- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For all the Millennials crying about housing costs, here you go
Posted on 5/14/26 at 4:12 am to Kansas City King
Posted on 5/14/26 at 4:12 am to Kansas City King
quote:Ah, yes.
Boomers getting to buy a house and a 4 year college degree for peanuts and then using all the extra money to invest to get even more money must have been nice.
It must have been nice.
I've read about those magical wonderland days in storybooks.
The days of 1480 sq ft castles filled with married couples and two happy kids, all enjoying the absolute finest linoleum floors, formica counters, genuine naugahyde fabrics, tube TVs which with the right antenna could get up to 5 stations, 14cu-ft fridges, hollow 5lb doors, and some places even had two-car garages.
Yep, it sounds like those were the days. It was everything the modern millennial seeks, but cannot have.
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 4:19 am
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:14 am to NC_Tigah
Look at all these affordable houses you avocado toast eating, macha latte drinking millennials could be the owners of but you’re too spoiled!
With the avg. price of $323,973 on these 32 homes listed in Metairie, that are probably anywhere from 30-60 years old and surely won’t have any maintenance issues, and with a low down payment of $32.3k, you’re looking at an affordable monthly note in the ballpark of $2,250!
(Including property taxes and insurance)
This gets you a 3 bed 2 bath (maybe) 1,500 sq. ft. 40 year old home in today’s economy, just feel lucky because when boomers bought their first home, their interest rate was about 15%!!!
With the avg. price of $323,973 on these 32 homes listed in Metairie, that are probably anywhere from 30-60 years old and surely won’t have any maintenance issues, and with a low down payment of $32.3k, you’re looking at an affordable monthly note in the ballpark of $2,250!
(Including property taxes and insurance)
This gets you a 3 bed 2 bath (maybe) 1,500 sq. ft. 40 year old home in today’s economy, just feel lucky because when boomers bought their first home, their interest rate was about 15%!!!
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 5:19 am
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:52 am to NC_Tigah
A lot of these are really bad examples of affordable homes lol.
You posted homes being listed for over $300/sqft
Hell one of them is over 400/sqft
You posted homes being listed for over $300/sqft
Hell one of them is over 400/sqft
Posted on 5/14/26 at 7:23 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:Yep. I know.
A lot of these are really bad examples of affordable homes lol.
They always are really bad examples.
Always.
So ... $250K-$300K homes are now out-of-range because ... well ... just because ... and ... you know ...like ... there are people on TikTok ... like ... doing selfies from nicer homes.
Look, I hate all the generational stereotyping, because as with any stereotypes, there are often stark outliers. But since this is yet another thread going that direction, here's the deal JK:
Home prices back in the überutopian 1975-1995 timeframe were influenced by several things by comparison to 2006-2026. Among those factors were higher interest rates, smaller house size, far poorer construction and materials, and piss poor homeowner income by today's standards.
By comparison, the ZIRP decade (2009-19) provided an unprecedented period of home affordability. The affordability effect hit "starter homes" in particular. Millennial interest in social-urban lifestyle increased, and interest in suburban ownership waned, and with it demand vs supply declined.
That all changed during Covid, when urban lifestyle became a social "drag."
Millennials flocking to suburbia pushed house demand for the first time in a decade. Unfortunately, inflation hit concomitantly. As demand pushed home prices higher, inflation pushed home loan interest rates higher as well.
So suddenly, midway through the Biden administration, plummeting home affordability was a real and legitimate problem. That remains the case today.
Your OP home is absurdly priced.
No question about it.
Likewise, your arm observations about the price per square foot of homes in the current list are not unreasonable. We are currently in a housing bubble. It is not a great time for buyers in any category. But it is particularly difficult for first time buyers. At the same time, insinuating that $850,000 is a "starter home" nowadays is silly. That was the point of my response.
But GenY had its bite at the Apple and decided against taking it. During the decade of affordability, GenY stereotypically chose social experiences over being "house poor." They also delayed other life decisions on the same premise, for example, pushing marriage back, or eliminating it altogether from their game plan.
All that is fine and good, but it predictably came with future financial ramifications. Millennials uniquely seem to have been unconcerned about those ramifications. Now when the chickens have come home to roost, there are loud wails, complaints of unfairness, and intergenerational penis envy.
