- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:57 pm to BROpaneTANK
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:57 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:Couldn’t I legally stand in front of the property with a gun at my side as a deterrent without shooting or pointing a gun at someone?
Yeah, when it’s your property. I can’t shoot my gun at someone to stop them from entering property I don’t own and wasn’t asked to defend. So by holding a gun to them only acts as an unauthorized threat to someone’s life.
Are you incapable of understanding my simple responses?
1
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:57 pm to WDE24
quote:
as a 17 year old he had no idea what he was doing
quote:Simple. If he is incapable of understanding the consequences of his actions, he cannot be tried. He would be using an insanity defense. Or claiming he is mentally disabled (retarded). Also same reason children are not tried as adults.
if this were true, he could not be tried.
can you explain?
Clearly he knew what he could/couldn't do. The idiotic prosecutor established that while trying to trip him up on the "protect property" line of questioning.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:58 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Wait what?
quote:
While questioning Rittenhouse, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger implied that his silence ahead of the trial was potentially incriminating. Rittenhouse’s attorney objected to the line of questioning. The judge sustained the defense’s objection and admonished the prosecutor for implying Rittenhouse should be penalized for exercising his constitutional right to remain silent.
“This is a grave constitutional violation for you to talk about the defendant’s silence, you’re right on the border line, you may be over. It better stop…This is not permitted,” the judge said, speaking to the prosecution attorney,
quote:
Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger started a line of questioning that targeted the 18-year-old's decision to remain silent after the deadly August 2020 shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
But after Rittenhouse's attorney Mike Richards objected, Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder paused the trial, sent the jury out of the room, and told Binger he was close to crossing the line.
"I was astonished when you began your examination by commenting on the defendant's post-arrest silence," Schroeder shouted. "That's basic law. It's been basic law in this country for 40 or 50 years … I don't know what you're up to."
"You're an experienced trial lawyer, and this should not have been gone into," the judge added.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:58 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
So by holding a gun to them only acts as an unauthorized threat to someone’s life.
When did this happen?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:58 pm to redandright
Can someone post the link to the live coverage?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:58 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Are there any clips of the judge dressing down Binder available yet?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:59 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
was that business insured?
Lol
100% bait
Get fricked
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:59 pm to WDE24
quote:and he could have did this without bullets in the gun…
demonstrating or showing one has the means of force as a deterrent to protect property can be legally accomplished without using deadly force.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:00 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:Or not. What’s your point? Or are you missing the context of the conversation completely?
and he could have did this without bullets in the gun…
ETA: I see you are just trolling. Carry on.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:00 pm to Tacktheritrix
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:00 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
But no part of why he went there with a weapon was something he was legally authorized to do,
I didn’t realize the scumbag rioters were legally authorized to terrorize Kenosha. Are you legally authorized to shake off your peepee when you make tinkles or does your mommy have to do it for you?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:00 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:And the rioters could have not attacked him.
and he could have did this without bullets in the gun…
It really all goes back to that.
If they don’t attack him, he doesn’t shoot anyone.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:00 pm to Tacktheritrix
quote:
Can someone post the link to the live coverage?
Rekeita Law
At lunch right now. But there is commentary from panel of YouTube lawyers.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:01 pm to Rebel
a couple of them are prosecutors and think Binger was way out of line and should be disbarred.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:02 pm to Scruffy
quote:
If they don’t attack him, he doesn’t shoot anyone.
the news already painted him as a murderer and a white supremacist a year ago. anyone who thinks this little trial for show is going to result in him being acquitted of murder hasnt been paying attention the last year.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:02 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Insurance doesn’t stop fire from destroying everything you worked for.
It don’t, but it gives you money to build new again
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to WDE24
quote:
Couldn’t I legally stand in front of the property with a gun at my side as a deterrent without shooting or pointing a gun at someone? Are you incapable of understanding my simple responses?
I think you’re intentionally ignoring pretty much everything I’m saying. Yeah you can stand there with your gun, and like Rittenhouse you can surely defend yourself from people that are trying to disarm you. Which he will rightfully get off for. But if those people walk right past you and break a window, you do not have the. Right to shoot them. Literally my only point.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to Winston Cup
quote:
the news already painted him as a murderer and a white supremacist a year ago. anyone who thinks this little trial for show is going to result in him being acquitted of murder hasnt been paying attention the last year.
I hope you're wrong but I agree with you.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:03 pm to chalmetteowl
Can we imagine for a second that the rioters are Muslim extremists loyal to ISIS. They are burning businesses and destroying your community while the police stand down and do not pursue these people.
What are you thoughts on Rittenhouse with that in mind?
Is your immediate first thought… are those businesses insured? Because that’s an absurd first thought
What are you thoughts on Rittenhouse with that in mind?
Is your immediate first thought… are those businesses insured? Because that’s an absurd first thought
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 11/10/21 at 1:04 pm to Scruffy
quote:
And the rioters could have not attacked him.
It really all goes back to that.
If they don’t attack him, he doesn’t shoot anyone.
It's not about the rioters personal responsibility. They have the right to do whatever they want. Burn, kill, destroy, anything is justified in the war for social justice.
It's about Kyle Rittenhouse, a white supremacist, murdering a peaceful protestor.
If he gets acquitted, this is a clear example of his white privilege and the white supremacy inherent in the justice system.
Page 18 of 115
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News