- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Isn't pretty much everybody alive from a royal blood line?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:23 pm
So, I got to thinking since only like 40% of males mate with a female right? Only like 50% of females have children as well, so yeah only like half the population breeds.
If you go back far enough there would be royalties which mean we are pretty much all related and have royal ancestors.
If you go back far enough there would be royalties which mean we are pretty much all related and have royal ancestors.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:24 pm to Gcockboi
Yea, terd is a royal a-hole.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:25 pm to Gcockboi
quote:
So, I got to thinking since only like 40% of males mate with a female right?
Is this a guess?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:26 pm to Gcockboi
Are you talking about Adam and Eve?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:26 pm to Gcockboi
My family came over on the Mayflower
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:26 pm to Gcockboi
Most Europeans of non-British extraction are pretty likely to have Carloginian blood.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:27 pm to HempHead
My dad was a king in a parade once. Does that count?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:29 pm to Gcockboi
quote:
So, I got to thinking since only like 40% of males mate with a female right?
Do you mean mate successfully, as in produce offspring? Or just have intercourse? Either way, it has to be much higher than 40%. The number of males who mate with a female at some point in their life, offspring or no offspring, must be 98%. The percentage that eventually father children I would guess has to be over 65%.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:29 pm to Gcockboi
I don't know about the accuracy of you percentages, but you are right that a vast majority of people, if they take the time and effort to do it, could trace their family back to royalty. I've done it for my family and gone as far back as William the Conqueror and some of the Anglo-Saxon kings that preceded him, although you have to understand that the further back you go, the more questionable things can become.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:30 pm to Gcockboi
Deep, but How does a blind man know when he's done wiping his arse?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:31 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
Yea, terd is a royal a-hole.
I do joxy ya know!
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:37 pm to Gcockboi
Roughly 10% of the men in the historic Mongolian Empire are a direct descendant of Genghis Khan. That works out to be roughly 1 in every 200 men in the world.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:47 pm to Gcockboi
Most of us descend from Genghis Khan.
Popular
Back to top

20












