Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 12/27/22 at 6:57 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68567 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 6:57 pm to
It was basically me, sclibertarian, and goldennugget whining about the neocon strikes. The rest of the MAGAs loved it. Take from that what you will.

Sorry, guys, I try to stay out of this thread -- but, I jump in when I'm drunk.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150180 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

GEOTUS's
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20975 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Cleaning up corruption is what is required to be able to join the EU. They people there are tired of being piss poor Russian serfs, which is what they were before Maidan



After leaving communism 30 years ago, Poland is still one of the poorer countries in the EU -- 5th lowest in GDP per capita out of the 25 nations in the EU, at $18000.

Its neighbor Ukraine? Staying in the Russkiy Mir for as long as they did means that Ukraine's per capita GDP is less than a third of that, at $4836.

Yes, there's been lots of corruption. It's come from oligarchs, most of whom have had deep connections with Russia. A lot of that corruption has only been exposed during the war, like the stuff with Motor Sich. But this has been Ukraine's struggle since 2014: to free itself from Russian-caused corruption.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15790 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:07 pm to
WeeWee will appreciate this.

Suddenly there is a shortage of surgeons in Russia so any Russian MD can become a surgeon with 3 months training.

There were 406,000 immigrants from Russia to Kazakhstan from Sept 21 to Sept 30th.

Suddenly programmers/IT are short in St. Petersburg by about 100,000.

The Russian Space Agency LOST $50 billion rubbles (spelling intended) this year.

22 million new credit card holders in Russia where 30%-35% interest is charged on credit cards.

Meat and fish sales are down by 1/3

Since the sanctioned cap on insurance for crude oil cargo has begun, Russia has lost 54% of its exports. China's largest shipowner is refusing to carry Russian oil
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20975 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

I feel we are close to area of having to greatly increase our involvement and expenses or risk having a power vacuum in Russia that will create more problems than just letting Putin wilt away but able to keep Russia relatively stable. Parts of Russia or groups like inside Chechnya are probably chomping at the bit to start taking advantage of situation.


It's been very frustrating to people like me who want to see Ukraine win quickly, but the West has definitely doled out military aid slowly because of concerns about what would happen if Putin lost quickly.

Could warlords such as Prigozhin and Kadryov get their hands on nuclear weapons?

Even though I'll still mock him for the wuss that he is, it's concerns such as this that keep Macron on the phone with Putin, trying to get him to withdraw.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

This sounds more involved than we even are now. What’s the plan and our expense to avoid hardliners using economic crisis and chaos from regime change to eventually repeat what the Russians have always done or to start civil wars in places like Chechnya.



There's no path forward other than liberalization and integration with Europe proper. European Russia will likely remain stable, in a relative sense, because of the accumulated wealth, but the peripheral republics could go in any direction. Given Kadyrov's contacts in the Gulf, I'd suspect heavy Arab involvement in the Caucuses, which would just continue a pattern that started in the 90's. I think the instability that results from the possible regime change would mainly be internal, and might signal the end of the heavy, centuries long effort on the part of the Russian elite to centralize the entire country around Moscow.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39549 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Having said all that, I will 100% concede that most of the MAGAs would be supporting Trump if he also funded this proxy war.
100% bullshite. People are sick of pissing away billions in foreign affairs with nothing in return
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 7:39 pm
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38079 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:49 pm to
Umm you forgetting about me and honestly sfp too?
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20975 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 7:52 pm to
The scary truth is that many on the Right root for Putin precisely because he's a ruthless dictator. They see Russian soldiers with mass rapes of Ukrainian women, and they admire the brutality. They laugh when Russian businessmen "fall" out of windows. They smirk when dissidents mysteriously die of polonium poisoning.

In Lord of the Rings, Tolkien writes about the Black Numenoreans, who worshipped Sauron in the dark years. Those people used to mainly be on the Left, and there are still a lot of them -- people who see deplorables as subhuman, who want to control every aspect of others' lives, etc. But people are blind if they don't see the rise of a similar thought process on the Right.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30538 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

So, I follow a lot of the alt media guys. This Berletic dude gave a little primer that helped explain to ignorant people like me why it's going so slow. Military nerds, please feel free to rip him apart.


I watched the video and read 100 or so of the comments. The first thing I would say is I would love to debate him on the topic.

The first thing that struck me in the comments is how most of them have no idea how war is waged. This is clearly a blind spot of mine. It is easy to forget only 7% of Americans are veterans and many of those, like myself, are so far removed temporally that modern warfare has passed them by.

Second, I can't argue with his description of the battlefield via his whiteboard. It is a basic view of a defensive posture vs an invading force. This has been true for centuries, the only difference is the name of the weapon systems and the ranges at which they are effective. The ranges have obviously increased over time.

Finally, mainly because I don't want to type 10,000 words, is my main issue with the video is he fails to shine a light on the reason Russia is stuck in this city by city seige warfare. While he mentions Ukraines air defense he doesn't make the point that Russia made a huge blunder in not being able to achieve air superiority. Based on the size of the militaries and their respective budgets it is ridiculous that Russia could not overwhelm Ukraine's air defense and take it out allowing them to own the skies. Had this been done the war would have been over before this thread reached 200 pages aside from partisan actions. The transfer of air defense from the West has been too small to give Russia a pass on this 10 months in. Russia's utter failures both in planning and execution are why they are having to sit at range and hopefully degrade Ukraine enough to make an offensive. I will give him the benefit of the doubt that he was just trying to explain why Russia is moving so slowly but he makes it sound like it is going to plan for them and this is how most of his commenters took it.


One last thing, though I have the desire to say a lot more just not the will, something stuck out to me in the comments and that was how the Ukrainian military is using cities and their civilians as cover. I found this a little odd but I see the disconnect. Ukraine is being invaded so what does the invader want to take? Cities, because critical GLOC (ground lines of communication) usually converge in those areas. If the invader wants the cities you have to mount your defense in or in front of the cities. Sure Ukraine could set up in the middle of 1,000s of hectares of watermelon fields but Russia would just skirt them and head straight to the cities. As I said I forget how little the average person understands war and this is not knowledge limited to those in the military* anyone with a passing interest in war knows these things but I feel like they should be intuitive to anyone with a brain and a modicum of intellectual curiosity.

In the end, I didn't find a lot to argue with based on what he actually said. However, what he left out, purposefully I imagine, lead at least those commenting on his video to see a distorted view of reality, at least IMHO.


* lots of people that have been in the military do not know much about the big picture either truthfully. I for example mainly understand war from the brigade down at least as a military man. I have a far better grasp of war on a tactical level than at a strategic level. My first-hand experience in war was all as an infantry platoon leader and all my military experience was in the brigade and lower, a lot of people here have had experience far higher in the strategic level.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45586 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Can we take this political sewage back to the political board?



Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to click on this thread or read this thread.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30538 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

100% bullshite. People are sick of pissing away billions in foreign affairs with nothing in return


The difference of opinion here centers around "nothing in return". Some see nothing while others see the best ROI of any foreign aid in the last 30 years or so.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:15 pm to
That post just reached epic level douche.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45586 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

What’s the plan to avoid chaos in Russia?


The same answer to everything in Russia. More vodka!
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30538 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to click on this thread or read this thread.


While he was trying to keep politics out of the thread far before Chicken's edict upon tOT I think it is judicious to make a good-faith attempt to keep politics to a minimum. There are nearly daily threads on PT to discuss that area albeit with the drawbacks currently inherent in the forum.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39549 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

others see the best ROI of any foreign aid in the last 30 years or so.


Russia is no threat to the US whether they take Ukraine or not. They are weak as shite

But yes let’s give billions to a country with a long history of corruption. What could go wrong
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:20 pm
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45586 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

WeeWee will appreciate this.

Suddenly there is a shortage of surgeons in Russia so any Russian MD can become a surgeon with 3 months training.



Damn Russia better pray than none of the wives of Russian submarine captains need an appendectomy.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
5056 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

it is ridiculous that Russia could not overwhelm Ukraine's air defense and take it out allowing them to own the skies.
Is it plausible to think he didn't believe his planned blitzkrieg needed air superiority and he didn't want to damage airframes he wanted for Russia?

Edit: I was thinking 'air defense' as being fighters, and air superiority requiring them to be destroyed, either in the air or on the ground - I forget that missiles and rockets are everywhere on the modern battlefield.
This post was edited on 12/27/22 at 8:26 pm
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45586 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Russia is no threat to the US whether they take Ukraine or not.


They are a threat to the Baltic countries and those countries are NATO members. That means that Russian is indeed a threat to the USA because if Russia moves against Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania the USA is committed to war with Russia.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10628 posts
Posted on 12/27/22 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Kadryov get their hands on nuclear weapons?


The few times I have felt some camaraderie with Russia and Putin have been based on acts of terror by Chechen terrorists and preferring Russia take more control over Chechnya.

Muslim terrorists who can look so European were very concerning (and still are to a certain extent). This guy is just a terrorist whose family just flipped to supporting Putin for power and money. He is nuts and ruthless.

first pageprev pagePage 2272 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram