Started By
Message

re: JBE Conference at 2:30

Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56855 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
People still aren’t wearing masks
Lady tried to go in UPS Store earlier & was told she had to go get a mask
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148046 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
testing has been ticking down in 8 of the 9 (and in some cases dramatically) since ~7/14

the only 1 that's seen an any kind of increase in testing since that date is Shreveport/Bossier... which the tick up came after its own bit of fall off

ETA: by Shreveport/Bossier... I obviously mean Region 7
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 3:11 pm
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43561 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
So what's going to happen if we have a hurricane and testing centers shut down or people don't get tested?

This is all predicated on peoples willingness to get tested.

I guess that's why he went hunting in the prisons.
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
11686 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

The backdating of cases and tests don't get published until a couple days after that date. I agree, that is annoying. I don't think it is malice because this delay was there when cases were rising as well.


It could very well be malice but how would we know without the data in a format we can do the calculations same as them?

That's my problem, they throw shite out there that nobody can verify. That's a problem.

In fact they throw stuff out there that appears to be worse than what we are able to calculate. I can't rule out malice based on current info, sorry.

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89448 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:09 pm to
You're not answering my question.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40277 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:12 pm to
There’s free drive thru testing in Abbeville today — I drove by on my way to somewhere and there were 2 National Guard people and a sheriffs car parked nearby — no one was testing.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79913 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:13 pm to
Simply put. You are using bad data to assume LDH positivity rate is wrong.

The spreadsheet posted here daily should not be credited to the day it is posted on.

Why does LDH report it this way? Go look at the shite fit Georgia residents had when Georgia said they were withholding the data to filter out changes from backdating. We want data now, but fail to recognize that it is rae data.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89448 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

You are using bad data to assume LDH positivity rate is wrong.



Holy shite


quote:

The spreadsheet posted here daily should not be credited to the day it is posted on.

Why does LDH report it this way? Go look at the shite fit Georgia residents had when Georgia said they were withholding the data to filter out changes from backdating. We want data now, but fail to recognize that it is rae data.



You're
still
not
answering
my
question
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79913 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

data in a format we can do the calculations same as them?

That's my problem, they throw shite out there that nobody can verify. That's a problem.

In fact they throw stuff out there that appears to be worse than what we are able to calculate. I can't rule out malice based on current info, sorry.



Well you don't even know where to find the data, so yeah, I wouldn't expect you to have any concept of how to verify it.

All the data is there. If you want to verify it go to the LDH site. The spreadsheet from tigerdroppings just recently got the number of daily deaths right.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79913 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:16 pm to
Alright, dumb it down for me. What is your question.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89448 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Alright, dumb it down for me. What is your question.


I've dumbed it down as much as possible.
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
22814 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:19 pm to
LDH seems to include #s of tests faster than results too.

Which makes the daily numbers seem lower than what they potentially are.

For example, March 1 through July 22 there were 113,156 tests in Orleans Parish per the LDH. Through the same dates there were 100,352 negative and 12,642 positive which only comes out to 112,994.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43561 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:21 pm to
That makes other daily numbers higher than they potentially are too.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 3:23 pm
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56855 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79913 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:23 pm to
Maybe my answer is above your head then.

Disregard everything you know becaude you are using the tigerdroppings spreadsheet. I know this is tough because that is really your only source of data you have been following.

LDH does not daily report tests reflecting the last 24 hours. They report the data collected over the last 24 hours. For instance, 35 people died from covid yesterday, right now they only know of 6. However, they had 45 deaths reported over the last 10 days.

It will take 7-10 days for this data to normalize. The state is making calls off of data 7-10 days old because that is the normalized data.

Meanwhile, people on this site are using the daily numbers as if they represent the actual 24 hour changes. They neglect that testing delays have moved from 5 days to almost 14 days in the last month.

This doesn't mean that numbers aren't dropping or rising. It just means that data is delayed in showing those trends.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89448 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Maybe my answer is above your head then.

That's not it.
quote:

This doesn't mean that numbers aren't dropping or rising. It just means that data is delayed in showing those trends.

SO you still are not answering the fricking question
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 3:25 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79913 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

For example, March 1 through July 22 there were 113,156 tests in Orleans Parish per the LDH. Through the same dates there were 100,352 negative and 12,642 positive which only comes out to 112,994.




And I'm not sure how some of that reflects multiple tests.
Posted by LSUJML
Central
Member since May 2008
56855 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:24 pm to
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
22814 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:24 pm to
Correct.

It doesn't really make sense to me to report tests that haven't gotten a result yet in the daily numbers which they seem to be doing.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112689 posts
Posted on 7/30/20 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

SO you still are not answering the fricking question
Stop being a twat

He has answered your question perfectly. You are just pissed
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram