- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:20 pm to HodsonTiger13
I've gotten everything from 78 to 159. I'd imagine if I average all of my scores for all of my emails, I end up right about average in IQ, which is about where I always thought I was.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:23 pm to HodsonTiger13
Cut and pasted my graduate thesis (it sadly has a serious limit and doesn't accept anything past a certain length) and got a 146 (exceptionally gifted)
probably the most accurate assessment I can get.
not bad. i'll take it.
probably the most accurate assessment I can get.
not bad. i'll take it.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:43 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:Is the Q thread archived anywhere?
Pasting posts from the OT into this tool should provide hours of entertainment.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:49 pm to HodsonTiger13
I got a 125.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:50 pm to BottomlandBrew
quote:
, I end up right about average in IQ, which is about where I always thought I was.
I figure most on this board are slightly above average in IQ. I don't mind being middling.
I know for sure my IQ isn't 158.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:53 pm to HodsonTiger13
Well folks, you heard it here first 
Posted on 2/13/23 at 1:59 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
quote:
Estimated IQ: 86 (average)
I doubt any president in past 50 years writes their own SOTU address. I also doubt a speechwriter for the president only has an IQ of 86. If you transcribed some of Biden's off the cuff remarks, I think he'd be lucky to score an 86.
I generally question the validity of these tests, but it would be interesting to submit some early 2017/18 Trump tweets (before someone on staff started cleaning them up), complete with his inherent grammatical errors, spelling mistakes and limited vocabulary. I don't know how he would score, but I'd bet it's something less than his self professed 157 IQ.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:26 pm to HodsonTiger13
Aggie War Hymn scored a 93
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:56 pm to tokenBoiler
One thing that should be made clear that really isn't on the website: We all gear our messages by the intended audience. So the message you put on that webpage is more of a reflection of how you perceive the audience rather than an indicator of the writer's intelligence quotient.
It's really just about the writing sample itself, which makes it kind of fun to play with.
I ran a personal email through this because I'm particularly concerned with sharing work emails at an unknown site. Here are are my results:
It's really just about the writing sample itself, which makes it kind of fun to play with.
I ran a personal email through this because I'm particularly concerned with sharing work emails at an unknown site. Here are are my results:
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 2:58 pm to HodsonTiger13
153 for an off the cuff generic/standard e-mail.
If that leads you to suppose that I leverage scintillating syntax and meticulous messaging for my professional communications, that would be a punctilious prognostication.
Good day to you all
If that leads you to suppose that I leverage scintillating syntax and meticulous messaging for my professional communications, that would be a punctilious prognostication.
Good day to you all
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:08 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Evidently this thing is very impressed with any coherent language. Might be a sign of the times.
I'm going to start running OT posts through it.
Then I'll take the same posts and switch "You" to "Y'all".
Then I'm going to intentionally break syntax and subject-verb agreements one by one to isolate and identify how culturally biased and potentially racist the estimator actually is....
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:13 pm to frequent flyer
quote:
I'm going to start running OT posts through it.
Then I'll take the same posts and switch "You" to "Y'all".
Then I'm going to intentionally break syntax and subject-verb agreements one by one to isolate and identify how culturally biased and potentially racist the estimator actually is....
First you'd have to identify a grouping of grammatical errors and assign them to specific regional or racial language preference.
The OT can help you with that.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 3:41 pm to HodsonTiger13
Lol. On one of my publications, I got a score of 168. I'm guessing this rewards the heavy use of technical language.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 4:05 pm to crazy4lsu
Ran two random grad school papers, 89 and 120.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:13 pm to HodsonTiger13
I copied my Masters thesis opening paragraph. It said 138.
I copied a few if my posts. It said I was borderline retarded at 80.
I copied a few if my posts. It said I was borderline retarded at 80.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:18 pm to HodsonTiger13
Said I was retarded.
So...pretty accurate?
So...pretty accurate?
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:22 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I'm guessing this rewards the heavy use of technical language.
It loves colons more than Richard Gere's gerbil.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:26 pm to dewster
quote:
particularly concerned with sharing work emails at an unknown site.
That would be a pretty clever scam to obtain information
Posted on 2/13/23 at 10:35 pm to HodsonTiger13
one fiddy one based on the 1st paragraph of my dissertation.
Then I deleted a couple of sentences and it gave me a 165 lmao. stupid.
Wasn't Feynman the one to say if you can't explain difficult concepts in layman's terms then you don't truly understand the topic?
quote:
Numerical simulation involving complex geometries has long since posed significant challenges for engineers
and scientists. In particular, the construction of boundary-fitted meshes can be labor intensive or even a suboptimal
choice for the problem at hand (e.g. certain evolving interface/boundary problems, fluid-structure interaction
models with rotating objects, etc... ). This is especially true for high-order mesh generation where curvilinear
elements are warped to fit more complicated topolgies. Embedded boundary methods offer an alternative
approach to the discritization process, whereby the geometry is “embedded” into a fixed background mesh and
the boundary conditions are enforced numerically on nearby elements.
Then I deleted a couple of sentences and it gave me a 165 lmao. stupid.
Wasn't Feynman the one to say if you can't explain difficult concepts in layman's terms then you don't truly understand the topic?
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 10:38 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News