Started By
Message

re: Home defense question. Legal counsel requested

Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51955 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:48 am to
The general point is the crossing of the threshold. That idea comes from what is known as the "Castle Doctrine", which says that one has the right to be safe/secure in their homes, and they do not have a duty to try to retreat from danger when within their home. Many state stand your ground laws incorporate this idea.

Here is the Louisiana statute:

(4)(a) When committed by a person lawfully inside a dwelling, a place of business, or a motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1(40), against a person who is attempting to make an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, or who has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, and the person committing the homicide reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the entry or to compel the intruder to leave the premises or motor vehicle.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49577 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:48 am to
quote:

They need to be inside of your house.





Objectively False.
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

The general point is the crossing of the threshold.


By threshold are you saying entrance to the home? Because they don't have to cross. They just have to be attempting to gain entry.

quote:

Here is the Louisiana statute:

(4)(a) When committed by a person lawfully inside a dwelling, a place of business, or a motor vehicle as defined in R.S. 32:1(40), against a person who is attempting to make an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, or who has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, and the person committing the homicide reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the entry or to compel the intruder to leave the premises or motor vehicle.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:52 am to
Always say you felt your life, or that of your family, was in danger. In such cases, you are legally allowed to defend yourself.

If you do shoot, shoot to kill, or the defense lawyer will argue you didn't have to shoot at all. No warning shots, no 'winging'.

Say as little as possible to the police. Lawyer up.
Posted by Dave lsu 89
B.R,/ Houston
Member since Jun 2016
3879 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:53 am to
In Texas, you have the right to defend not only your life but property as well, there will be legal questions but if you even catch someone in your yard you can blast them, !!!!
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I'm not the only one here wasting a ton of time on a daily basis.


Yeah, but if the partner posts here, now he knows your screen name AND your real name.

Way to go, counselor.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 10:54 am
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
23090 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Once the intruders inters the home he/she is fair game. If you shoot them outside of the home, drag them into your house ( I have been told this by several police officers) and never shoot them in the back.


Holy shite.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51955 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

By threshold are you saying entrance to the home? Because they don't have to cross. They just have to be attempting to gain entry.

That's the old saying that goes with the overall idea. Many states extend that to attempting to "cross the threshold".
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
21034 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:59 am to
If they'd opened the door.

Shoot till they're not moving, if they're still moving, reload
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34328 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:01 am to
quote:

If it's a home defense shotgun take the plug out.

quote:
Don't let the game warden catch you baw


quote:
home defense shotgun


Wow, this thread man

Is you retarded?
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58629 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Unload the mag
havent you seen the news of these guys putting 14 in someone and getting trown in jail because it was an Over use of force and showed rage. not defense.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:04 am to
quote:

The amount of people who offer up gun advice that don't know anything is staggering


The same could be said for almost any subject discussed on the board, but some responses have crossed the stupidity threshold by a large margin.
Posted by rcrdav24
Member since Jul 2015
87 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:16 am to
quote:


If you do shoot, shoot to kill, or the defense lawyer will argue you didn't have to shoot at all. No warning shots, no 'winging'.

Say as little as possible to the police. Lawyer up.


Do not tell the police you shot to kill. You tell them you felt like your life was in danger and you shot to stop the threat.
Posted by BigSquirrel
Member since Jul 2013
1880 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:19 am to
From Terd's Legal Brick: "when the conflict began, against a person who is attempting to make an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, or who has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle, and the person committing the homicide reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent the entry or to compel the intruder to leave the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle. "

If they try to gain access to your home, it's justified. I'm with everyone else though, unless the door has a window where I can see the perp's face as the life drains from his eyes, not worth shooting.
Posted by MLCLyons
Member since Nov 2012
4793 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

With a wife and young family, idk if I could wait that long. Would probably take my chances and fight it in court if necessary.

My biggest fear would be not knowing how many intruders there were. Hopefully if you knocked one of their boys down with the shotgun, the rest would make a business decision and bounce. So many points of entry to a house though...


Or you could yell "Police are on the way, and I will shoot if you come through the door". Why would you hide silently and wait to ambush someone?
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:43 am to
quote:

They need to be inside of your house.


I dont know why you are getting downvoted, you are correct. People here need to read carefully...

1) The person against whom deadly force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering or had unlawfully and forcibly entered the dwelling, place of business, or motor vehicle.

....

in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering or had unlawfully and forcibly entered

....

forcibly entering or had unlawfully and forcibly entered

....

entering ...entered



Standing outside your threshold or jiggling your door handle from the outside can in no way be construed to mean entering or entered

Entered is self explanatory. Entering is the process of entered. "In the process of entering" would be stepping into the house. In the act of stepping into the house. Leaning into and through a car window is entering. Pulling on the door handle to a car is not entering. Its attempting to gain entry.

We can dice and slice words and argue semantics all day long and that is exactly what a prosecutor will try to do...and they do it all day...and theyre very good at it.

Play it safe. Wait until they take that first step into your house.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 11:51 am
Posted by nola000
Lacombe, LA
Member since Dec 2014
13139 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

How can you truthfully say you feared for your life if you don't even know what is there?


That is not the standard applied in this scenario. That standard applies mostly in public spaces or private spaces that arent your own. In your own motor vehicle, business or residence the standard is whether or not the individual killed was unlawfully in or entering those places and you knew they were there unlawfully.

This is one of the reasons I love LA. The lawmakers here very much respect private property, so much so that just the act of someone entering your dwelling or even your vehicle gives you full legal sanction to end their life without question or caveat.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 11:58 am
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36662 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

How can you truthfully say you feared for your life if you don't even know what is there?


Well I know for a fact bigfoot is real and likes to enter homes in the middle of the night, saw it on History channel so I know it's not fake. I'd put the chances of bigfoot being on the other side of the door over 80%.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36662 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3780 posts
Posted on 5/11/17 at 12:14 pm to
I believe they have to cross the threshold.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram