- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE agent rammed by lunatic in MN suffered internal bleeding
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:25 pm to Klark Kent
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:25 pm to Klark Kent
DHS already confirmed it by the time Fox ran their report
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:27 pm to lsupride87
He should've emptied his clip into that rainbow vehicle the second it made contact.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:27 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:28 pm to MSUDawg98
I also like how bruises would be no big deal
When you are hit by a charging car that causes bruises that’s clear as day a life threatening situation
When you are hit by a charging car that causes bruises that’s clear as day a life threatening situation
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:30 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Could it be possible a bruise described as internal bleeding? Sure. It’s possible. That would be far outside of the normal nomenclature. Possible though? Yes
But this is literally the response flooded on my Twitter by every person with pink hair and nose rings
It is absolutely outside of the normal nomenclature. So is calling a fleeing suspect a domestic terrorist. So is saying some one was ran over when their body was clipped by the corner of a vehicle coming out of park.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:32 pm to ThuperThumpin
Ok
What would you call it when an accelerating car hits someone causing injuries
frick it , let’s just stick with pure perfect description
“Woman being told to get out of car hits gas pedal running into agent causing injuries”
That work?
What would you call it when an accelerating car hits someone causing injuries
frick it , let’s just stick with pure perfect description
“Woman being told to get out of car hits gas pedal running into agent causing injuries”
That work?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:32 pm to lsupride87
He wasn’t hit tho!!! She was going 2 mph!
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:33 pm to lsupride87
Yeah the reddit brigade has already decided that this is either:
A. Bruising being described as "internal bleeding"
B. An outright lie*
*Bonus: Trump's assassination attempt was staged too, so there's precedent for faking medical reports
A. Bruising being described as "internal bleeding"
B. An outright lie*
*Bonus: Trump's assassination attempt was staged too, so there's precedent for faking medical reports
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:34 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:this is also just a bold face lie so please correct this since we are using factual language only
clipped by the corner of a vehicle coming out of park.
It was an accelerating vehicle, not a vehicle simply coming out of park
I know you would never intentionally mislead brother
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:34 pm to lsupride87
quote:
would likely be called contusions
Because if you call it a contusion it costs more — not as much as a hematoma — but more than a bruise.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:34 pm to lsupride87
I have seen no video showing him being struck in the torso by the body of the vehicle, and we all saw him walk/run away with no immediate physical notion of an injury. However, cannot dismiss he could have been clipped by the side mirror. One thing is for sure, government lies to cover its arse. Chalking this up to a lie.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:35 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
So is calling a fleeing suspect a domestic terrorist.
I don't think she was called such for fleeing... she was labeled that for all the shite she did BEFORE that interaction as well as "clipping" the dude with her Honda.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:35 pm to Montezuma
quote:Hmmm
I have seen no video showing him being struck in the torso by the body of the vehicle

This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:41 pm to lsupride87
One can believe the shooting was justified while also thinking that calling what the officer suffered as “internal bleeding” is his injuries being sensationalized
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:42 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
One can believe the shooting was justified while also thinking that calling what the officer suffered as “internal bleeding” is his injuries being sensationalized
Absolutely not you cuck centrist freedom hating cuck.
Believe every single thing DHS says through anonymous spokesmen briefed on the subject.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:42 pm to lsupride87
You just showed him leaning forward , which makes his torso behind his shoulder. Hmmmm
ETA: There is a slowed down video that shows that he puts his hand holding the phone on the hood to lean forward for the first shot, and in my opinion DOES get hit in the torso as she turns away. So there IS a chance he has a bruise from being hit by the body of the vehicle in his torso. All other opinions on the matter aside, I was wrong and will be a man and say so. I believe he was struck by her vehicle, from what I see in the video floating around on social media.
ETA: There is a slowed down video that shows that he puts his hand holding the phone on the hood to lean forward for the first shot, and in my opinion DOES get hit in the torso as she turns away. So there IS a chance he has a bruise from being hit by the body of the vehicle in his torso. All other opinions on the matter aside, I was wrong and will be a man and say so. I believe he was struck by her vehicle, from what I see in the video floating around on social media.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:43 pm to TT9
quote:
Just saying that they make up shite all the time, same as the two liberal ones.
Well yeah, but do you not have the ability to look at an article and decipher what is bs and what isn't? I don't think there are many examples of any of those networks just making up a statement from a federal agency.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:44 pm to SUB
quote:
I don't think there are many examples of any of those networks just making up a statement from a federal agency
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:48 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:48 pm to kywildcatfanone
6 downvotes for a comment with video evidence.
America 2026
America 2026
Popular
Back to top



1












