- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Fast Food Workers: You Don’t Deserve $15 an Hour to Flip Burgers and That’s OK"
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:24 am to Eurocat
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:24 am to Eurocat
quote:What exactly does this accomplish? Wage rates and profit levels are separate entities. Regardless of how profitable a company is, it makes no sense to pay a worker more than what he produces in value.
Introduce an "income cap" for franchises, that no franchisee can make more than 20 times what the lowest paid full time employee makes.
The worker earned what he produced. That is called a wage. The investors and the creditors, who are responsible for the capital investment, deserve the rest.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:29 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Why would it require 4 people to make a meal? That seems like an awful lot of people to put fries in a bag and meat on a bun....
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:32 am to Eurocat
quote:
This has to be a several part project. 1. Raise the wage to 15 dollars. 2. Legislation to outlaw factory like production of food. Say that each meal that is made has to be produced by at least four people (to prevent job losses). 3. Governmental subsidies for franchises in the interim transition period, three years. 4. Introduce an "income cap" for franchises, that no franchisee can make more than 20 times what the lowest paid full time employee makes. 5. Mandatory health care coverage. Then this can go through. Just raising a salary to 15 is a shallow attempt to create a just result.
Solid troll.
6/10
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:36 am to tylercsbn9
LINK
Many families are dependent upon fast food wages. Sixty-eight percent are not in school and are single or married adults with or without children, according to the U.C. Berkeley-University of Illinois study. Only 32 percent of the workforce is younger than 23 years of age.
The low wages amount to poverty pay. According to Wider Opportunities for Women, a nonprofit women’s advocacy organization, a full-time wage of $14.17 is needed to live above subsistence levels, according to national averages. In order to make ends meet, 52 percent of fast food workers are enrolled in public benefits programs, according to the U.C. Berkeley-University of Illinois study, at an estimated annual cost of $7 billion to the American taxpayer. Taxpayers provide $1.2 billion to McDonald’s workers alone so that they can hope to achieve a subsistence standard of living. At the expense of its workers and the taxpaying public, the company has managed to privatize its profits while socializing its costs.
Both Major and Cabral mentioned employer intimidation as a primary reason for the still limited participation of their co-workers in the movement. Neither has seen anybody fired for participating in union activity, but they have heard managers disparage unions and broadly threaten workers who would join one, activities that are illegal under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Employers capitalize on their employees’ precarious situations because they can get away with it.
“Due to getting minimum wage and living paycheck to paycheck, people are scared, and then managers misinform them and threaten them,” Cabral said. “Some people are scared to be out of a job for one week. If you are out of a job for one week, sometimes you end up in a homeless shelter because you cannot pay your bills.”
Many families are dependent upon fast food wages. Sixty-eight percent are not in school and are single or married adults with or without children, according to the U.C. Berkeley-University of Illinois study. Only 32 percent of the workforce is younger than 23 years of age.
The low wages amount to poverty pay. According to Wider Opportunities for Women, a nonprofit women’s advocacy organization, a full-time wage of $14.17 is needed to live above subsistence levels, according to national averages. In order to make ends meet, 52 percent of fast food workers are enrolled in public benefits programs, according to the U.C. Berkeley-University of Illinois study, at an estimated annual cost of $7 billion to the American taxpayer. Taxpayers provide $1.2 billion to McDonald’s workers alone so that they can hope to achieve a subsistence standard of living. At the expense of its workers and the taxpaying public, the company has managed to privatize its profits while socializing its costs.
Both Major and Cabral mentioned employer intimidation as a primary reason for the still limited participation of their co-workers in the movement. Neither has seen anybody fired for participating in union activity, but they have heard managers disparage unions and broadly threaten workers who would join one, activities that are illegal under the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Employers capitalize on their employees’ precarious situations because they can get away with it.
“Due to getting minimum wage and living paycheck to paycheck, people are scared, and then managers misinform them and threaten them,” Cabral said. “Some people are scared to be out of a job for one week. If you are out of a job for one week, sometimes you end up in a homeless shelter because you cannot pay your bills.”
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:41 am to Eurocat
UC berkeley studies can be a little bit left leaning.....like left of Jesus Christ.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 12:43 am
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:47 am to Eurocat
quote:Do you even have an idea of what wage rates represent? Businesses are not piggy banks. They pay people about the value that they bring to the company. The fact of the matter is that equipment, capital, and technology is far more valuable to fast food joints than the workers. They don't really add much value to each product, so their wages are low.
Eurocat
If we as a society think that those with low marginal productivity capabilities should get government assistance, that is a separate issue.
But, Eurocat, you really need to realize that fast food workers are not paid poverty wages because of irrational whims of businessmen, they are payed poverty wages because, well, their skills don't really contribute all that much to consumer surplus.
If society wants to give these people extra money, they do it through welfare and social programs. It is completely unfair to make businesses shoulder the increased cost because society thinks workers are underpaid.
Eurocat, if you and your friends are so concerned about the low pay of fast food workers, then continue to advocate for safety nets. Don't arbitrarily penalize businesses who merely exist to make final products more valuable than the resources used to make the product.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:05 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I am a small-medium size business owner.
I am greedy.
A minimum wage will force me to be less greedy.
It is that simple.
By the way this is not a theoretical example. I really am a small business owner. Yes everyone, have a heart attack. I am a mom and pop guy advocating for a higher minimum wage. I also would have no problem with a ratio of what I earn being set to my lowest paid employee. As long as that is in force everywhere, including Wall Street, law firms, etc.
A movement for such a wage system is gathering rapid support in France and Croatia.
I am greedy.
A minimum wage will force me to be less greedy.
It is that simple.
By the way this is not a theoretical example. I really am a small business owner. Yes everyone, have a heart attack. I am a mom and pop guy advocating for a higher minimum wage. I also would have no problem with a ratio of what I earn being set to my lowest paid employee. As long as that is in force everywhere, including Wall Street, law firms, etc.
A movement for such a wage system is gathering rapid support in France and Croatia.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 2:07 am to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
I chose a career that I knew would for the most part pay me enough to live above the poverty line.
13 years later with a flawless work record, 100s of hours of continuing education and training, and now a fry cook that can barely read or write and on parole wants to be paid almost as much as me
if they get 15 dollars a hour, work 40 hours a week, and 50 weeks a year they can make as much as 30k a year. that seems unlikely because most fast food companies don''t let their employees work 40 hours per week at a single job.
if you've worked as hard as you think you have you should surely be doing a bit better than 30k a year by now.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 2:23 am to molsusports
The people that deserve $15/hr are making it. They are in a management position, they don't show up late, they don't call off once a week, they don't steal, they are reliable workers. Any restaurant in this country would be willing to pay people that money if they deserve it. Problem is it is hard to find people that work that hard. There is a reason they make $8/hr and bounce around from job to job. They suck.
Here is something to think about. If burger king has to have two idiots working a fryer at $8/hr they are paying $16/hr for that. Wouldn't they rather pay one person $15/hr to do the same if not better job?
Here is something to think about. If burger king has to have two idiots working a fryer at $8/hr they are paying $16/hr for that. Wouldn't they rather pay one person $15/hr to do the same if not better job?
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 2:28 am
Posted on 4/17/15 at 2:31 am to dgnx6
there are obviously less than perfect employees working at fast food restaurants but there are also people who were downsized and landed there either temporarily or much longer than they hoped.
the reliable workers don't all make reasonable wages. the employer generally has an incentive to pay them as little as possible when they are high school kids too naive to know they have options or older people who lost their jobs and can't find more skill appropriate positions.
the reliable workers don't all make reasonable wages. the employer generally has an incentive to pay them as little as possible when they are high school kids too naive to know they have options or older people who lost their jobs and can't find more skill appropriate positions.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:27 am to Eurocat
quote:
and are single or married adults with or without children
You know that is 99.99999% of any population, right? I would say 100%, but nothing is ever 100%.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:32 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
If wages go up this much then say bye bye fast food workers. They will find a way to automate the whole place with only needing one or two employees
And no machine is going to lick your taco shells or hock a snotball onto your burger.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:36 am to Eurocat
quote:
A minimum wage will force me to be less greedy.
Then pay more you selfish prick
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:48 am to Eurocat
quote:
I am a small-medium size business owner.
I am greedy.
A minimum wage will force me to be less greedy.
It is that simple.
Obviously I have no idea what kind of business you own and operate, but what's stopping you from being less greedy and paying your employees more TODAY?
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:50 am to Grim
I just want a fricking straw with my meal everytime. I shouldn't have to ask for a straw when a meal is ordered to go and a drink is included in the meal. frick 
Posted on 4/17/15 at 6:52 am to Eurocat
quote:
I am a small-medium size business owner.
I am greedy.
A minimum wage will force me to be less greedy.
Wow, so you're admitting you need the gov't to intervene in order for you to have a moral compass. That's pretty sad. You are so weak willed that you can't do something without the gov't forcing you to.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 7:09 am to rintintin
Would there be a big problem with the managers just firing these worthless employees while they strike? And hire any high school kid to take their place?
Posted on 4/17/15 at 7:14 am to bmy
quote:
I've worked fast food and I worked at a yogurt shop that paid $2/hour more. For less work.. much less. Like 1000% less. Do they not have the right to protest their wages? I'd say fair compensation for the position is probably around $9-12/hr depending on location.
It's not a skill. Most of these people push buttons with pictures on them b/c they don't have the skill to count and or deal with numbers. This same machine more than likely spits out the coins for the change...
You realize that someone with a specialized degree (nurse) that requires them to care for and save lives start out at $22-23 an hour right now in most cities. So, you are okay with paying someone who doesn't have an high school education or the ability to do simple math only $5-$7 less an hour?
They are going to turn these places into Walmart and then they are really going to be screwed. Will have them working 15hrs a week with no benefits keeping them at the same level of pay. Just hiring more of them.
Just like everyone else says, you want to get paid more? get an education and quit having kids/partying. If you make that much money you can go to school for free and work. I paid for my own school ( no grants) with loans and I'm doing not bad.... Not OT rich but I'd say I'm pretty comfortable.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 7:29 am to Eurocat
quote:
This has to be a several part project.
1. Raise the wage to 15 dollars.
2. Legislation to outlaw factory like production of food. Say that each meal that is made has to be produced by at least four people (to prevent job losses).
3. Governmental subsidies for franchises in the interim transition period, three years.
4. Introduce an "income cap" for franchises, that no franchisee can make more than 20 times what the lowest paid full time employee makes.
5. Mandatory health care coverage.
Then this can go through.
Just raising a salary to 15 is a shallow attempt to create a just result.
And I really hope this is a joke. Your model provides zero incentive for productivity, which for a society is the main goal, or should be. Giving people good paying jobs and putting caps on wages just for the sake of pandering to the lowest common denominator will run any economic model straight into the ground.
Popular
Back to top



0





