Started By
Message

re: It’s a beautiful morning to be a taxpayer in EBR

Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:44 am to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29837 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Well, you got your wish. 240 city parish employees will be getting layoff notices on Monday.



Sounds like a good start. Now let’s start cutting state jobs too.
LA has one of the highest per capita of state employees in the country.
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15761 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I don’t. He’s a football coach that ran for office under the summation that he was a good leader. He’s not creative and not as honest as he thought. THRIVE is a shining example of that. He could’ve forced city leaders to go back to the drawing board instead of using emotional manipulation. A good leader does what’s right, not what’s easy.


I never said he was a good option, but he was a hell of a lot better choice than keeping the status quo and keeping Broome stick

Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29837 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Saying that the funds would be segregated is hardly a summarization of “we would have to create an entirely new government from scratch”.



What are you talking about?
The parish government is already in place for the most part. It’s called the metro council, we’d just need to elect a parish president. We already have parish run entities like Brec, the sheriff, library, COA, Etc. That wouldn’t change.
Posted by hometownhero89
Center of the Earth
Member since Aug 2007
2048 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

I never said he was a good option, but he was a hell of a lot better choice than keeping the status quo and keeping Broome stick


Hence why he won. But he better evolve sooner than later.
Posted by hometownhero89
Center of the Earth
Member since Aug 2007
2048 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Joshjrn


The EBR mayor is the parish president in EBR. Any mayor should replace the offices roles that are not elected each time they have a new mayor. The dems are much better at this and the R’s don’t do this effectively. Political hold-overs don’t hold a purpose to a new admin.
Posted by rowbear1922
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2008
15761 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Hence why he won. But he better evolve sooner than later.


Hence why I feel bad for him. He won a job he’s not qualified for and was left a complete shitshow. Things will get darkest before the dawn, if there is a dawn, for BR.

There will be some very hard decisions that need to be made. We will see if he sinks or swims
Posted by hometownhero89
Center of the Earth
Member since Aug 2007
2048 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:12 am to
I voted for him. I don’t think we should pity anyone who wanted the mayor’s seat after a shite show. He knew what he was getting into. He should do what’s right for the city the first 3/4 of his term then people please towards the end of it.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41884 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:17 am to
quote:

We already have parish run entities like Brec, the sheriff, library, COA, Etc. That wouldn’t change.


COA is not a government entity, but it is government funded.

BREC is a state entity.

The problem is who appoints the various board members. There is very little public oversight in some of these entities.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
5072 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:50 am to
quote:

No one is saying dissolve the parish govt.
just separate the city and the parish funds.
The parish would have its own general fund that wouldn’t be used on the city of BR essential services anymore.


Why is this so difficult to understand?



Be careful what you wish for. City of BR generates the lion's share of city-parish money and has the largest consolidated voting blocs.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2109 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

No one is saying dissolve the parish govt. just separate the city and the parish funds.


You may not be the one saying but there are alot of people on this board who was rattling that saber during the quest for St George.

Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
7570 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

I feel sorry for Sid.


I don’t. He can resign if he wants. Put me in there. I will slash dumbass expenses so fast it will make your head spin.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73355 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29837 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Be careful what you wish for. City of BR generates the lion's share of city-parish money and has the largest consolidated voting blocs.


Awesome.
The city of Baton Rouge can keep their money themself and spend it on their own city.
The money already generated from parish wide taxes can continue to fund parish only activities.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9632 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Probablly because they are smart enough to realize that they need the collective tax base of the parish in order to get the infrastucture improvements necessary to supprt their growing communities.

Would Central have been able to pay for the road improvements to get in and out of thier city over the past 20 years with just a local base? Same could be asked for St Georgians as well.


And the parish govt would still exist when the BR metro parish govt gets dissolved. Any state govt funding for certain roads would also still exist. Any federal funds would as well.

What would not exist is the intermingled general fund and the office of the mayor-president between the city of Baton Rouge and the entire EBR parish.

Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
8585 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 2:01 pm to
The EBR library is stacked with cash while the rest of the Parish turns to shite. I would call this an objective loss for EBR. Glad I moved.
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
2109 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Any state govt funding for certain roads would also still exist. Any federal funds would as well.


And the local match would be diluted. Dissolving and adding back only adds another layer of government and more gov't employees.
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
15857 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

Yet, people quote that 57% increased collections as if their individual bill went up 57%.



My property taxes have pretty much tripled in the 5 to 10 year with that last 5 years exploding so dont be feeding this BS about this puny mileage rate reduction They just passed. You must be a cop , fireman or board member if you believe that sh*t is going to help out the homeowners here.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9632 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

quote:

Any state govt funding for certain roads would also still exist. Any federal funds would as well.

And the local match would be diluted.


It’s diluted already by being focused on BR instead of the majority of the parish’s residents outside of the city of BR.

quote:

adding back only adds another layer of government and more gov't employees.
It only adds another layer on top of BR since they will not run the parish govt anymore. Everyone else will still have the same levels of govt.

The number of employees being a large issue would imply a large duplication of services which shouldn’t happen. Maybe BR allows that to happen. There might be more, or there might be less. Each will be allowed to adjust on their own by either cutting services or increasing taxes.
This post was edited on 11/16/25 at 3:08 pm
Posted by hometownhero89
Center of the Earth
Member since Aug 2007
2048 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

I would call this an objective loss for EBR. Glad I moved.


How? Jindal did this hole patching move with state offices before he got wide eyed at a presidential run. It didn’t make anything better.

Now voters try to prevent this on a smaller level and it’s just a worse situation?

I don’t see how taking money from a well run system to a poorly managed system helps a current problem. At least this way a government department that is run like a private business actually has to be held accountable as such. Local government workers will find a new job and survive. The responses that act like the sky is falling is just emotional manipulation so they don’t have to change anything. they clearly have been spending outside of their means for sometime.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2924 posts
Posted on 11/16/25 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

My property taxes have pretty much tripled in the 5 to 10 year with that last 5 years
How? Is it homesteaded? Honestly wondering because I think I understand how it works but maybe not. Haven't been here long enough to experience it myself. I have family that want to move here but see these anecdotal bits online that make them fear their taxes would soar which doesn't make sense to me. What am I missing? Are actual primary home property taxes for long time residents really sky rocketing a despite level millage rates and SOH protections?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram