Started By
Message

re: Jeep meets mob in CO - A "protester" shot other protestors when aiming for driver

Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:54 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76259 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

And the “screaming waiving weapons” narrative is Made up.


Look above at the list, dumbass, and that is just from yesterday. Nothing happens in a vaccum, and news travels fast these days.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:54 pm to
These are not peaceful protests. Comparing to Rosa Parks is absurd. They aren’t even just blocking interstates (which is much more disruptive than anything Parks did); they are attacking innocent people.

Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30610 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

So Rosa Parks was a terrorist?

Sit in? Basically, 9/11.



Did these events result in blocking an interstate? No.

If you cannot grasp that, then your view will continue to be flawed.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

These are not peaceful protests. Comparing to Rosa Parks is absurd. They aren’t even just blocking interstates (which is much more disruptive than anything Parks did); they are attacking innocent people.



I’ve seen video of the protest before the Jeep decided to drive through it.

It was peaceful.

There are plenty of other cars not being destroyed.

Simply put this car was in danger from the crowd after they decided to put the crowd in danger.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 2:58 pm
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Have you seen other videos of the protest?

No screaming.

No waiving guns.



So because there are videos of some protestors not screaming and waving guns, we can attribute that to the entire protest even though we know it to be patently untrue?



quote:

And there was a shooter who fired after this car decided he could drive through a crowd of people.

Again, that’s wrong.


You’re a clown.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46805 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

It was peaceful.


They were impeding the rights of others to travel on the road.

They were not peaceful. The minute they stepped on to the roadway they ceased being peaceful.

Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30610 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The post I quoted (so you just ignored) said once you start disrupting you’re no longer a peaceful protest.


We are talking about blocking a major street. When I use the word disrupt, it is in reference to pedestrians being on an interstate.

You are conveniently taking words and framing them with other situations (like Rosa Parks on a bus) that have absolutely zero to do with this incident.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

I’ve seen video of the protest before the Jeep decided to drive through it.

It was peaceful.

There are plenty of other cars not being destroyed.


Some Jews weren’t killed in the holocaust. Guess that was a peaceful event as well.

Clown.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 2:59 pm
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46805 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

We are talking about blocking a major street. When I use the word disrupt, it is in reference to pedestrians being on an interstate.


The rest of us in this thread understood this.

quote:

You are conveniently taking words and framing them with other situations (like Rosa Parks on a bus) that have absolutely zero to do with this incident.


Of course he is. He knows his argument is utter shite.

Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141297 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

There are plenty of other cars not being destroyed.


Do you hear yourself type?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

They were impeding the rights of others to travel on the road.

They were not peaceful. The minute they stepped on to the roadway they ceased being peaceful.


How is this different than a sit in or than what Rosa Parks did?

Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:01 pm to
This whole thread is justifying driving a vehicle through a crowd.

Do you people?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:01 pm to
I have a legal claim to a specific seat on a bus?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

How is this different than a sit in


Holy shite!

You've gotta be drinker than hell..
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46805 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

How is this different than a sit in or than what Rosa Parks did?


Who did Rosa Parks impede from exercising their rights?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:03 pm to
Answer the question.

Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49580 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

How is this different than a sit in or than what Rosa Parks did?



First and foremost, it did not impede on the travel rights of anyone else.

Second, it didn’t place Parks or anyone else at an elevated risk of harm from otherwise normal activity.

Third, and most importantly, Parks did not subsequently physically attack people who continued to operate in a legal and socially acceptable manner.

Clown world.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 3:05 pm
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61832 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

SammyTiger


You should go march down I-12 in Baton Rouge. Please film it.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79873 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

First and foremost, it did not impede on the travel rights of anyone else.


Sorry, but I dont Remember the bus going anywhere while she was sitting in the front.

quote:

Second, it don’t place Parks or anyone else at an elevated risk of harm from otherwise normal activity.


You never run into traffic on the interstate?

It’s only an elevated risk if you ignore all the other laws that already exist.
quote:

Third, and most importantly, Parks did not subsequently physically attack people who continued to operate in a legal and socially acceptable manner.


And that’s wrong, but the other posters post is that as soon as the start protesting on the highway it’s not peaceful because it’s disruptive.

That’s not true.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 3:07 pm
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24526 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 3:08 pm to
This is at least the 3rd "protest" shooting I've heard of in less than 24 hours. How much longer is this gonna be allowed to go on? When you start shooting, that's not a protest any longer.

At some point, someone is going to kill a lot of folks and that person will bear the brunt of the blame, right or wrong. That person, protester or driver, will have their life destroyed. The blame should be laid squarely at the feet of local and state governments for allowing this horseshite to go on unchecked for so long.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram