re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only

quote:

---

I didn't realize the Alberts sold their house.

---

I think the house at 34 Fairview was his childhood home

quote:

---

There is no way in heck they believe they can find 12 people to convict her of murder, so this is 100% to ruin her financially.


The process is the punishment.

---

When she is exonerated, her book deal will be in the $3-5 million range.

I don't know how charismatic she is. But if she is a decent public speaker then I'm guessing she will garner between $10k and $25k per event.

She'll be fielding movie deals, podcasts, seminars, etc. She will become the poster child for police corruption and prosecutor misconduct. And a very wealthy woman.

Attorneys take these really high profile cases pro bono. The media attention makes/keeps them famous. I just watched one documentary where an attorney wanted to pay the client to be his criminal defense attorney

quote:

---

I don't know how charismatic she is. But if she is a decent public speaker then I'm guessing she will garner between $10k and $25k per event.

---

She was an adjunct professor at Bentley College as well as a financial analyst. The interviews she did with Boston25’s Ted Daniels, I think showed she would do fine speaking in public, especially being a professor. Several of her co-workers have donated a substantial part of her defense funds.

I have a feeling that the jury will be wondering why Jackson was hitting Jen with the questioning about the dog being in the house. The questioning will probably make sense after they see the picture of John's arm if they don't remember the picture from the opening.

Looks like Paul O’Keefe may have actually done something this morning that forced the court to move his seating position. He has sat front row first seat the entire first trial, second trial, and every hearing. Now he is seated on yhe second row.

quote:

---

Looks like Paul O’Keefe may have actually done something this morning that forced the court to move his seating position.

---

Reporter that was able to get in courtroom today said that Paul was either glaring at Karen or making facial expressions at her. Judge told all family members present that it is not allowed and to not do it in the future.
Interesting because she let the Alberts stare Karen down during closing of first trial, enough to where a jury member said they were intimidated by them.

Per the Honorable Mark Bederow today:
“The judge will allow the ARCCA witnesses to testify about everything because the constitution compels that. But not until Brennan makes a mockery of a defendant's right to due process by trying to exclude them from saying anything. And the judge can't resist expressing sympathy for Brennan's predicament and then accuses the defense of engaging in nonsense. All in front of an international and national audience. There is NOTHING normal about this case. One final observation: Brennan is going to fall into the trap and go psycho on ARCCA, which would be a colossal blunder. He ought to worry about his own expert who has fixed the time of an incapacitating car accident as occurring before John stopped using the phone.”

LINK

Here’s a 15 minute video of two retired NYPD detectives that follow Karen’s case. They seem like stand up guys to me, I have followed them for a couple years.