Started By
Message

re: Jeep meets mob in CO - A "protester" shot other protestors when aiming for driver

Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:21 pm to
Posted by ihometiger
Member since Dec 2013
12475 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:21 pm to
This is exactly why MrLSU bullet proofed his cars when he bought them last year and we made fun of him. I may follow his lead and get bullet proof glass and armor for mine now.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
12789 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:21 pm to
Few prosecutors are going to charge lawful motorists for driving down the highway and not stopping for a crowd that is unlawfully assembled and disturbing the peace, while restricting access to potential emergency services.

It amazes me that people think it is acceptable for huge groups of people to assemble on freeways. America is in full retard mode.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12866 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

If your answer is “run them over because I have the right away, you’re wrong.

The fact that you don’t know the correct term is “right of way” tells me everything I need to know about your argument.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
12789 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:22 pm to
Right away. Lulz. I weep for the future.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26628 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

America is in full retard mode


Nah. Just a very loud minority.

They are pissed because America doesn’t see things their way and won’t vote for their radical left wing policies.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76259 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 1:31 pm to
So....just yesterday, we saw:

Aurora, Co - An armed "protester" accidentally shoot two other other "protesters".

Louisville, KY - A member of the NFAC accidentally discharge his weapon, wounding three of his fellow "protesters" at a NFAC demonstration.

Austin, TX - A dumb frick Call of Duty Larper who was unable to respawn after he and a group of fellow "protesters" surrounded a car and he fired his weapon at the driver of said car, provoking the driver to accurately return fire and neutralize the threat.

Los Angeles, CA - At a "street takeover" by "protesters" a fight broke out, and someone started shooting, killing an innocent 17 year old girl.


Did I miss anything?
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 2:10 pm
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76259 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:09 pm to
I updated my list to add an incident in LA last night. Twittet video of fight at "Street Takeover"
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

You are purposely misrepresenting the situation.


No I am Not.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30610 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:16 pm to
Why are protestors in the streets? There’s no reason their agenda cannot be pushed from the sidewalk.

Their only reason for being in streets is to disrupt. Once that happens, it’s no longer a peaceful protest.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Their only reason for being in streets is to disrupt. Once that happens, it’s no longer a peaceful protest.



So Rosa Parks was a terrorist?

Sit in? Basically, 9/11.

I agree, it’s dangerous to protest on the interstate because accidents happen.

But people also shouldn’t be purposefully or recklessly driving through crowds.

And the “screaming waiving weapons” narrative is Made up.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46805 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

No I am Not.


Yes, you are. You know your argument is shite so you keep trying to re-frame the argument and come up with your stupid fricking hypotheticals that have dick-all to do with the incident being discussed.

The protesters in the road blocking a individual from lawfully operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway are wrong.

Period. No "but", no "what if", no "no one has the high ground".

The protesters started the entire situation by impeding the rights of the jeep driver.

No one was run over. No one was struck by the vehicle. What did occur was a "protester" opened fire at the vehicle, and struck other "protesters".

The fact you keep arguing against this and making excuses for the "protesters" tells me you're nothing but a piece of shite that cares for the "cause" more than he does actually upholding individual rights.




Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

The protesters in the road blocking a individual from lawfully operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway are wrong.

Period. No "but", no "what if", no "no one has the high ground".



Sure. Th eh were wrong.

But Driving through them isn’t right.

If only there were some kind of age old saying about two wrongs.


Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46805 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

So Rosa Parks was a terrorist?


Oh frick off you sniveling little piece of shite.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:41 pm to
Read the whole post, including the quote.

How was Rosa Parks not disruptive?

Y’all motherfrickers can’t follow a conversation.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 2:42 pm
Posted by CalicoJack
The Centennial State
Member since Jun 2020
204 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

frick I was planning on going to Colorado for vacation. Is this crap widespread over there too?
Just went to dinner downtown last night, no issues.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

So Rosa Parks was a terrorist?


Now, I’ve only studied history for about 25 years so maybe I missed the part where Rosa Parks starting firing weapons at people who were walking down the aisle of the bus.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Now, I’ve only studied history for about 25 years so maybe I missed the part where Rosa Parks starting firing weapons at people who were walking down the aisle of the bus.


The post I quoted (so you just ignored) said once you start disrupting you’re no longer a peaceful protest.

That’s clearly wrong.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18685 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

And the “screaming waiving weapons” narrative is Made up.


Hahaha frick you.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76259 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I agree, it’s dangerous to protest on the interstate because accidents happen.


You're wrong. It is illegal to "protest" on an interstate or any public roadway without the proper permits.

When a protester(s) start blocking public roadways, they are no longer protesters. They are criminals. A throng of criminals impeding a legal citizen's right to travel by illegally blocking a public roadway is in no way whatsoever equal to police or other authorities shutting down a roadway. Their actions are inherently illegal and are an infringement upon other's constitutional rights.

We have a right to peaceful protest. Covered in that right is not a right to interfere with the rights of other citizens.

Long story short, they are criminals, not "protesters".
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:54 pm to
Have you seen other videos of the protest?

No screaming.

No waiving guns.

And there was a shooter who fired after this car decided he could drive through a crowd of people.

Again, that’s wrong.

Driving through people is wrong.
Shooting at cars driving through people is wrong.

Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram