
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Full French filmmaker footage from 9/11 posted on Youtube
Posted on 9/16/26 at 2:41 pm to blueboy
Posted on 9/16/26 at 2:41 pm to blueboy
quote:
Yeah, it burned in a totally even manner before collapsing like a controlled demolition. And the BBC reported that it collapsed before it collapsed, with building 7 in the background. And you call US stupid.
because you are stupid
Posted on 9/16/26 at 2:47 pm to Roberteaux
Because to believe otherwise would destroy your grip on reality. 
Posted on 9/16/26 at 2:55 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
If too many go up then you’re losing your resources which are your personnel
There’s no perfect procedure for this
There’s no perfect procedure for this
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:05 pm to blueboy
Why did you pick a video that doesn't show the beginning of the collapse? To suit your point. When the whole video is viewed it's obvious internal supports weakened and gave way and the top left corner failed first. You can see windows breaking as the floors buckeled. Implosions start from the bottom up. Nevermind WTC1 fell right near it and fires burned in it unopposed for hours.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:13 pm to sgallo3
quote:
the passports weren't destroyed so they could find them in the rubble and blame those responsible
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:29 pm to Saintsisit
quote:Yeah, all at once. You bet.
When the whole video is viewed it's obvious internal supports weakened and gave way
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:35 pm to blueboy
Look, im no structural engineer, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but like I said in an earlier post. Yall whole premise for 7 is that it was planned. How did they KNOW that 1 & 2 would collapse. If they didn't what then, blowing up 7 would look stupid at that point.
So you're saying they came up with this elaborate plan and HOPED 1& 2 would collapse to sell it? Think this through.
So you're saying they came up with this elaborate plan and HOPED 1& 2 would collapse to sell it? Think this through.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:52 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
However, a top member of former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's entourage claimed that the video was taken out of context.
quote:
"The videos of [them] laughing are not true. I was standing next to them the whole time," tweeted Michael Ragusa, reportedly head of Giuliani's security as of 2025, according to WPIX-11. "The camera just caught her greeting him hello. Multiple other politicians were laughing and joking behind me. Republicans and Democrats."
In all fairness, there were no pictures of Donald Trump taken smiling at the 9-11 memorial in Manhattan that day. He was taking a nap - at a memorial service in Washington. He also couldn’t bother to attend the Manhattan memorial with the four other living Presidents because they wouldn’t let him (Trump) make a speech.
I don’t care for AOC and Mandami’s politics. But the need to make up falsehoods about them is bordering on ridiculous.
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:04 pm to Saintsisit
Yes, it absolutely indicates that some people had foreknowledge of the entire thing. Our government has done some pretty evil things for less. Think of the United Fruit situation in the 50's. That's confirmed, not a conspiracy theory, and the whole thing was over bananas.
If our government was willing to do that in the 1950's over bananas, what do you suppose they're willing to do today for something they really care about? Like say, Israel? Or the desire to pass the same mass surveillance laws they failed to pass in the 90's. Or both, and a lot more.
I think y'all just don't want to believe this because if you do, you've accepted the fact that our society is fricked. I lived and worked up there. There are no good guys, quite the opposite, and no one is coming to save us.
If our government was willing to do that in the 1950's over bananas, what do you suppose they're willing to do today for something they really care about? Like say, Israel? Or the desire to pass the same mass surveillance laws they failed to pass in the 90's. Or both, and a lot more.
I think y'all just don't want to believe this because if you do, you've accepted the fact that our society is fricked. I lived and worked up there. There are no good guys, quite the opposite, and no one is coming to save us.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:11 pm to Harry Caray
People need to frickin think about that shite long and hard. Don’t frickin complain you idiots you got what you wanted
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:13 pm to blueboy
You're talking in circles. None of that answers what I questioned in my post about explosives in 7.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:24 pm to blueboy
quote:
if you do, you've accepted the fact that our society is fricked
I already believe that without having to believe in your internet theories.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:26 pm to Saintsisit
It never ceases to amaze me how the idiot conspiracy theorists come out of the woodwork. I don't know how some people can even function being that moronic.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:53 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Explain how tower 7 collapsed. It wasnt hit by any plane. The official story was fires weakened it to collapse. Those Japanese skyscrapers had much worse fires than anything tower 7 experienced.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:59 pm to supatigah
I'm glad they put colors in it so the dummys can follow better.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:01 pm to blueboy
quote:
blueboy
quote:
shallo3
Anyone care to dispute the video above? We're waiting.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:20 pm to Saintsisit
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
It's 'dummies,' btw.
quote:
Core Conclusion: Fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7; instead, the study concluded the collapse was a global failure requiring near-simultaneous failure of every column
quote:Me watch video. Me like colors. Me smart.
dummys
It's 'dummies,' btw.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:21 pm to Saintsisit
Controlled demolition is such an easily debunked theory. I've worked in a high rise for 25 years. If you had a crew of workers wiring such a building, the building tenants would see it. They would ask about it. Same with the property managers and maintenance workers. You can't do that kind of work in secret, unless the building is vacant, which the WTC buildings definitely were not.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:31 pm to blueboy
So you found a quack like you to agree with. The consensus is his study was flawed.
That still doesn't answer, what if 1& 2 never collapsed, then what would they have done in this genius plan to hide something in 7 by demolishing it?
You're spitting in the faces of the dead and 1st responders by acting like their own government did this.

That still doesn't answer, what if 1& 2 never collapsed, then what would they have done in this genius plan to hide something in 7 by demolishing it?
You're spitting in the faces of the dead and 1st responders by acting like their own government did this.


Popular
Back to top


1








