- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I don't believe in the sentence of life without parole.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm
Hell, I don't believe in the sentence of life with the possibility of parole. If you committed a crime serious enough to earn the sentence of life imprisonment, then you ought to just be executed then and there.
/end rant
/end rant
36
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to grizzlylongcut
It would save some money that's for sure.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:18 pm to grizzlylongcut
But are you really ready to die?
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:19 pm to grizzlylongcut
Many criminal statutes require that for the Death penalty a second felony must be included, such as murder with armed robbery.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:19 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
grizzlylongcut
do you trust the government? you must to give the ability to just kill its citizens.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:20 pm to grizzlylongcut
The U.S. prefers to waste money out of compassion on people that will never contribute to society again.
Hang them, discard them and spend that money on veteran assistance.
Hang them, discard them and spend that money on veteran assistance.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:20 pm to LSUWoodworker
I think it is actually more punishment to be a caged animal for life w/o parole. Execution is quick and painless
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:21 pm to lsu777
quote:
do you trust the government? you must to give the ability to just kill its citizens.
Convicted by a jury of your peers.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:21 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
If you committed a crime serious enough to earn the sentence of life imprisonment, then you ought to just be executed then and there.
I understand the financial commitment it puts on the state but don’t you think there’s any benefit of them rotting away in a cell for the rest of their miserable years thinking about what they’ve done? Genuinely asking, not being an arse.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:21 pm to grizzlylongcut
And appeals shouldn't last 30 or more years.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:21 pm to LSUWoodworker
quote:
I think it is actually more punishment to be a caged animal for life w/o parole.
Debatable.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:21 pm to grizzlylongcut
Life without parole with EXTREME harsh living conditions.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:22 pm to kywildcatfanone
Also, bring back farm prisons and chain gangs.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:24 pm to grizzlylongcut
Agreed….. if you are found guilty of life in prison there is no hope for you anyway. You get to see your family and get three meals a day. You can use the argument of rehab but who cares. They will never be a productive member of society again. Their victim doesn’t get a chance to see their family anymore and said family goes through a huge amount of grief that may never go away. There are to many people on death row already, and for what?????? What good are they doing for anyone except wasting resources they do not deserve.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:26 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Convicted by a jury of your peers
Those folks never frick up
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:27 pm to grizzlylongcut
On a side note, was on wikipedia the other day and saw a list of death row inmates in California. Most of them have been on death row since the 70s or 80s.
They only repealed it for a few years in the 70s(worked out great for Manson and his followers), but it doesn't look like more than 1 or 2 people have been executed in the 40+ years that it's been reinstated.
I'd just like to know why California refuses to carry out sentences and/or why they reinstated the death penalty if they had no intention of actually executing anyone.
They only repealed it for a few years in the 70s(worked out great for Manson and his followers), but it doesn't look like more than 1 or 2 people have been executed in the 40+ years that it's been reinstated.
I'd just like to know why California refuses to carry out sentences and/or why they reinstated the death penalty if they had no intention of actually executing anyone.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:28 pm to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
Life without parole with EXTREME harsh living conditions.
I could compromise with this. Make it like a Gulag for those frickers.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:28 pm to LSUWoodworker
Then we need to change how we execute people… eye for a eye… I don’t about the cruel punishment. If you shoot someone, you should be shot. If you torture someone and then cut their throat the same should happen to you.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:29 pm to LSUWoodworker
quote:
I think it is actually more punishment to be a caged animal for life w/o parole.
If you are a smoker and don't have anyone putting $ on your commissary, it might suck. Other than that, they have it pretty easy.
Posted on 10/19/21 at 1:32 pm to DaleGribble
quote:
If you are a smoker and don't have anyone putting $ on your commissary, it might suck. Other than that, they have it pretty easy.
Most state and ALL fed penitentiaries are tobacco free. Reopen Alcatraz
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News