Started By
Message

re: I was a member of the jury on the Garrett Ward trial. AMA.

Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by WildBillJR
Member since Nov 2017
67 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:02 pm to
Did defense lawyer ask jurors if they had been victims of theft? I don’t know if that is allowed but would be hugely important to know
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

I have doubts

I'm sure you do, wonder why?
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5060 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

r they never got it. ??


Are you suggesting that the DA's office withheld exculpatory evidence, or are you suggesting that Ward's defense team never requested it?
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5060 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Would Ward’s family be liable to pay anything over this to the family of the deceased?


Why would parents be liable for the torts of their 20+ year old child?
Posted by Reluctantjuror
Member since Jun 2022
94 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:20 pm to
Prosecution asked during voire dire
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3730 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 4:25 pm to
It’s a long bid no doubt. 10-30 years seems like the range you’d expect for this with 20 probably being the fair number. Williams definitely wanted him nailed for obvious reasons but 30 years isn’t unreasonable in a state where murder 2 is automatic life.
Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
15171 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:00 pm to
How much wood would a wood…. Oh hell just answer
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
14729 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

The guy that broke the fight up and his girlfriend testified that Jackson was on the ground asking for help and in no condition to fight back then saw ward kick him in the head. The doctors testified that the head wound was consistent with being kicked


Yikes
Dude is a monster.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:32 pm to
Yep, total thug POS.
Posted by TomballTiger
Htown
Member since Jan 2007
3970 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 5:34 am to
Ok I’m wrong. Thanks for clarifying
Posted by TomballTiger
Htown
Member since Jan 2007
3970 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 5:42 am to
I worded that wrong. I would have sought a change of venue based on the argument that a fair trial could not be hade in OP. I’m not privy to the pre trial publicity etc but I would have tried real hard to move it.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9581 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:45 am to
quote:

And the jury resembled the demographics of the city of New Orleans.


Want to show your work there, REG861?

Per OP, the jury was 2 white 1 Asian 11 black (including 2 alternates).

Per World Population Reviews, LINK, the make up is as follow:

According to the most recent ACS, the racial composition of New Orleanswas:

Black or African American: 59.22%
White: 33.40%
Asian: 2.89%
Two or more races: 2.55%
Other race: 1.75%
Native American: 0.18%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0.01%.

If we do a quick bit of arithmetic, we get a jury of 8 black, 5 white, and 1 asian.

Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 7:58 am to
What’s the racial makeup of the folks who turned up for jury duty and didn’t get out of it?
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
37829 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Want to show your work there, REG861?


Ok it was lazy to say it was an exact match for the city’s demographics. But as we know Nola is a chocolate city. The jury being mostly black isn’t shocking. You’re not going to win an appeal based on a Batson type issue because there weren’t enough white people.
Posted by absolute692
US of A, MFer
Member since Feb 2007
4001 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 8:44 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/29/22 at 8:50 am
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
23929 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:08 am to
So I was watching first 48 yesterday. The episode was from New Orleans. A black male was charged with 2nd degree murder. With evidence, witnesses and a confession of killing an unarmed male in a robbery.
Received 20 years.

This guy beats up a homeless man, that was going through his pockets, who died weeks later, no evidence, receives 30 years hard labor.

So there was a no reasonable doubt? The jury really believed 100%?
Sounds like bullshite. Shouldn’t matter which day the knife pic came, and there was no dna test on the knife? Because he didn’t say anything to police, while still intoxicated?

Sounds like there was plenty of doubt.

30 years hard labor to rehabilitate this guy?How does this sentencing make sense?

Sounds like a “make an example” verdict and sentencing.
Posted by AlextheBodacious
Member since Oct 2020
3730 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

homeless man, that was going through his pockets

False
quote:

no evidence

False
quote:

Sounds like a “make an example” verdict and sentencing.

True
quote:

30 years hard labor to rehabilitate this guy?How does this sentencing make sense?

He’s a threat to society and is being put away for our safety not to be rehabilitated.
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6820 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:22 am to
quote:

So there was a no reasonable doubt?


Reasonable doubt to what? Ward beat the guy, fled the scene, cops picked him up hiding in a parking garage. He never denied beating Jackson. The only issue anyone is getting hung up about is whether or not Jackson was going through Ward's pocket or not (Ward's story with absolutely zero evidence).
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54838 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:25 am to
quote:

With evidence, witnesses and a confession of killing an unarmed male in a robbery.
Received 20 years.
The benefits of a plea bargain. Ward likely could have plead and gotten much less than 30 years.
Posted by UPT
NOLA
Member since May 2009
5901 posts
Posted on 6/29/22 at 9:37 am to
quote:

I would have sought a change of venue based on the argument that a fair trial could not be hade in OP.


Based on...?

Because black people?

This wasn't a very high profile case. More than most, but still, certainly not the talk of the town.

He could get just as fair of a trial here than anywhere else.
This post was edited on 6/29/22 at 9:38 am
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19 20 21 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram