Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 5:41 pm to
When is pilot training slated to start? I heard it wouldn’t even begin until the end of the year.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45696 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

When is pilot training slated to start?


It has already started. Ukraine received and set up a F-16 simulator from the Czech Republic earlier this month and the 8 pilots with adequate English skills have started training on it.

quote:

I heard it wouldn’t even begin until the end of the year.




I believe that is the in aircraft part of the training which is supposed to start in Denmark and Romania.

quote:

Denmark's acting Defense Minister Troels Poulsen said in July that the country hoped to see "results" from the training in early 2024.
LINK

The first training site in Denmark is already operational it is just waiting on the Ukrainian pilots to finish simulator training. Denmark believes it can have its first patch of Ukrainian pilots trained by early 2024 which is consistent with the rumored 6 month training cycle. Setting up a second training center in Romania is where the delay is coming from because eastern european countries are not exactly known for doing things quickly.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 6:27 pm to
LINK

I posted this article a few days ago that says training won’t start until late this year or early next, mostly due to language barriers.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38224 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Is that why 20% of Ukraine is now Russia?


Well russia’s goal was 100 percent, but congrats on accomplishing 1/5 of your objective!

Also, half of that 1/5 was already in Russian hands before Putin invaded, so that’s even less of its ambitions that Russia has achieved ..

Also, Ukraine isn’t in NATO, so..

Should I keep going ?
This post was edited on 8/17/23 at 6:48 pm
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45696 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

I posted this article a few days ago that says training won’t start until late this year or early next, mostly due to language barriers.




My sauce(s) in the Ukrainian Air Force say that article is incorrect.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

NATO is as strong as ever


Is that why 20% of Ukraine is now Russia?


Lol. You idiot.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:15 pm to
Yeah but nato gave them like 150 pieces of heavy equipment get rekt
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21177 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Is that why 20% of Ukraine is now Russia?

Wasn't that number much higher, before getting NATO weapons
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:23 pm to
If we’re being honest, the only weapons that made a different are HIMARS, the one or two Patriot systems, stingers, and javelins.

All the expensive af MBT didn’t do shite
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21024 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:28 pm to
I agree with the basic message of those Russian accounts: Ukraine is deploying its reserves, so the Ukrainian tempo of advance and the pressure on Russian troops should increase. Could it be enough to force a breakthrough? It looks unlikely, but that's the kind of thing that would look unlikely -- until it happened.

But Serge is wrong in this:
quote:

The AFU needs to make their progress towards Tokmak by the end of September.

I don't know why Serge thinks the end of September is some magic date. The average first snow in Kherson is November 9th, and it's the snow cover on the ground (but without the ground being cold enough to freeze deeply) that creates the mud season.

In southern Ukraine, the offensive likely has until mid-November before conditions become very difficult for armored vehicles, and the offensive grinds to a halt, while some effects might be likely at the beginning of November.

So, the Ukrainian offensive likely has 75-90 days left to achieve strategic objectives. That's certainly a reasonable time for the new brigades to fight without rotation.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21024 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

If we’re being honest, the only weapons that made a different are HIMARS, the one or two Patriot systems, stingers, and javelins.

All the expensive af MBT didn’t do shite


If we're judging the Ukrainian offensive on the territory retaken, then it hasn't had much success yet.

But that's not the primary objective for the United States. What we want is the destruction of the Russian military, and on that score, Ukraine is making excellent progress.

The two Ka-52s that Ukraine took out today were just another example. Russia is rapidly running low on those.
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4156 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:36 pm to
That’s cool and I agree, I generally love dead Russians, but it feels slightly wasteful to give mbts without air support
Posted by LSUEnjoyer
Member since Aug 2023
63 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:42 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/18/23 at 7:15 am
Posted by OutsideObserver
Oceania.
Member since Dec 2022
784 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Well russia’s goal was 100 percent, but congrats on accomplishing 1/5 of your objective!

Also, half of that 1/5 was already in Russian hands before Putin invaded, so that’s even less of its ambitions that Russia has achieved ..

Also, Ukraine isn’t in NATO, so..

Should I keep going ?


The below details aren't very supportive of their opinion either if we want to look it purely in landmass gains.

Currently NATO has a 3.5x increase in landmass compared to Russia's since February 2022, with the potential for it to be 8.4x following Sweden's accession to NATO.

NATO Landmass prior to war: 26,791,742 km2

Accession of Finland Landmass increase: 338,145 km2 /NATO Landmass 1.25% increase:

Pending Accession of Sweden Landmass increase: 447,425 km2 /NATO Landmass 1.67% increase:

Total potential NATO Landmass increase: 785,570 km2 / 2.92%

Russia Landmass prior to war: 17,098,246 km2

Currently held Ukrainian Landmass taken: 59,363 km2 / 0.35% increase

Note:
Currently held territory does not include the areas held prior to February 2022 (Addition of these brings landmass gains to 102,617 km2 / 0.6% increase), or areas in the Oblasts Russia annexed but has not achieved control over.

Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4690 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:14 pm to
ISW Updates

quote:

Key Takeaways:

“Vostok” Battalion commander Alexander Khodakovsky suggested that Russia freeze the war in Ukraine along the current frontlines, reintroducing a narrative that had been largely dormant since Wagner Group financier Yevgeny Prigozhin’s armed rebellion.

Khodakovsky commands forces defending in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area and his comments about freezing the war follow the Ukrainian liberation of Urozhaine on August 16, suggesting that recent Ukrainian advances may be significantly weakening confidence in the Russian defense along the wider front in southern Ukraine.

Recent Ukrainian advances near small settlements in the Donetsk-Zaporizhia Oblast border area and in western Zaporizhia Oblast are likely tactically significant because of the structure of Russian defensive lines.

Russian forces have dedicated significant effort, resources, and personnel to hold settlements such as Robotyne and Urozhaine, and recent Ukrainian advances in these areas are therefore likely reflective of a wider degradation of defending Russian forces.

Russian efforts to ramp up the domestic production of Iranian Shahed-136/-131 drones indicates that Russia aims to develop the long-term capability to conduct large strike series in Ukraine.

Russian reports about the state of the Chonhar Bridge in occupied Kherson Oblast indicate that Ukrainian strikes disrupted a major Russian ground line of communication (GLOC) to Crimea for 11 days.

Russian forces conducted offensive operations along the Kupyansk-Svatove-Kreminna line, near Bakhmut, along the Avdiivka-Donetsk City line, and in the western Donetsk-eastern Zaporizhia Oblast border area on August 17 and advanced in certain areas.

Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations on at least three sectors of the front on August 17 and advanced near Bakhmut and in western Zaporizhia Oblast.
Posted by OutsideObserver
Oceania.
Member since Dec 2022
784 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

I agree with the basic message of those Russian accounts: Ukraine is deploying its reserves, so the Ukrainian tempo of advance and the pressure on Russian troops should increase. Could it be enough to force a breakthrough? It looks unlikely, but that's the kind of thing that would look unlikely -- until it happened.

But Serge is wrong in this:
quote:
The AFU needs to make their progress towards Tokmak by the end of September.

I don't know why Serge thinks the end of September is some magic date. The average first snow in Kherson is November 9th, and it's the snow cover on the ground (but without the ground being cold enough to freeze deeply) that creates the mud season.

In southern Ukraine, the offensive likely has until mid-November before conditions become very difficult for armored vehicles, and the offensive grinds to a halt, while some effects might be likely at the beginning of November.

So, the Ukrainian offensive likely has 75-90 days left to achieve strategic objectives. That's certainly a reasonable time for the new brigades to fight without rotation.


I think he is looking at it from the perspective that with Ukraine's lack of progress to date, if they have not made it to Tokmak by then they won't have made any meaningful gains and will possibly face losing Western support as this has been where his analysis has been trending since the start of the offensive.

So his ultimatum in terms of date is more around that than the actual time frame of when things will degrade to the point offensive operations are not possible.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21024 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

I thought this war was about protecting the sacred 1991 borders of Ukraine and muh democracy.


You should have paid attention. The US national interest in the war was always about weakening one of our greatest enemies. Most of us on this board understand that Russia represents a strategic military threat, and that this war is an outstanding opportunity to degrade that threat without the cost of the life of a single American military service member.

quote:

it's just about fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian


You stupid vatnik. Ukraine is asking the US for weapons to fight and destroy Russian military equipment, and we are doing that. It's not about us fighting Russia in any way, nor is the US causing the death of any Ukrainian by giving Ukraine weapons. US military support has actually saved the lives of many thousands of Ukrainians by intercepting the many rockets that your side points at their homes.

Please stay angry that your side can't kill more innocent Ukrainian civilians because of US military support. Cry more, please.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38224 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

I thought this war was about protecting the sacred 1991 borders of Ukraine and muh democracy. Now you tell me it's just about fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian. More brilliant foreign policy from the people who brought you the Kabul air lift.


Tell us more about Russia’s gloriously successful campaign to liberate 1/6 of Ukraine.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4690 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Appears that we have another groundstop at Vnukovo in Moscow after a probable Ukrainian drone attack on Moscow City.

Reports of explosions in Moscow City this morning.

TASS says that a UAV was downed in the city

LINK
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8131 posts
Posted on 8/17/23 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Russian forces have dedicated significant effort, resources, and personnel to hold settlements such as Robotyne and Urozhaine, and recent Ukrainian advances in these areas are therefore likely reflective of a wider degradation of defending Russian forces.

This is what Ukraine did with Kherson.

first pageprev pagePage 3162 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram