kabul to fall. They had no idea about any of the coups in Africa until after they had taken place. About the only thing they’ve gotten right is saying Russia would invade. Which isn’t impressive at all considering that everyone on the planet knew that Russia was going to invade. That tends to happen when you openly deploy hundreds of thousands of troops along a border. So kudos on stating the obvious I guess Mr. CIA.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:18 pm to doubleb
quote:
It’s about 5000 active warheads for Russia plus in active yo about 500 fir France and England together. The idea is to halt nuclear proliferation, why encourage France and England to build more? It’s asking for trouble down the road.
If the Europeans would rather not proliferate and build nuclear weapons that’s their business. I don’t really care. The thing about nukes is that 500 is plenty to take out Russia.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:23 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Figures
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:27 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
If the Europeans would rather not proliferate and build nuclear weapons that’s their business. I don’t really care. The thing about nukes is that 500 is plenty to take out Russia.
Err no and I’d rather they not build up. I wish we were the only ones to have nukes.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:31 pm to doubleb
quote:
Err no and I’d rather they not build up. I wish we were the only ones to have nukes.
Fine, if we have to pay for all of Europe’s defense then they should cede most of their sovereignty to us. We’ll pick their leaders and make their foreign and domestic policies and they can continue to ride around on trains and look at the pretty art that we protect for them.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:42 pm to RuLSU
quote:
big brain stuff
Or not. Definitely not.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 10:34 pm to TBoy
Thw World Bank is already financing rebuilding in Ukraine, just like it financed oil/gas in Russia post USSR. Even Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are chipping in ALREADY. Come on folks, remember that the electrical grid hasn't just been patched up but partly rebuilt to EU standards. It's more reliable now that pre 2022.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 11:40 pm to RLDSC FAN
*when* and I know you Ukraine bro military strategists can't f'n wait.
Posted on 9/15/23 at 11:50 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
ask this question: "Had Ukraine been in NATO, would Russia have attacked Ukraine?"
So, it's the US's job to police the world when the local regional powers (Western Europe) are completely capable of handling matters themselves? It's irrelevant what Russia would or would not have done depending on Ukraine's status with NATO. Western Europe can handle their own area. Russia is no threat to come storming through the Fulda Gap and subjugate the continent. They can barely get a ship out of harbor. So, again, what is the justification for US involvement and draining our Treasury?
Page 3239 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News