- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Feds now proposing up to 58mpg average by 2032
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:31 pm to TigersnJeeps
0.5% of cars get that right now 

Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to TigersnJeeps
Where my Prius baws at?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to TigersnJeeps
Will they be limiting things to Vespa scooters?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to TigersnJeeps
If they really wanted to get serious and stop fricking the environment they'd go for 69mpg. 

Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to TigersnJeeps
Federal govt trying to end ownership of guns, real estate, and autos for most of the middle class.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:32 pm to TigersnJeeps
They want to force manufacturers to abandon ICE.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:33 pm to TigersnJeeps
quote:2024 is right around the corner, obviously. They need a miracle for this to hit.
With previously passed CAFE rules for 2024 through 2026 requiring a fleet average of 49 mpg by 2026, the feds are essentially asking for a fleet average of 58 miles per gallon by 2032.
What happens when it doesn't happen?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:34 pm to TigersnJeeps
quote:
Overall, the NHTSA says its proposal would save around 88 billion gallons of gasoline from now until 2050, equating to savings of $52 billion or a reduction in carbon-dioxide emissions of 900 million tons.
This just seems like chicken scratch, correct?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:34 pm to TigersnJeeps
Those fricks would love to have us peddling with our feet like the Flintstones
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:36 pm to TigersnJeeps
The goal is to kill car ownership. They know this is ridiculous and that's the point.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:36 pm to nes2010
quote:This is a by-product, the goal is control of citizens. It’s very easy to see.
They want to force manufacturers to abandon ICE.

Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:37 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
for most of the middle class.
ALL the middle class. Only folks with autos will be very high income earners.
Poor and middle will live in tiny apartments in the city while the rich will live in mansions outside of the city and will helicopter in.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:38 pm to TigersnJeeps
So much for "free markets".
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:40 pm to Deactived
quote:If my math is right.... I just looked up consumption and in 2021 the US used 135 billion gallons. If this plan saves a total of 88 billion gallons total by 2050 that's about 3.25 billion gallons per year. (2-2.5 percent)
This just seems like chicken scratch, correct?
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:41 pm to TigersnJeeps
So, look at who is invested in Cobalt and Lithium concerns. This is driving this as much as the enviros.
Also if you wonder how lifelong doves in congress turned in to warhawks over Ukraine,
Look at the potential reserves of Lithium and Cobalt in Ukraine.
Also if you wonder how lifelong doves in congress turned in to warhawks over Ukraine,
Look at the potential reserves of Lithium and Cobalt in Ukraine.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:46 pm to TigersnJeeps
Our government no longer represents us. It now seeks only to rule us.
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:46 pm to TigersnJeeps
should make my gas bill cheaper, oh well not my problem
Posted on 8/1/23 at 12:52 pm to TigersnJeeps
I’m not sure why anyone thinks it’s a bad idea to push initiatives for more efficiency and lower fuel consumption.
Popular
Back to top
