- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
When me and SFP submit almost verbatim posts at the same time

Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:02 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Saying that Ukraine can't make decisions as an independent nation because Putin will consider it escalation is like saying the US can't impose economic sanctions because Russia will consider it interference and a declaration of war.
We're almost there after yesterday.
People scared of a Russian response are 100% starting to put economic sanctions on the level of direct Western attack.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:02 am to Ingeniero
quote:
What that guy posted isn't some groundbreaking take. If anything, it's ignorant to the fact that this won't stop at Donbas. If Ukraine capitulates here it opens the door for their entire nation to become a puppet state. To think that they shouldn't resist, and that the international community isn't going to hit Russia with harsh sanctions for this, is silly.
I've never stated that they shouldn't resist. I'm just trying to point out the rationale behind both sides as well as point out what's a reasonable negotiation. If both sides say "All or nothing", then it's not much of a negotiation.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:03 am to upgrayedd
quote:
No, but you have to question why all those people would want a certain outcome.
Because it's the best outcome?
Do we, and other countries, effect regime change? Yes, all the time.
Do we have ulterior motives when effecting this change? Yes, all the time.
Do certain people become exceedingly wealthy with said changes? Sure...I would totally agree with that.
That said, do those changes generally help to stabilize a region? Yes, they do.
If anyone thinks being the leader of the free world doesn't come with having to make deals with less than altruistic leaders, then I don't know what fairy tales you have all read and what your expectations of the world are.
At the end of the day - wouldn't you prefer a country that is money laundering, as opposed to one that is talking about firing nukes off?
This post was edited on 2/28/22 at 8:05 am
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:03 am to Enzos Tiny Pito
quote:
Russian troops repeatedly tried to storm the outskirts of Kyiv. All movements were under control, columns of Russian equipment were destroyed. Invader suffered significant personnel losses, is demoralized and exhausted, - Kyiv Defense Commander
Ukraine better not give up anything in the peace talks. At this point they have the upper hand and Russia hasn’t earned anything
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who is supporting this move by Russia? I mean countries in the world?
Sometimes behavior is so abhorrent and against the norms that you get a united response. This is one of those examples.
Perhaps you're right. I just don't like when all those people agree and fiercely attack anyone who even tangentially strays from the hivemind narrative.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:05 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Ingeniero
quote:
When me and SFP submit almost verbatim posts at the same time
I had no idea you were black.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:08 am to RummelTiger
quote:
Do we, and other countries, effect regime change? Yes, all the time.
Do we have ulterior motives when effecting this change? Yes, all the time.
Do certain people become exceedingly wealthy with said changes? Sure...I would totally agree with that.
That said, do those changes generally help to stabilize a region? Yes, they do.
Come on, man. We quite literally forced a regime change in Ukraine in 2013/2014 and it led to this. That stabilized a region? I realize we'll disagree on some fairly minor things on the overall issue, but what you stated is just batshit.
I don't think we've stabilized a region through regime change this century.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:08 am to RummelTiger
Nah I'm a honkey. I guess this one of me and SFP is more melanin accurate:


Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:10 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I don't think we've stabilized a region through regime change this century.
Of course you don't.
quote:
That stabilized a region?
I did say "generally", not always...
Besides, if Putin wasn't such a bitch, then yes...it would've.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:11 am to RummelTiger
quote:
Of course you don't.
quote:
I did say "generally", not always...
Can you give me one or two?
Ukraine certainly isn't one
This post was edited on 2/28/22 at 8:12 am
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:11 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I just don't like when all those people agree and fiercely attack anyone who even tangentially strays from the hivemind narrative.
But there isn't really much substance outside of that "hivemind narrative". You have your standard "muh reasons" that can, but not always, devolve into basically Putin admiration. And then you get the shitty "What if Mexico and Russia devised a defensive pact" argument that ignores the very reason why there is still conflict in Eastern Europe (freedom of liberal democracies and free trade).
And you see the same 2-3 memes repeated over and over again while those people accuse anyone how supporting the 2-3 memes as wanting to send US troops to start a world-ending nuclear war.
First, there is the "muh 2014 coup" meme. I spent a long time yesterday with people trying to bring up 2014 as a justification for this war and there is literally no logic in that argument.
These same people also love to argue that this is a plot by "globalists" to keep their honeypot open (And Russia is not only justified, but noble in its fight against these "globalists". These same people have spoken for years about how Russia/Putin is a bastion of hope in their perceived fight against "globalists"). These people are also the ones who will "argue" that Russia isn't woke and our real enemy, the only one we should care about, are domestic woke twitter accounts.
Then you have the "muh nuclear war" excuses, which are now trying to include economic sanctions in with a real military response. I don't think there are that many people who want nuclear war, but when you move the line so much that basically ANY response to Russia's abhorrent behavior paves a path to that hell, then you're not arguing with any reason.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:12 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Ingeniero
I was joking, but that pic...
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:14 am to upgrayedd
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
I've never made any of those arguments, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. You've made the Ethan Klein metamorphosis big time.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:16 am to RummelTiger
quote:
For your research pleasure:
Again, like I said. This century.
So, that being said, which one of these stabilized the region?
quote:
6.2 2000s
6.2.1 2000: FR Yugoslavia
6.2.2 2001–2021: Afghanistan
6.2.3 2003–2011: Iraq
6.2.4 2006–2007: Palestinian Authority
6.2.5 2005–2009: Syria
6.3 2010s
6.3.1 2011: Libya
6.3.2 2012–2017: Syria
Surely you're not this dumb.
Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:18 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I've never made any of those arguments

Posted on 2/28/22 at 8:19 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Come on, man. We quite literally forced a regime change in Ukraine in 2013/2014 and it led to this. That stabilized a region? I realize we'll disagree on some fairly minor things on the overall issue, but what you stated is just batshit.
One of the problems is -- and I don't know which side is BS -- some people will say Yanukovych was illegitimate and installed by the Russians. The other side then says Poroshenko was illegitimate and installed by our coup. And around and around we go.
Popular
Back to top



1






