Started By
Message

re: If someone sent a gallon of water a nanosecond back in time - it would duplicate

Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:29 am to
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7850 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:29 am to
At this time(the present) we are able to navigate in the 3 dimensions but are unable to navigate the fourth (time).
Posted by lsu1919
Member since May 2017
3244 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:33 am to
quote:

If time travel is possible BUT it creates new branches/timelines, and we have no proof of time travel, does that mean we're in a "stranded" original time line where time travel doesn't happen because the time travel actually happens in the new timelines?


Posted by F73ME
SE LA
Member since May 2018
915 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:36 am to
quote:

- it would duplicate


No it wouldn't. You're not accounting for the fact that a nanosecond after the duplicate gallon appeared, a gallon disappears to go back in time.

Do less drugs.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66097 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:37 am to
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:39 am to
quote:

At this time(the present) we are able to navigate in the 3 dimensions but are unable to navigate the fourth

I always thought the fourth dimension was color spectrum.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11535 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:43 am to
So that's how Uncle Scrooge has so many gold coins to swim in.

Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9141 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:43 am to
But by that logic, wouldn’t it just leave our past selves with double the water while our present selves would have no water at all? I mean, let’s say you took a fully stocked machine gun and sent it back to the crusaders. That machine gun wouldn’t duplicate to exist at both times simultaneously. It would be removed from our time and added to the past.

So in your example, we wouldn’t have the Pacific Ocean dropped on us; we’d be living in a desert! It would be an offshoot past branch of the timeline that would have the water surplus while we’d be left high and dry.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24238 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:45 am to
quote:

a gallon of water a nanosecond

Even a pump that fast couldn't stop NOLA from flooding after a summer thunderstorm.
Posted by Landmass
Premium Member
Member since Jun 2013
25572 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Mandela effect - when our consciousness gets transferred to the closest timeline


No, the Mandela effect is nothing more than common memory mistakes. Memories are rarely as accurate as you think they are. These can even be on a mass scale.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60921 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 10:03 am to
quote:

No it wouldn't. You're not accounting for the fact that a nanosecond after the duplicate gallon appeared, a gallon disappears to go back in time.


Not from the gallon’s perspective
Posted by F73ME
SE LA
Member since May 2018
915 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Not from the gallon’s perspective



This isn't that hard dude.

1 gallon of water cruising through time. Suddenly 1 gallon shows up, back from 1 nanosecond in the future.

Then our 1 gallon of water disappears 1 nanosecond into the past, where it meets its previous self. 1 nanosecond later, its previous self disappears into the past.

Again, do less drugs.

Or maybe more, whatever it takes to get you to understand.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476658 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 10:20 am to
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60921 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

This isn't that hard dude.

1 gallon of water cruising through time. Suddenly 1 gallon shows up, back from 1 nanosecond in the future.


Apparently it is

1. 1 Gallon to Start at Time A going back to Time B
2. Back in time A, as you go to place the gallon on the machine, there will already be a Gallon from Time B as you are placing the gallon in Time A to go back to Time B - because it was there in the past where you placed it
3. Now Time A has become Time A' with a gallon from the past already there as you place the present gallon in the machine.
4. This creates Time A'' with two gallons already there. One from the original Time B that you sent and a second from Time B'

Etc Etc

It creates a duplication if other timelines aren't created.
This post was edited on 6/30/21 at 1:03 pm
Posted by RockinDood
Member since Aug 2020
1107 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 1:07 pm to
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
60995 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

At this time(the present)


Thanks for clarifying.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 1:51 pm to
My math shows 5929 years assuming there are 187 quintillion gallons in the Pacific Ocean
Posted by joebauers
Future
Member since Jul 2020
109 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by F73ME
SE LA
Member since May 2018
915 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Apparently it is


For you.

There is no time A'

quote:

1. 1 Gallon to Start at Time A going back to Time B


There are already 2 gallons when you arrive at time A. because one already entered the past (time B) from the future (Time A)

Do I have to MSpaint a timeline for you?

This post was edited on 6/30/21 at 2:42 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60921 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 3:29 pm to
Your graph discounts the paradox of the past already existing in place if you change it

If I send you back to 1 minute ago from point A to be in the same room next to me at point B…you will be standing at point B in the present as I am sending you back from point A

In other words, at the very moment I go to send you back to point B from point A, you would have already been at point B as well because that already happened in the past…

Creating a paradox where you are standing at Point A in the present to be sent back but also at Point B because it already happened in the past

Keep doing that and the paradox multiplies
This post was edited on 6/30/21 at 3:33 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60921 posts
Posted on 6/30/21 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

My math shows 5929 years assuming there are 187 quintillion gallons in the Pacific Ocean


Mine did to, just forget to multiply the 570 x 18
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram