Started By
Message

re: How long until we have a self sustaining population on another planet?

Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:25 am to
Posted by GermantownTiger
Member since Jan 2015
3337 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:25 am to
2019
Posted by 3rdgentgr
Member since Jan 2011
828 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:45 am to
never
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
66395 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:46 am to
we're already there. they're just not telling everyone yet.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17152 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:57 am to
quote:

DavidtheGnome probably could give a detailed answer. In my opinion, it probably will never happen. Just getting a person to Mars is a colossal challenge and it’d never be self sustaining.



I'm pretty sure Europe in the 1500's said the same thing about the new world. But humanity found a way....Humanity always finds a way

We actually have much of the technology to live a very difficult life on Mars. It would be disgustingly expensive but it is possible

1. Build a combination Biodome and underground network
2. Nuclear Power combined with Solar and Wind
3. Artificial light
4. Use cloning technology to "grow" the first livestock
5. The challenge is water. We would have to find a source of water large enough to sustain life. Water would need to feed crops and people as well as be used to generate O2 through electrolysis (submarines have been doing this for 60 years)

ETA: The atmosphere is made up of 98% CO2....could we possibly find a way to simulate photosynthesis on a large scale and convert CO2 to O2?
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 9:01 am
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:58 am to
quote:

How long until we could achieve that?


We first will have to create self-sustaining artificial inteligence. We are biologically bound to this planet and cannot live anywhere else.

Fully sentient AI should come into existence before 2100. We'll have to let rudimentary AI design itself. Then the process will rapidly evolve into AI with our guidance.

Only AI can move out into the Universe. Our trips to the moon and to space stations have already shown that we cannot survive longterm away from earth.

For example, Mars' gravity is only about one third that of the earth. Our bodily functions break down away from our world. Only synthetic life that has been constructed to withstand various levels of gravity will be able to travel to distant destinations.
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
9775 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:01 am to
There are no planets in our solar system capable of sustaining life, so we would either have to have teraforming technology or the ability to travel to other star systems.
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6284 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:09 am to
We don't even have space exploration missions anymore. Yeah, setting up a whole new planet of life and sustainability seems purely science fictional.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27972 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 10:17 am to
quote:

self sustaining

Never
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10512 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 11:34 am to
Never
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 11:41 am to
50 or less years. Especially if we bring fertilized embryos to increase genetic diversity and remove that problem.

Ability to gather water, ability to grow crops, and ability to generate electricity/repair equipment.. those are the three things we would primarily need in a subsurface dwelling.

It shouldn't be a problem to get resource harvesting equipment there. Bring a hundred years worth of spare parts on the front end

3D printing can take care of most problems
This post was edited on 9/12/18 at 11:54 am
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53122 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 11:42 am to
We have a ton of people that can’t sustain themselves here
Posted by SemperFiDawg
Member since Sep 2014
2282 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:02 pm to
Well first we would have to establish one here.
Posted by rickyh
Positiger Nation
Member since Dec 2003
12470 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 12:06 pm to
We need to utilize this one. It is the only one where life exists.
Posted by Tempratt
WRMS Girls Soccer Team Kicks arse
Member since Oct 2013
13442 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:36 pm to
quote:



What if, instead of interplanetary travel and colonization, we first learn to travel and colonize inter-dimensionally?



If by that you mean traveling into and colonizing parallel worlds, that would probably more difficult that developing something like a warp drive.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18682 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:41 pm to
Mars has weaker sunlight which means knew cultivars of plants need to be developed to increase productivity for Martian conditions. This also limits the effectiveness of solar technology. There is no magnetosphere on Mars which really limits what could be done on the surface beyond living in a bubble.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18682 posts
Posted on 9/12/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Only AI can move out into the Universe. Our trips to the moon and to space stations have already shown that we cannot survive longterm away from earth. For example, Mars' gravity is only about one third that of the earth. Our bodily functions break down away from our world.


I don’t think we can draw that conclusion as of yet. First, only a few hundred people have spent any significant amount of time in space. Currently Earth has over 7 billion people. There is no way that those astronauts are fully representative of the level of genetic diversity within the human population.

Yes, living in space is taxing on the body. However, there may be genetic advantages that certain populations exhibit that we have yet to realize. Not to mention, what traits would be selected for once people start reproducing in space.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 9/13/18 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I don’t think we can draw that conclusion as of yet. First, only a few hundred people have spent any significant amount of time in space. Currently Earth has over 7 billion people. There is no way that those astronauts are fully representative of the level of genetic diversity within the human population.


There can't be any genetic diversity regarding the effects of gravity on the body. All 7.6 billion humans currently living have been exposed to earth's gravity for their entire lives. Evolution has had no opportunities, or reasons, to cause adaptations to other gravitational strengths.

The structure of the human body has been crafted by evolution to withstand only our gravity. Change that gravity, or even eliminate it, and bodily processes go haywire. Muscles quickly atrophy in lower gravity. Blood pools in lower body parts in higher gravity. Gases accumulate in the blood in no gravity.

At best, humans may be able to visit local bodies such as the moon and Mars for short periods. Full time residency is not possible.

quote:

Yes, living in space is taxing on the body. However, there may be genetic advantages that certain populations exhibit that we have yet to realize.


Living in lower or higher gravity is much different than adapting to colder or warmer climates, to wetter or drier environments, or to higher altitudes. Humans have intelligence that enables us to modify our immediate environments to our needs. We can put on or take off clothes as needed to be comfortable regarding climate; dehumidify or humidify our dwellings; or use oxygen supplements at higher altitudes. There is nothing we can do to offset the effects of different gravitation levels, genetically or intellectually. Longterm exposure would be debilitating and eventually fatal.


quote:

Not to mention, what traits would be selected for once people start reproducing in space.


Evolution is a gradual and longterm change to a species' environment. A species must be able to live in a changed environment long enough for its offspring, of many generations, to optimally adapt to it. Humans can't withstand changed gravity that long.

Posted by DArbonneDuke
D'Arbonne, LA
Member since Nov 2005
1462 posts
Posted on 9/13/18 at 1:15 pm to
Mars is not the answer IMO. It will depend on our ability to conquer space travel outside our solar system to find a suitable planet with water, atmosphere, natural resources, etc. AI will play a huge roll too.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17537 posts
Posted on 9/13/18 at 1:41 pm to
Never
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11585 posts
Posted on 9/13/18 at 1:45 pm to
We don't have a self-sustaining population on THIS planet anymore. Ain't gonna do much but die off on any other one we might try to colonize.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram