1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Full French filmmaker footage from 9/11 posted on Youtube
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:18 am to sgallo3
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:18 am to sgallo3
Those also weren't hit by a 300,000 pound plane going 400 knots with 80,000 pounds of fuel on board.
The twin towers took a very hard hit prior to burning. With the way the buildings were made, the tower 1 plane would have heavily damaged the core by basicslly shooting it with a shotgun of high speed debris and burning fuel. Tower 2 plane busted two sides worth of outter supporting structure. Its really amazing that they didnt collapse immediately.
The twin towers took a very hard hit prior to burning. With the way the buildings were made, the tower 1 plane would have heavily damaged the core by basicslly shooting it with a shotgun of high speed debris and burning fuel. Tower 2 plane busted two sides worth of outter supporting structure. Its really amazing that they didnt collapse immediately.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:23 am to sgallo3
quote:
How can anyone believe multiple japanese skyscrapers can withstand blazing infernos for days yet tower 7 falls after mere hours
it's been explained, you just refuse to accept it.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:37 am to Roberteaux
quote:
quote:
How can anyone believe multiple japanese skyscrapers can withstand blazing infernos for days yet tower 7 falls after mere hours
it's been explained, you just refuse to accept it.
Because the explanation doesnt hold up to scrutiny.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. These buildings burned like this for 48+ hours and none of them fell.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:38 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
And an inferno where pockets of fire were estimated to be near 2,000 degrees. Multiple floors above the impact zone had collapsed.
Yet some people refuse to believe lol
Yet some people refuse to believe lol
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:42 am to sgallo3
You have to be trolling, have to be
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:47 am to blueboy
quote:
I can't believe people accept the official narrative on 7.
Remember, a guy who could barely fly a Cessna was able to perform an extremely complex maneuver that most experienced pilots couldn't do in a simulator, and "hit" the Pentagon.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:48 am to Mushroom1968
quote:
You have to be trolling, have to be
Explain how tower 7 collapsed. It wasnt hit by any plane. The official story was fires weakened it to collapse. Those Japanese skyscrapers had much worse fires than anything tower 7 experienced.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Silverstein pulled it because he would rather the insurance payout for the building collapsing than having to pay to renovate the entire thing
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 9:52 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:51 am to sgallo3
quote:
Because the explanation doesnt hold up to scrutiny.
Yes it does, easily. You just have no comprehension of physics, material science, architecture, or any of the technical aspects of what happened.
Or, youre trolling.
Do you conspiracy nut jobs seriously think that every engineer on earth has been silenced by some inner government illuminati group to cover something up here? You can debate the governments culpability in failing to stop it all day, but what happened when the planes hit the buildings and after is pure physics and architectural engineering and it all tracks. They got smoked by big arse planes going very fast and heavily laden with fuel. There was no intentional demolition of any building outside of the plane being flown into the side of it.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:53 am to migui8618
quote:
Remember, a guy who could barely fly a Cessna was able to perform an extremely complex maneuver that most experienced pilots couldn't do in a simulator, and "hit" the Pentagon.
He missed. He hit the ground infront of it.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:53 am to blueboy
quote:
covered up that tower 7, which wasnt hit by a plane, was a controlled demolition.
I can't believe people accept the official narrative on 7.
And the poster called you stupid.
They can't separate the emotion of innocent people dying and the possibility the US could have known, suspected, or been directly involved. Even with things they have seen in their lifetime that prove how much DC has a disregard for Americans.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:55 am to BluegrassCardinal
quote:
And an inferno where pockets of fire were estimated to be near 2,000 degrees. Multiple floors above the impact zone had collapsed.
How can office furniture and jet fuel get to 2,000 degrees in less than 2 hours? Those are steel foundry temperatures and the vast majority of the jet fuel burned off in a flash point. Neither have the energy to get anywhere close to that.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:56 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
He missed. He hit the ground infront of it.
Not per the security camera footage.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:57 am to migui8618
quote:
Remember, a guy who could barely fly a Cessna was able to perform an extremely complex maneuver that most experienced pilots couldn't do in a simulator, and "hit" the Pentagon.
Is the "extremely complex maneuver" crashing it into the ground? Because I'm pretty sure I could manage to do that, and I've never flown a plane in my life.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:01 am to migui8618
Theres a poster here who was there and can confirm the plane hit the ground. It likely hit the building and the ground almost simultaneously. Do you know thats where he was aiming? Maybe he was trying to hit the other side and was 500 feet short?
Its laughable to suggest that professional pilots couldn't hit the Pentagon. Its huge.
Its laughable to suggest that professional pilots couldn't hit the Pentagon. Its huge.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:03 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
Is the "extremely complex maneuver" crashing it into the ground? Because I'm pretty sure I could manage to do that, and I've never flown a plane in my life.
The security camera footage is quite clear, whatever it was, didn't crash into the ground. Are you guys on meds? It didn't skid, didn't crash, didn't cartwheel. Right in.
Show me where it hit the ground?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:13 am to migui8618
quote:
The security camera footage is quite clear, whatever it was, didn't crash into the ground. Are you guys on meds? It didn't skid, didn't crash, didn't cartwheel. Right in.
quote:
Show me where it hit the ground?
I'm saying it basically hits the Pentagon at ground level, i.e. the ground. It wasn't even flying into a (fairly) slim, tall building. It's almost literally crashing the plane into a giant building on the ground, which seemingly wouldn't take much skill at all IMO.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:15 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:18 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
We had a tv at the office in the conference room. I would peek in and see what's happening. Someone's son was in there watching it. I go in about 11 or so and it's a smoking pile of rubble with the walls sticking up.
Me: the top fall off?
Kid: no they feel down.
Me: the whole building? Which one?
Kid: both of them.
Me: wtf?
Me: the top fall off?
Kid: no they feel down.
Me: the whole building? Which one?
Kid: both of them.
Me: wtf?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:19 am to migui8618
No. Im not arguing you with you nutjobs. Ill take the first hand account of the guy who was there, which to head off the "akktuallllyyyy" bullshite of you fat neckbeards, I may not have gotten 100% correct.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:24 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
I'm saying it basically hits the Pentagon at ground level, i.e. the ground. It wasn't even flying into a (fairly) slim, tall building. It's almost literally crashing the plane into a giant building on the ground, which seemingly wouldn't take much skill at all IMO.
Eyewitness reports are all over the place, they claim it skidded, cartwheeled, etc. It did none of that. Ground and building at the same time is a DIRECT hit of the building. Whatever it was didn't miss. At all.
a 330 degree turn at over 500 miles per hour into the side of a building is incredibly complex. Don't give me that Mick West shite.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News