- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/6/22 at 8:13 am to momentoftruth87
I read an interesting article a few years back on a phenomenon. Basically back in the late-90s a HBCU debate team won a championship by taking an interesting strategy. Basically, no matter the topic, they would pivot their response to accuse the other team of being racists. It’s an irrational argument that has nothing to do with the topic. The problem was each school took the bait and went into defending their lack of racism instead of the debate topic.
That being said, it’s the way the modern progressives operate. They propose completely irrational positions that no one can debate because they are irrational. But they also contain buzzwords that we’ve been taught are verboten, so we get caught in this if/then loop that’s unexitable. And the proposals get more absurd, and they only serve to further destabilize societal norms.
Because I believe that’s the endgame. The complete destabilization of western culture. Because it eventually will hit a breaking point and things will fall apart. And they believe that they will emerge the rulers of the world once traditional culture has died.
We are at war. We have been for years. Shots will eventually be fired.
That being said, it’s the way the modern progressives operate. They propose completely irrational positions that no one can debate because they are irrational. But they also contain buzzwords that we’ve been taught are verboten, so we get caught in this if/then loop that’s unexitable. And the proposals get more absurd, and they only serve to further destabilize societal norms.
Because I believe that’s the endgame. The complete destabilization of western culture. Because it eventually will hit a breaking point and things will fall apart. And they believe that they will emerge the rulers of the world once traditional culture has died.
We are at war. We have been for years. Shots will eventually be fired.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:14 am to momentoftruth87
Can I just be gender neutral and not have to hitch my wagon to any of you idiots?
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:17 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
We love to make uncomplicated shite complicated.
We?
Nah bro, I'm not the one with severe mental illness asking to be called all kinds of weird pronouns and shite.
That would be liberals.
Im simply not calling a man with a dick a woman because he's wearing a wig.
Im not playing that stupid play pretend game.
People that dont like that can kiss my arse. Sorry not sorry.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:20 am to armsdealer
quote:I’m not a homophobe. I just don’t need to know their sexual preferences or mental health issues. Being gay isn’t a mental disorder but thinking you’re another gender and using plural pronouns certainly is.
homophobes like you
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:21 am to biglego
quote:
The pronoun thing is really stupid.
I'm a live and let live guy but I'm also not re-learning the English language so I won't hurt someone's feelings

Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:26 am to elprez00
quote:
I read an interesting article a few years back on a phenomenon. Basically back in the late-90s a HBCU debate team won a championship by taking an interesting strategy. Basically, no matter the topic, they would pivot their response to accuse the other team of being racists. It’s an irrational argument that has nothing to do with the topic. The problem was each school took the bait and went into defending their lack of racism instead of the debate topic.
That being said, it’s the way the modern progressives operate. They propose completely irrational positions that no one can debate because they are irrational. But they also contain buzzwords that we’ve been taught are verboten, so we get caught in this if/then loop that’s unexitable. And the proposals get more absurd, and they only serve to further destabilize societal norms.
Logical arguments are ineffective when emotional appeals are constantly introduced into a debate. And nothing brings out emotion like racism/sexism/homophobia…or being baselessly accused of it.
You are probably right that destabilization is the goal.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:29 am to SPEEDY
It’s a measured progression of acceptance. By piggy backing onto previously “accepted” letters.
“Oh, I like to see two gorgeous girls kissing”
To
“ leave my 5 year old alone”.
“Oh, I like to see two gorgeous girls kissing”
To
“ leave my 5 year old alone”.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:31 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
I for incest.
quote:
Alabama
Roll Tide?
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:32 am to tigergirl10
quote:
but thinking you’re another gender and using plural pronouns certainly is.
quote:
Tigergirl10

Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:36 am to momentoftruth87
*raises hand in back
If you are a lesbian then aren’t you gay? Why the two separate letters?
If you are a lesbian then aren’t you gay? Why the two separate letters?
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:38 am to ChickennBiscuits
quote:
As a member of said community, I’m also not interested in a discussion about who I’m attracted to, though I do expect my husband to be spoken about or acknowledged just like any other spouse in conversation.
PERFECTLY REASONABLE.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:41 am to OweO
quote:
I don’t get what the Q stands for?
I think it means queer. Don't quote me on this,
It stands for Questioning. It's for people who don't know whether they are gay or hetero.
ETA: I think.

This post was edited on 3/6/22 at 9:44 am
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:43 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Why can’t we call them gay and queer like they want known?
I think queer is their preferred umbrella term. Why it hasn’t replaced the alphabet term by now is puzzling. May be because the word queer has historically been a derogative word.
quote:
I don’t understand the lgbtq thing
The one I can’t understand is the man who wants to be a woman but who prefers women sexually. They keep their dicks but “transition” otherwise. Caitlyn Jenner is an example.
I’ve also seen examples of women who convert to men physically but keep their pussies and prefer to screw men.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:48 am to momentoftruth87
The non binary/gender queer stuff really snuck up on me
I had known about it for a long time, but only due to Reddit & twitter weirdos. It was always kind of a meme.
Now I see it in real life and it’s pretty mainstream. Not sure when that happened
I had known about it for a long time, but only due to Reddit & twitter weirdos. It was always kind of a meme.
Now I see it in real life and it’s pretty mainstream. Not sure when that happened
Posted on 3/6/22 at 9:56 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
I don’t understand the lgbtq thing
It’s pretty simple. Suicide rates are absurdly high for people who don’t fit social norms. Libs are trying to change that, and their methods seem to anger and inconvenience people who want no part of it.
Posted on 3/6/22 at 10:06 am to armsdealer
Posted by armsdealer
"Because homophobes like you can't even get all of their letters right"
LMAO... And participants like you can't get their gender right
"Because homophobes like you can't even get all of their letters right"
LMAO... And participants like you can't get their gender right
Posted on 3/6/22 at 10:10 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Questioning
I lost a bet, also thinking it stood for “questioning”.
According to the Nazis that teach us tolerance at work, it stands for “queer”.
Back to top
