- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:20 am to LSUGrrrl
quote:
What about the home security footage of her arriving home that night showing the taillight intact
Is there a video that shows this? I might have missed it.
quote:
then showing her backing up into John’s car when she left to go find him?
I agree on this, it definitely helps the defense.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:22 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Is there a video that shows this? I might have missed it.
there is video of Karen leaving john's house early in the morning. In the video the passenger taillight is completely lite up red. If the taillight was in the condition seen in court it would not be lite up in that manner.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:26 am to civiltiger07
Ha! They can't even get the correct evidence to bring to the trial. Idiots.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:28 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
Kind of but it could also be covered by snow. On John's ring camera video you can see her brake light still shining red, and not looking broken, when she left John's house that morning.
I agree I'm just trying to think of how a juror might justify it. In this screenshot you can see a section that isn't 100% red, but it's hard to tell with the weather conditions imo.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 9:36 am
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:29 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Is there a video that shows this? I might have missed it.
I watched it online during the end of the 1st trial. Wasn’t presented to the jury as it was caught by Turtle boy. Hoping it will be this time.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:34 am to civiltiger07
quote:
there is video of Karen leaving john's house early in the morning. In the video the passenger taillight is completely lite up red. If the taillight was in the condition seen in court it would not be lite up in that manner.
I've seen that video. He said there was video of her arriving at the house that showed it, I was just making sure I was talking about the same video. I posted a screenshot above of the video of her leaving the house which shows the taillight that I think people could make the argument that a section isn't lit up, but the quality isn't good so you cant tell much imo.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:36 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I think people could make the argument that a section isn't lit up
the problem with that is that the taillight would still be lite up and the top left portion of that taillight that doesn't seem lite up is the location of the reverse light. So that portion wouldn't be lite up red.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:38 am to civiltiger07
quote:
It shouldn't be too much longer until the Sally Port video is introduced
I'm really curious if the Commonwealth will introduce it or if the defense will have to. They supposedly aren't going to call Michael Proctor, the lead investigator, and It's not helpful for the Commonwealth since it shows Proctor right next to the passenger side tail light.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:39 am to civiltiger07
quote:
the problem with that is that the taillight would still be lite up and the top left portion of that taillight that doesn't seem lite up is the location of the reverse light. So that portion wouldn't be lite up red.
I agree with you, I'm just looking at it as if the juror was only able to see that video played in court. It might be hard for them to tell exactly which parts should be red vs white, especially with the quality of video not being great.
Just for comparison, it looks like at least some of the bottom part would be red.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 9:45 am
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:41 am to KosmoCramer
I am just seeing this looking back through the thread. Is that the picture of the EMT with the McCabe girl she said she isn't friends with, but just knows each other from passing?
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:52 am to LSBoosie
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:54 am to LSBoosie
I think the defense did a decent job of clarifying that in the first trial. I'm sure they will do well with it again this time.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:55 am to LSBoosie
I know this is off the topic yall are discussing, but I came across the above post on this tb daily news site.
tbdailysite
Its clearly one sided so take it all with a grain of salt.
tbdailysite
Its clearly one sided so take it all with a grain of salt.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 9:58 am to LSBoosie
I find it hard to believe hitting a body at 24 mph could do that much damage to a tail light. I was under the impression it was cracked and the concern was that proctor broke more pieces off to place at the crime scene. Will be interesting to see the defense present their side of the prosecution ever turns it over.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:01 am to 10tiger
the judge better be outraged after this evidence frick up
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:05 am to civiltiger07
quote:
the judge better be outraged after this evidence frick up
Something new happening in real time? I'm like an hour behind.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:07 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Something new happening in real time? I'm like an hour behind.
Yuri pulled out a shoe and Hank asked if it was the shoe that he got from the hospital. Yuri looks at the bag and says no this is the shoe found at 34 fairview.
just skip ahead to to where this happened. Everything leading up is a lot of nothing.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 10:09 am
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:09 am to 10tiger
quote:
I find it hard to believe hitting a body at 24 mph could do that much damage to a tail light. I was under the impression it was cracked and the concern was that proctor broke more pieces off to place at the crime scene. Will be interesting to see the defense present their side of the prosecution ever turns it over.
I thought one of the prosecution experts testified in the 1st trial that the tail light was cracked but no missing pieces. Did I dream that?
Posted on 5/8/25 at 10:10 am to civiltiger07
this might be a mistrial today
Page 70 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News