- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:15 pm to kengel2
quote:
His line of questioning is borderline retarded and if he keeps pushing it, he will prove that it was indeed self defense.
They did show the photo of Huber with the handgun at the trial, but they didn't show it on the TV feed I was watching.
The ADA made the point that it looked like Huber had his handgun down but Rittenhouse had his gun raised at Huber. Rittenhouse's response was that he didn't really have the gun aimed at Huber in the photo and that it was an angle issue with the camera.
Since they didn't show the photo, it was hard to judge. But if anyone has seen it, was Rittenhouse's response plausible?
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:16 pm to jfw3535
quote:
I don't what brownie points the prosecutor thinks he's making with this cross examination, but he's coming across as a total douchebag.
He’s embarrassing himself
He’s pretty much making the case for self defense
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:16 pm to LSUFan8719
quote:well besides the dumbass that pulled out his gun on Kyle and got his arm evaporated
It sounds like he was the only one there acting inappropriately that night.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:17 pm to jivy26
quote:
The fact that he is on trial with video evidence showing he acted appropriately, is terrifying.
The main problem Rittenhouse has is that he intentionally went hostile into a crowd armed with a deadly weapon. Why the frick was her there armed to kill? Then he did kill. Then members of the crowd went after him to try to stop an active shooter. So he shot them too.
While I can see that the kid was terrified, he created the deadly situation. This isn't so clean.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:18 pm to LSUFan8719
quote:
Hundreds of armed citizens there that night, yet Kyle is the only one that shot 3 people and murdered 2. It sounds like he was the only one there acting inappropriately that night.
How bad does it piss you off that one 17 year old kid with an AR just absolutely destroyed those degenerates?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:19 pm to TBoy
quote:
he intentionally went hostile into a crowd
He went in intentionally hostile? What evidence do you have he went in hostile?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:19 pm to TBoy
quote:
The main problem Rittenhouse has is that he intentionally went hostile into a crowd armed with a deadly weapon. Why the frick was her there armed to kill? Then he did kill. Then members of the crowd went after him to try to stop an active shooter. So he shot them too.
Imagine siding with a short pedophile.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm to TBoy
quote:
he main problem Rittenhouse has is that he intentionally went hostile into a crowd armed with a deadly weapon. Why the frick was her there armed to kill? Then he did kill. Then members of the crowd went after him to try to stop an active shooter. So he shot them too.
While I can see that the kid was terrified, he created the deadly situation. This isn't so clean.
You haven't watched 3 seconds of this trial, have you? Almost none of what you typed is accurate per everything presented in court.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm to t00f
Is this kid on trial for lying to a murderous mob? Seriously?
“You didn’t tell some random person the truth! Reeeeee!”
“You didn’t tell some random person the truth! Reeeeee!”
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm to TBoy
quote:
The main problem Rittenhouse has is that he intentionally went hostile into a crowd armed with a deadly weapon. Why the frick was her there armed to kill? Then he did kill. Then members of the crowd went after him to try to stop an active shooter. So he shot them too.
While I can see that the kid was terrified, he created the deadly situation. This isn't so clean.
2nd Amendment. Despite your animosity towards it and desire to get rid of it. It still exists.
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm to LSUFan8719
quote:
Hundreds of armed citizens there that night, yet Kyle is the only one that shot 3 people and murdered 2. It sounds like he was the only one there acting inappropriately that night.
You do know they were rioting and burning a city down, correct?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:20 pm to LSUFan8719
Hitting somebody in the head 2 time with a skateboard seems pretty inappropriate to me.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:21 pm to TBoy
quote:
Then he did kill.
In self defense. That’s what matters
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:21 pm to jchamil
quote:
He went in intentionally hostile? What evidence do you have he went in hostile?
That guy is talking straight out of his arse. He wants Rittenhouse to be guilty for ideological reasons, actual guilt or innocence has nothing to do with it
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:21 pm to tigahbruh
quote:
You haven't watched 3 seconds of this trial, have you? Almost none of what you typed is accurate per everything presented in court.
It's hilarious reading from the posters who obviously had their minds made up from the beginning that he was guilty. He shot a racist pedophile, an idiot who attacked him with a skateboard, and a guy who aimed down on him. If he truly was a mass shooter, he would have shot people who did not directly represent a clear and present threat.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:22 pm to tigahbruh
quote:
You haven't watched 3 seconds of this trial, have you? Almost none of what you typed is accurate per everything presented in court
They don't actually watch the trial and come to their own conclusion. They aren't capable of that.
They just read the lies from their media and go with that. It's sad that independent thought is lost on the left today. It used to be a staple of the liberal side.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
While I can see that the kid was terrified
Guilty or not guilty, a fricking 17yo kid shouldn't be out in the middle of violent protests armed with an AR-15. Nothing good could come of the situation.
His mother should be ashamed of herself for allowing her son to be in that position that night.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
The main problem Rittenhouse has is that he intentionally went hostile into a crowd armed with a deadly weapon. Why the frick was her there armed to kill? Then he did kill. Then members of the crowd went after him to try to stop an active shooter. So he shot them too.
While I can see that the kid was terrified, he created the deadly situation. This isn't so clean.
Still cleaner than the above post filled with spelling and grammar errors
Posted on 11/10/21 at 4:23 pm to NorthTxLSU
quote:
give this kid a fricking oscar what a performance
quote:
NorthTxLSU
Someone said this would be the play long before you showed your arse up.
If the dude looked like a robot and showed no emotion as he was questioned, you'd say that was proof he is a cold-blooded killer.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 4:29 pm
Page 31 of 115
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News