My empathy goes to GenZ, currently exposed to 10% unemployment, and a house-price bubble in the aftermath of the ZIRP period, which they, unlike millennials, never had an opportunity to take advantage of.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 8:18 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So suddenly, midway through the Biden administration, plummeting home affordability was a real and legitimate problem. That remains the case today.
It was going to happen regardless of who was in office. 2020 rate drops that followed a decade+ of low rates and low inventory/new inventory
Rates should have raised during Obama second or trumps first term but the fed sat on their arse
Posted on 5/14/26 at 9:12 am to Dire Wolf
quote:You may not be familiar with Fed actions during T45. IIRC the Fed increased rates 7 times from Trump's election to the outset of COVID. Those actions were relatively independent of inflation, and effectively put brakes on economic growth which would otherwise have accompanied T45's economic program.
Rates should have raised during Obama second or trumps first term but the fed sat on their arse
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 9:13 am
Posted on 5/14/26 at 9:29 am to NC_Tigah
Homeowners insurance makes affordable starter homes, unaffordable in most places in SELA.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 9:30 am to NC_Tigah
Also cut rates 3 times before 2020’s cut
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 9:31 am
Posted on 5/14/26 at 10:10 am to JohnnyKilroy
Check out the sales history on that house. A Boomer bought that house in 1985 for $80,000 and sold it in 2024 for $730,000.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 10:22 am to UFFan
quote:
It's really just a further indication of how ridiculously stupid the average housing buyer is today.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 10:39 am to The Boat
quote:
A Boomer bought that house in 1985 for $80,000 and sold it in 2024 for $730,000
Hell yea
Posted on 5/14/26 at 11:05 am to deltaland
quote:This entire concept of the boomer wealth transfer is as debunked as the gender pay gap.
You do realize when boomers die all that cash and property will be left to wait for it
The younger generations. And they won’t have to even work for it. Though the boomers who sell their properties to private equity firms can frick right off. But on the flip side I’ve seen many spoiled millenials who could inherit a successful business built by a boomer and run it but they don’t want to do that much work.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 11:08 am to Scruffy
not gonna be any “wealth transfer” when I die. I’ll donate the house to someone to run a dog shelter, and bounce my last check at the funeral home
Posted on 5/14/26 at 11:19 am to jnethe1
quote:
Boomers have legitimately ruined a lot and allowed a lot of crap to be pushed down the road so their children have to deal with it.
I always love the crying and wailing about "boomers" when I'm sunset Gen X, almost Millennial, and have never had any of these Boomer Barriers in front of me my whole life.
It's going to be funny watching Millennials not just hand their money over to their kids and have the audacity of selling real property for more than they paid for it.
It's also funny that millennials and later will cry about boomers wasting their money and not giving it to them when they subscribe to content of millennial and Gen Z content creators that destroy perfectly good vehicles and other property for fun.
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 11:23 am
Posted on 5/14/26 at 11:21 am to CleverUserName
“give someone else a chance!!!!” 
Posted on 5/14/26 at 1:25 pm to The Boat
And that same $80,000 invested at the S&P historical rate of return of 10% would have been worth over $3,000,000 by 2024. That's not a very good argument.
Posted on 5/14/26 at 1:32 pm to lazlodawg
quote:sure it is. You have to live somewhere
That's not a very good argument
Posted on 5/14/26 at 5:43 pm to lazlodawg
quote:
And that same $80,000 invested at the S&P historical rate of return of 10% would have been worth over $3,000,000 by 2024. That's not a very good argument.
What are you talking about. Not many people are getting an 800% return on their primary residence when they sell it. You can get an 800% return on your house while you’ve also been investing in the markets your whole life.
This post was edited on 5/14/26 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 5/14/26 at 6:59 pm to lazlodawg
quote:
And that same $80,000 invested at the S&P historical rate of return of 10% would have been worth over $3,000,000 by 2024. That's not a very good argument.
Sweet jesus
Posted on 5/14/26 at 7:51 pm to CleverUserName
The cost of living has raised far more than wages. Is that correct?
Popular
Back to top



4





