
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How radiation to space and the lapse rate determine surface temperature (science board)
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:04 am
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:04 am
Earth's temperature profile is a coupled problem: sunlight supplies energy, radiation carries energy to space, and radiation plus convection shape the atmosphere below. A lapse rate gives temperature differences; the radiation budget helps anchor the absolute temperatures.
1. Start above the atmosphere
Earth intercepts sunlight over pi*R^2, but has surface area 4*pi*R^2. Global-average incoming sunlight is therefore S/4. If A is planetary albedo and OLR is outgoing thermal infrared radiation, conservation of energy gives, neglecting the tiny geothermal contribution: [1]
N = S*(1-A)/4 - OLR
N = (1/(4*pi*R^2))*dE/dt
E is energy stored in the Earth system. Positive N means heat accumulates; equilibrium means N = 0. With S approximately 1361 W/m^2 and A approximately 0.30:
Incoming sunlight: 340 W/m^2
Reflected sunlight: 102 W/m^2
Absorbed sunlight: 238 W/m^2
Required equilibrium OLR: 238 W/m^2
Convection and evaporation redistribute energy inside this boundary. Cooling to space occurs through radiation. Today's Earth has a positive energy imbalance; equilibrium is a teaching reference. [2]
2. Convert outgoing flux into an effective temperature
The Stefan-Boltzmann law is F = sigma*T^4. Define:
T_e = (OLR/sigma)^(1/4)
sigma = 5.6704*10^-8 W/(m^2*K^4)
For OLR approximately 238 W/m^2, T_e is approximately 255 K (-18 C). This is a blackbody-equivalent emission temperature, not the air temperature at the literal top of the atmosphere. Actual infrared escapes from many heights, depending on wavelength, clouds and location; some escapes directly from the surface. [3,4]
3. Connect that temperature to the surface
Let z increase upward and define the environmental lapse rate:
Gamma(z) = -dT/dz
T(0) = T(z_e) + integral from 0 to z_e of Gamma(z) dz
That integration is exact for a specified temperature profile. A simple effective-emission-height approximation takes T(z_e) approximately equal to T_e. If the ground and near-surface air are closely coupled:
T_surface approximately T_e + integral from 0 to z_e of Gamma(z) dz
For an illustrative constant Gamma = 6.5 K/km and z_e = 5 km:
T_surface approximately 255 + 6.5*5
= 287.5 K, approximately 14 C
Those chosen values illustrate the connection; they do not independently predict global surface temperature. Radiative transfer, convection, humidity and clouds determine the actual emission heights and profile. Ground skin temperature can differ from nearby air. [5]
For a dry adiabatic parcel, the first law and hydrostatic balance give: [6]
c_p*dT - dp/rho = 0
dp = -rho*g*dz
Gamma_dry = g/c_p, approximately 9.8 K/km
Here c_p is specific heat at constant pressure, rho is air density, and g is gravitational acceleration.
Moist convection releases latent heat; the environmental lapse rate varies. The example's 6.5 K/km is not the dry adiabatic rate. [5,6]
4. Where greenhouse gases enter
Infrared opacity determines which parts of the profile contribute radiation escaping to space. Greater opacity can shift emission toward higher, colder tropospheric air in affected spectral bands. At an unchanged temperature profile this reduces outgoing energy; warming and other adjustments then work toward restoring balance. [2,4]
Pressure and gravity help determine a temperature gradient. That gradient alone cannot set the surface's absolute temperature. Radiation, opacity and the lapse rate work together. Nor can one constant tropospheric lapse rate be extended through the stratosphere, where temperature can increase with height. [3,5]
Sources
[1] NASA: Climate and Earth's Energy Budget
[2] NASA CERES: measured radiation budget and energy imbalance
[3] Kerry Emanuel, MIT: radiation and atmospheric structure
[4] NASA GISS: infrared spectra and the greenhouse effect
[5] Brian Rose, University at Albany: radiative-convective equilibrium
[6] MIT: adiabatic lapse-rate derivation, slides 19-20
1. Start above the atmosphere
Earth intercepts sunlight over pi*R^2, but has surface area 4*pi*R^2. Global-average incoming sunlight is therefore S/4. If A is planetary albedo and OLR is outgoing thermal infrared radiation, conservation of energy gives, neglecting the tiny geothermal contribution: [1]
N = S*(1-A)/4 - OLR
N = (1/(4*pi*R^2))*dE/dt
E is energy stored in the Earth system. Positive N means heat accumulates; equilibrium means N = 0. With S approximately 1361 W/m^2 and A approximately 0.30:
Incoming sunlight: 340 W/m^2
Reflected sunlight: 102 W/m^2
Absorbed sunlight: 238 W/m^2
Required equilibrium OLR: 238 W/m^2
Convection and evaporation redistribute energy inside this boundary. Cooling to space occurs through radiation. Today's Earth has a positive energy imbalance; equilibrium is a teaching reference. [2]
2. Convert outgoing flux into an effective temperature
The Stefan-Boltzmann law is F = sigma*T^4. Define:
T_e = (OLR/sigma)^(1/4)
sigma = 5.6704*10^-8 W/(m^2*K^4)
For OLR approximately 238 W/m^2, T_e is approximately 255 K (-18 C). This is a blackbody-equivalent emission temperature, not the air temperature at the literal top of the atmosphere. Actual infrared escapes from many heights, depending on wavelength, clouds and location; some escapes directly from the surface. [3,4]
3. Connect that temperature to the surface
Let z increase upward and define the environmental lapse rate:
Gamma(z) = -dT/dz
T(0) = T(z_e) + integral from 0 to z_e of Gamma(z) dz
That integration is exact for a specified temperature profile. A simple effective-emission-height approximation takes T(z_e) approximately equal to T_e. If the ground and near-surface air are closely coupled:
T_surface approximately T_e + integral from 0 to z_e of Gamma(z) dz
For an illustrative constant Gamma = 6.5 K/km and z_e = 5 km:
T_surface approximately 255 + 6.5*5
= 287.5 K, approximately 14 C
Those chosen values illustrate the connection; they do not independently predict global surface temperature. Radiative transfer, convection, humidity and clouds determine the actual emission heights and profile. Ground skin temperature can differ from nearby air. [5]
For a dry adiabatic parcel, the first law and hydrostatic balance give: [6]
c_p*dT - dp/rho = 0
dp = -rho*g*dz
Gamma_dry = g/c_p, approximately 9.8 K/km
Here c_p is specific heat at constant pressure, rho is air density, and g is gravitational acceleration.
Moist convection releases latent heat; the environmental lapse rate varies. The example's 6.5 K/km is not the dry adiabatic rate. [5,6]
4. Where greenhouse gases enter
Infrared opacity determines which parts of the profile contribute radiation escaping to space. Greater opacity can shift emission toward higher, colder tropospheric air in affected spectral bands. At an unchanged temperature profile this reduces outgoing energy; warming and other adjustments then work toward restoring balance. [2,4]
Pressure and gravity help determine a temperature gradient. That gradient alone cannot set the surface's absolute temperature. Radiation, opacity and the lapse rate work together. Nor can one constant tropospheric lapse rate be extended through the stratosphere, where temperature can increase with height. [3,5]
Sources
[1] NASA: Climate and Earth's Energy Budget
[2] NASA CERES: measured radiation budget and energy imbalance
[3] Kerry Emanuel, MIT: radiation and atmospheric structure
[4] NASA GISS: infrared spectra and the greenhouse effect
[5] Brian Rose, University at Albany: radiative-convective equilibrium
[6] MIT: adiabatic lapse-rate derivation, slides 19-20
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:09 am to SpidermanTUba
Why are you just AI dumping random science topics? Trying to pretend to be smart?
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:10 am to SpidermanTUba
The sun dictates everything
It could kill us all with 1 solar flare.
