- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky Sheriff Mickey Stines shoots & kills District Judge Kevin Mullins in his office
Posted on 9/20/24 at 1:39 pm to Gris Gris
Posted on 9/20/24 at 1:39 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
hat would be interesting. I saw a blurb that they were close and had eaten lunch together with other court employees hours before this occurred.
Got some pregnancy DNA results back
0
Posted on 9/20/24 at 1:51 pm to rt3
When I was fresh out of law school, I asked our local judge (Texas) to appoint me to defend some triable misdemeanors so I could get a lot of quick jury trial experience. I would argue jury nullification to the jury (albeit discretely and obtusely).
In the following two cases, I asked the prospective jurors during voir dire if they had ever known people who "needed a whipping." They all eventually told me how they knew someone who needed one LOL.
Black restaurant owner goes into a convenience store. White punk calls him the N word as he goes in. The guy ignores the punk. Punk does it again as he goes out. The restaurant asks "that's in appropriate" and the punk responds "F you N". So, guy punches him in the nose and gets charged with battery. This was a retained case. My client admitted the punch and that it wasn't self defense. Jury: not guilty.
Two 18 year olds in high school (but adults). Kid 1 keeps telling Kid 2 that "his mother is a whore" and "I fricked your mother last night" and similar garbage. Kid 2 asks Kid 1 to quit, gets a smart arse answer, and then Kid 2 punches out Kid 1. School principal testifies that Kid 1 was always getting fights but "technically never starts the fight."
The young assistant DA's close was about a minute long, stating "defendant admitted the punch and admitted it was not self-defense." I had a brief argument that the "victim" was someone who needed a whipping. Not guilty, and the forewoman asked to speak to the Court and said we all agreed that the kid provoked the altercation and "got the long overdue whipping he deserved."
I've got a case locally that I took because there may be jury nullification. Guy works his arse off as a truck driver. Then, his employer does not pay him (and other drivers also get stiffed). So, the guy texts the employer asked for his pay. No threats. But, 9-10 texts. He gets charged with "cyberstalking."
In the following two cases, I asked the prospective jurors during voir dire if they had ever known people who "needed a whipping." They all eventually told me how they knew someone who needed one LOL.
Black restaurant owner goes into a convenience store. White punk calls him the N word as he goes in. The guy ignores the punk. Punk does it again as he goes out. The restaurant asks "that's in appropriate" and the punk responds "F you N". So, guy punches him in the nose and gets charged with battery. This was a retained case. My client admitted the punch and that it wasn't self defense. Jury: not guilty.
Two 18 year olds in high school (but adults). Kid 1 keeps telling Kid 2 that "his mother is a whore" and "I fricked your mother last night" and similar garbage. Kid 2 asks Kid 1 to quit, gets a smart arse answer, and then Kid 2 punches out Kid 1. School principal testifies that Kid 1 was always getting fights but "technically never starts the fight."
The young assistant DA's close was about a minute long, stating "defendant admitted the punch and admitted it was not self-defense." I had a brief argument that the "victim" was someone who needed a whipping. Not guilty, and the forewoman asked to speak to the Court and said we all agreed that the kid provoked the altercation and "got the long overdue whipping he deserved."
I've got a case locally that I took because there may be jury nullification. Guy works his arse off as a truck driver. Then, his employer does not pay him (and other drivers also get stiffed). So, the guy texts the employer asked for his pay. No threats. But, 9-10 texts. He gets charged with "cyberstalking."
Posted on 9/20/24 at 1:52 pm to mikelbr
Stine's Facebook page is still up. On March 31, he posted a happy birthday post to his daughter who was going to be 17 the following day, so now you know how old she is. She is not 18.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:17 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
I'm with the Sheriff. I doubt he cares that he will go to jail for the rest of his life. I wouldn't if I ended the threat.
I’ve never understood this line of thinking. You are willing to lose your family and children while you sit behind bars? Why not be there for them and let the police handle it? I would think they would need their father more than ever during times like that
This post was edited on 9/20/24 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:29 pm to Havoc
quote:
quote:I thought LA did have that clause, but I’ll defer to your experience on this issue.
Kentucky DOES have an age difference law that states 16-17 yr olds can't be frickin someone >=10 years older than they are unless married. Louisiana doesn't have that clause.
From Wikipedia again. I have not looked at actual law. Once 17 there is no age difference requirements in Louisiana as that’s LA’s legal age of consent. It does list something for 13 to 16 years of age that isn’t really worded like an an age difference requirement in a typical legal consent clause. It seems to not label it rape when one is 13 to 16 years of age and the other is 17 or older when there is consent but as a felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile offense when there is 4 years or more difference in age.
quote:
Felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile is committed when: (1) A person who is seventeen years of age or older has sexual intercourse, with consent, with a person who is thirteen years of age or older but less than seventeen years of age, when the victim is not the spouse of the offender and when the difference between the age of the victim and the age of the offender is four years or greater; or ...
This post was edited on 9/20/24 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:30 pm to mikelbr
NOT GUILTY
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:32 pm to mikelbr
Crazy stuff. Just can't see how the daughter would be interested in that dweeb
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:46 pm to Relham10
Let's just all hope this doesn't make it to John Robert's desk.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 2:52 pm to Relham10
May 3, 2023.
From someone else's Facebook page that referenced dining with friends. Stines and the judge in the picture.
From someone else's Facebook page that referenced dining with friends. Stines and the judge in the picture.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:02 pm to Vidic
quote:
let the police handle it?
Sheriff handled it
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:02 pm to LSUtoBOOT
quote:
Either way, this story still has a lot of holes in it.
And now, so does the judge.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:05 pm to Gris Gris
Why does the judge look like Thomas J. Sennett, if only he was stung in 2024?
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:09 pm to Gris Gris
I read some article that said Stines and Mullins were going to go to lunch that day (of the shooting).
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:29 pm to Pettifogger
If there's a sharper image of the photo above, someone could pull a date of that luncheon from the TV news screen.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:29 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
I've got a case locally that I took because there may be jury nullification. Guy works his arse off as a truck driver. Then, his employer does not pay him (and other drivers also get stiffed). So, the guy texts the employer asked for his pay. No threats. But, 9-10 texts. He gets charged with "cyberstalking."
why would you need jury nullification? I thought that was only if there was a crime proven but the jury acquits because they think it's too unfair to apply the law even if it fits.
What you're talking about sounds like not a crime at all?
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:35 pm to Gris Gris
Ol boy in the front is crushing some Mountain Dew
Posted on 9/20/24 at 3:47 pm to real turf fan
quote:
If there's a sharper image of the photo above, someone could pull a date of that luncheon from the TV news screen.
The date the friend posted it on FB is at the top of the photo where I put it. It's over a year old.
I also read that the judge and Stines had lunch together with other court employees hours before the shooting.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 4:02 pm to Gris Gris
Correction to my post above
The judge was married to the sister whose sister is married to the chief prosecutor and their children (according to the prosecutor quoted in the Daily Mail) are like brothers and sisters.
The judge was married to the sister whose sister is married to the chief prosecutor and their children (according to the prosecutor quoted in the Daily Mail) are like brothers and sisters.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 4:16 pm to ExtraGravy
quote:
What you're talking about sounds like not a crime at all?
I agree. But, they billed him.
Posted on 9/20/24 at 4:23 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Sgt. Slaughter needs to chill.
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News