0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is It Time For Body Cameras or Room Cameras During Sex?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 12:05 am to SaintsForever83
Posted on 10/3/26 at 12:05 am to SaintsForever83
quote:Wait. It wasn't time before? shite.
Is It Time For Body Cameras or Room Cameras During Sex?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 1:03 am to SaintsForever83
quote:
Is it not time for men to insist on a body camera or a room camera during sex?
That will surely fix the predator problem.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 3:05 am to SaintsForever83
Then the guys will get busted for video voyeurism.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 3:15 am to SaintsForever83
Shut up, bot.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 3:26 am to SaintsForever83
Just both parties prior to sex sign legal documents agreeing to all activities.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 3:42 am to lsu xman
quote:
Just both parties prior to sex sign legal documents agreeing to all activities
Hochul wants to make that illegal if she has any alcohol after consent.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 3:46 am to SaintsForever83
quote:
Say what you all want, but I bet these Cornell guys wish they had the sexual experience on camera. A lot of them could then make this go away very quickly, instead of having their names and reputation utterly destroed.
She would still be wasted, which is really the issue.
Also, if you want to have group sex with a woman, it’s probably a bad idea to text “Free Pu**y” to your boys.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 5:49 am to thenza
quote:
Some of you guys are really losing your grip on reality.
This whole men versus women thing that has seemingly emerged over the last decade is just weird and only exists on the internet.
As the average age of this board rises, it is losing touch with younger generations.
It doesn’t only exist on the internet. Statistics show a massive divergence in ideology between young men and woman, specifically a sharp divergence in progressive ideology for young women.
This doesn’t just impact who you vote for. It impacts how you view the world. Your morals, your religious beliefs.
The average age of marriage is rising. Birth Rates are falling.
Video games, weed, porn and gambling are rotting the brains of young men. Feminism is destroying young women.
The statistics are there warning you this is real problem that is only getting worse.
Also, before somebody hurls an incel joke my way, I am happily married with a family.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 5:55 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 5:52 am to SaintsForever83
Bob Crane already did this
Posted on 10/3/26 at 6:15 am to Cliff Booth
quote:An app that has a contract embedded with a third party (possibly AI-based) interview of both parties to ensure mental capacity along with each party submitting a real time blood sample (the prick before the prick).
If I’m ever back on the market ima have to put that thing into Docusign.
Dystopian, I know. I’m guessing that sex-bots will be a thing.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:31 am to soccerfüt
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:38 am to udtiger
quote:
Hochul wants to make that illegal if she has any alcohol after consent.
Yes there has to be video evidence of the entire encounter.
The problem with just a legal contract is the woman can easily say "I stopped consenting and they continued". So then they'll say that the contract is void.
I'm not saying video is foolproof, but it's a lot harder to argue against.
And for those saying it's illegal, it's actually not. It's legal as long as both parties agree. In some states that's not even the requirement. In some states only one party has to know.
But for guy it's simple, the girl doesn't agree to have the video, assume she is going to press charges against you the next day for rape. The girl doesn't agree to you having a room camera or body camera, no sex.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:44 am to SaintsForever83
Casual sex is gonna continue to be a major issue for average men until sexbots fill the easy sex demand and the majority of actual relationships will be serious and intended for marriage and kids.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 10:23 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:45 am to udtiger
quote:
Hochul wants to make that illegal if she has any alcohol after consent.
Key word, wants to. You can't retroactively apply laws, so whatever Hochul "wants to do" wouldn't apply here.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:47 am to udtiger
quote:
Hochul wants to make that illegal if she has any alcohol after consent.
I thought Hochul just wants NY law to be similar to the recent Texas law, among many other states?
Simply that, for example, a girl who's incoherently drunk isn't completely fair game for whatever because she chose to get too drunk?
Does the recent Texas law really hold that any woman who has been drinking can't consent to sex?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:47 am to thenza
quote:
This whole men versus women thing that has seemingly emerged over the last decade is just weird and only exists on the internet.
Oh look, an idiot
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:57 am to SaintsForever83
quote:
And for those saying it's illegal, it's actually not. It's legal as long as both parties agree. In some states that's not even the requirement. In some states only one party has to know.
LOL,
you're confusing that with a recorded conversation.
In no State is it legal to film yourself having sex without the other person being aware of it.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:57 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Also, if you want to have group sex with a woman, it’s probably a bad idea to text “Free Pu**y” to your boys.
This.
Again. This.
I’m don’t know much about this case, but that right there is not good for them.
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 9:58 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:31 am to SaintsForever83
quote:
You can't retroactively apply laws, so whatever Hochul "wants to do" wouldn't apply here
Laughs in retroactive "get Trump" law that allowed Carroll to sue him 30 years after the fact.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 10:41 am to SaintsForever83
The move is probably to avoid questionable group chemsex and vet the women (or men for you) that you sleep with.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News