It could kill us all with 1 solar flare.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:11 am to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:30 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
(1/(4*pi*R^2))*dE/dt
This shite right here is why I still do more complex math on a piece of paper. Math looks sooooo ugly when you type it out like that on a PC
Posted on 10/26/26 at 9:36 am to Bigdawgb
quote:
(1/(4*pi*R^2))*dE/dt
Looks more like a drunk texting after getting thrown out of a bar.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 10:55 am to BoogaBear
He hasn’t posted in 2 years then all of a sudden he’s balls to the walls posting
Posted on 10/26/26 at 11:13 am to SpidermanTUba
Good lord more manbearpig bullshite
Posted on 10/26/26 at 12:32 pm to SpidermanTUba
Mayyyyyne you so smartnshittt I’m glad you proovin it on a message bored cuz otha wize no one else would kno you kno that letter math n shite.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 12:42 pm to RockinDood
Basically he’s Matt Damon in Good Will Hunting.
Posted on 10/26/26 at 2:10 pm to SeeeeK
The Sun supplies the energy--that is S in the first equation. Reflectivity determines how much is absorbed, and infrared opacity affects how readily it escapes. The energy source alone does not set surface temperature.
For scale, Emslie et al. estimate about 4.26e25 J of total radiant energy for the enormous November 4, 2003 flare, corrected for its position near the Sun's limb. Put a flare of that size on the Earth-facing side. Using the study's uniform outward-hemisphere approximation and an explicitly assumed 10-minute pulse (r = 1.496e11 m, the Earth-Sun distance; t = 600 s):
F = E ÷ (2 × 3.14159 × r² × t)
= (4.26e25 J) ÷ [2 × 3.14159 × (1.496e11 m)² × 600 s]
about 0.505 W/m²
Ordinary sunlight at Earth's distance is about 1361 W/m². This illustrative extra flux is 0.037% of that for ten minutes, equivalent in total energy to about 0.22 seconds of normal sunshine. Both fluxes are perpendicular to the rays above the atmosphere. This is an assumed time-average, not a measured peak or a ceiling on every possible flare; the energy and angular distribution have substantial uncertainty.
That does not make space weather harmless. Flare radiation affects radio communications and astronauts; associated coronal mass ejections can threaten grids. Earth's atmosphere protects people on the ground from flare radiation. Those hazards differ from overwhelming the normal solar energy budget.
Emslie et al., section 2.2 and Tables 1-2
NASA: solar flares and their effects
NASA: solar storms and power outages
For scale, Emslie et al. estimate about 4.26e25 J of total radiant energy for the enormous November 4, 2003 flare, corrected for its position near the Sun's limb. Put a flare of that size on the Earth-facing side. Using the study's uniform outward-hemisphere approximation and an explicitly assumed 10-minute pulse (r = 1.496e11 m, the Earth-Sun distance; t = 600 s):
F = E ÷ (2 × 3.14159 × r² × t)
= (4.26e25 J) ÷ [2 × 3.14159 × (1.496e11 m)² × 600 s]
about 0.505 W/m²
Ordinary sunlight at Earth's distance is about 1361 W/m². This illustrative extra flux is 0.037% of that for ten minutes, equivalent in total energy to about 0.22 seconds of normal sunshine. Both fluxes are perpendicular to the rays above the atmosphere. This is an assumed time-average, not a measured peak or a ceiling on every possible flare; the energy and angular distribution have substantial uncertainty.
That does not make space weather harmless. Flare radiation affects radio communications and astronauts; associated coronal mass ejections can threaten grids. Earth's atmosphere protects people on the ground from flare radiation. Those hazards differ from overwhelming the normal solar energy budget.
Emslie et al., section 2.2 and Tables 1-2
NASA: solar flares and their effects
NASA: solar storms and power outages
This post was edited on 10/26/26 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/26/26 at 2:11 pm to beerJeep
In the later "Time to Get Cereal" (season 22, episode 6, 2018), ManBearPig turns out to be real and the boys have to apologize to Al Gore for ignoring his warning. The story continues in "Nobody Got Cereal?" Worth catching the sequel. :)
Official episode synopsis
Official episode synopsis

Popular
Back to top
10
















