- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:02 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:02 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Can you link his exact quote?
Zelensky Interview Clip with Wolf Blitzer
Clip was the basis of the tweet I shared.
After watching the clip I’m sort of back to my original tweet I shared. He does say “could” lead to those cities but then does also say “open road”. I don’t think the OSINT tweet is really out of context as much as what Zelensky said can just be easily taken that way.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:04 pm to Chromdome35
Russia keeps throwing men into this meat grinder of a war. They’ll be over 300,000 KIA before the start of next year if the war keeps at this pace. Those are some jaw dropping stats.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:06 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Idk how regular Americans support this still.
IDK how any average American doesn't.
Military expenditures are incredibly expensive propositions; the goal of our military is to offset the strength of our enemies, and improve our own security situation in relation to them. Our primary antagonist of the last century is experiencing a bloodletting that combined with their demographic collapse, has essentially guaranteed they can never be a truly global threat to American security interests again, if they're not ceeded footholds- and we've done it for dimes on the dollars we've historically spent trying to prepare for conflict with them-- it may be the most cost effective American security endeavor in the last century.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:13 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:why not?
But why?
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:15 pm to BoardReader
At this point, we've helped destroy something like 60% of Russia's conventional military for about 8% of our normal defense budget -- all without any American lives lost.
We've also dramatically strengthened the NATO alliance (especially with the upcoming additions of Sweden and Finland).
Russia's defeat will also significantly hurt our other enemies, especially Iran and China. And it will stop Russia's provocations in Latin America that have lead to so much of our illegal immigration problems.
momentoftruth87, are you a Communist? Or do you wish that America had a dictator such as Putin? Those are really the only reasons to oppose American support of Ukraine.
We've also dramatically strengthened the NATO alliance (especially with the upcoming additions of Sweden and Finland).
Russia's defeat will also significantly hurt our other enemies, especially Iran and China. And it will stop Russia's provocations in Latin America that have lead to so much of our illegal immigration problems.
momentoftruth87, are you a Communist? Or do you wish that America had a dictator such as Putin? Those are really the only reasons to oppose American support of Ukraine.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:20 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
At this point, we've helped destroy something like 60% of Russia's conventional military for about 8%
Lol
quote:
momentoftruth87, are you a Communist? Or do you wish that America had a dictator such as Putin? Those are really the only reasons to oppose American support of Ukraine.
I don’t support either side GOP_Tiger. Why don’t you go fight the good fight?
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:21 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
Russia keeps throwing men into this meat grinder of a war. They’ll be over 300,000 KIA before the start of next year if the war keeps at this pace. Those are some jaw dropping stats.
There is more than most think to that 300K KIA number. I say that because the KIA tally is only one of three stats that make up the total casualty count when it comes to warfare. There’s also those who are WIA (wounded in action) and those who are MIA/POW (missing in action or prisoner of war).
As a general rule of thumb, the ratio of KIA to WIA and/or MIA/POW can be 3:1 or even as high as 10:1 compared to KIA. Now, having said that, I must point out that as far as I know we have no reliable number of wounded for either side in this war. But I will say, I’d think it a realistic estimate that when you combine the Russian tally of KIA with WIA and missing/captured, the total Russian casualty count has to be at least somewhere in neighborhood of 300K right now.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:27 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
At this point, we've helped destroy something like 60% of Russia's conventional military
Yeah I don’t buy that number at all.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:27 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
They’ll be over 300,000 KIA before the start of next year if the war keeps at this pace. Those are some jaw dropping stats.
Staggering. By comparison, 420k US soldiers died in WW2 and 58k in Vietnam. There has been a lot written about how this war is hastening Russia's demographic collapse.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:30 pm to Mr Happy
Lol they’ve increased their economy. If they had anywhere near the death you guys are claiming, their economy and total defense wouldn’t be as reported.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:30 pm to Chromdome35
I totally support Ukraine but those numbers seem really high.
Did they really lose twice as many troops as we did in Vietnam ?
Did they really lose twice as many troops as we did in Vietnam ?
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:33 pm to Napoleon
quote:
I totally support Ukraine but those numbers seem really high.
It’s the Kyiv Independent. Those numbers aren’t legit. It’s propaganda for the sake of Ukrainian citizen’s morale and to keep western appetite for support high.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:34 pm to tokenBoiler
quote:
I think we're up to week 3 now, of people giving Bakhmut 72 hours. That said, eventually, its likely to be true.
In the least surprising news of this month, we're now 72 hours past this observation, with Ukranians still in Bakhmut to some degree. Maybe we just need to bump that goalpost another 72 hours.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:35 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
No shite. If there was tragic loss of life like above, more ppl would know about it. The fact Ukrainians are asking for more and losing territory is all I need to know of how this is going and how tax payers are being bamboozled by this scheme
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:39 pm to momentoftruth87
Russia has always been a Paper Tiger bro. Sorry you don’t understand that. Putin has turned into a paper tiger on fire.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:41 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
At this point, we've helped destroy something like 60% of Russia's conventional military
quote:
Yeah I don’t buy that number at all.
No one has anything more than an educated guess. But I will say the fact Russia is pulling T-62 tanks out of mothballs speaks volumes to the level of losses they’ve sustained.
For some context, the T-62 was introduced in 1961. Sending these woefully obsolete tanks to the front is akin to the US pulling The original M-60, introduced two years prior to the T-62, from display at countless American Legion & VFW posts and small town war memorial parks…
…. and sending them into battle.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:50 pm to Darth_Vader
Does it really matter if Russia is using 62/72/92s? All are demonstrably easily enough destroyed by modern anti-tank weapons. At this point Russia is using the tank as a tracked mobile gun platform that can hopefully kill some Ukrainians before it gets blown up. The model is basically irrelevant.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:54 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Or they’re using old inventory and not prime troops as they capture Ukraine.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:55 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
I don’t support either side GOP_Tiger. Why don’t you go fight the good fight?
Mostly because of the same reasons that, when I tried to enlist in 2004, our military doctors decided that I was medically unfit to serve.
But also because Ukraine isn't asking you or me to fight. They have mostly asked for our old surplus equipment. When we send Ukraine our old M113s, that means that don't have to dispose of them by dumping them into the ocean. When we send them an old HAWK air defense system, then it no longer requires our expense of storing it in some warehouse. When we give them old ordinance, it saves us the expense of disposing it or recycling it.
That's why, when I said that our aid to Ukraine was 8% of the Pentagon budget ... it's really a lot less. We've given so little to Ukraine.
Posted on 3/7/23 at 9:57 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Or they’re using old inventory and not prime troops as they capture Ukraine.
Yes and no. It’s true that they’re relying heavily on conscripts and convicts to pull most of the heavy lifting but some of their best units like the 1st Guards Tank Army and their airborne VDV units have been heavily involved and suffered some of the biggest defeats of the war.
Popular
Back to top


0





