Started By
Message

re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by Buck Magnum
Springdale
Member since Dec 2003
11625 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:02 pm to
He is not wrong!
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15947 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:04 pm to
After just reading through this thread, I'm not surprised it resulted in Bronc posturing himself as the "good guy" while simultaneously displaying his hatred for children and fetishizing Roger's death.
Posted by mrservon
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
438 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:04 pm to
TigerOnTheMountain
HighC
UGATiger26
RogerTheShrubber

I had to go to some meetings so I am just getting caught back up. HOLY shite.

Thank you for exposing the total piece of shite that is Bronc. That bastard is clinically insane.

I thought I was going to invoke some type of death wish response due to my earlier comments on him getting bukkake'd by a roving gang of Teletubbies, but he did not bat an eye at that shite.

Now if you defend children against his tranny-homo story time, that is where he draws the absolute line and he puts a damn jihad out on you and your family.

Nice work, everyone. Nice work indeed.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

stochastic terrorism






You don’t live in reality.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:12 pm to
I’m not going to indulge you Bronc. We both know it’s pointless with you, and frankly you are a piece of garbage and shouldn’t be allowed to post here.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9055 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Bronc


Despite your attempt to label me as "stochastic terrorist," if you go back and read my posts, you'll find that I've actually been giving you the opportunity to argue your case fairly.

quote:

marginalized members of society,


You still have not answered my question. So I'll try another version based on the premise of your most recent post.

Let's assume that I sympathize with these marginalized members of society. That still doesn't explain why children should be exposed or subjected to what - at best - amounts to an unproven, experimental therapy program. Why should they? Who exactly is drag queen storybook hour designed for? The kids or the drag queens?
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
6900 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:15 pm to
There are 2 genders, it’s a fact for every species on the planet.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

I’m not going to indulge you Bronc. We both know it’s pointless with you, and frankly you are a piece of garbage and shouldn’t be allowed to post here.




Still mod begging?

I do love how you continue to say nothing of the person calling a whole class of people subhuman, pedophiles, and groomers, or anyone that dares to claim they aren't, while trying to claim some sort of moral high ground.

Truly, the mental gymnastics should qualify you for the Olympics...The crocodile tears should get you an Oscar.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 3:19 pm
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:18 pm to
seek help dude
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:21 pm to
He really wants people to believe these trannies are providing a public serve to the children of America by reading them a book.

Ignore the content of the book.

And that giant bulge protruding from the front of Bronc’s favorite pink dress.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:22 pm to
quote:


Let's assume that I sympathize with these marginalized members of society. That still doesn't explain why children should be exposed or subjected to what - at best - amounts to an unproven, experimental therapy program. Why should they? Who exactly is drag queen storybook hour designed for? The kids or the drag queens?




There is nothing to answer, you are the one attempting to claim there is some sort of harm brought on by a man with makeup and a dress reading Clifford to a room of kids. You are the one that wants the state to step in and restrict that speech.

The onus is on you to prove that is justifiable and sound reasoning backed by evidence.

Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38814 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:24 pm to
What did he say about gender?
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9055 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

There is nothing to answer, you are the one attempting to claim there is some sort of harm brought on by a man with makeup and a dress reading Clifford to a room of kids. You are the one that wants the state to step in and restrict that speech.

The onus is on you to prove that is justifiable and sound reasoning backed by evidence.





For the purposes of this conversation, I'm in favor of the status quo for no other reason than that it is the status quo.

You want to change the status quo. State your reasoning.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 3:29 pm
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52951 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

you are the one attempting to claim there is some sort of harm brought on by a man with makeup and a dress reading Clifford to a room of kids.


Well, there is harm if the benefit is for the sexual gratification of the tranny. Which is kind of, what this whole fricking ordeal is about.

quote:

You are the one that wants the state to step in and restrict that speech.


Yes, i want the state to step in and protect children from predators. I guess you can call me a big government type if that's your barometer.

quote:

The onus is on you to prove that is justifiable and sound reasoning backed by evidence.



I'm not going to google at work, the incident rate of child victims to groomers and gay adults who were groomed as children, but i will say, that if you talk to normal gays, they find the tranny "movement" to be a sexual fetish and harmful to the gay/lesbian movement.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 3:31 pm
Posted by mrservon
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
438 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

I didn't wish, I said the world would be a better place without him filling it with his vitriol and stochastic terrorism toward trans people and anyone that has the audacity to push back from labeling trans people as subhuman and pedophiles.


Yes you did wish he were dead. Multiple times. But since you love to pretend, I could see how you conveniently forgot that.

quote:

You are apparently the type that finds more fault with someone making such an observation in response to repeated declarations of vitriolic dehumanization toward marginalized members of society, than the expressions of unrelenting hate that provoked the response...Not shocking.

Nor is the call to ban me in defense of the perpetuators of that sort of inciteful rhetoric



Based on the responses & rebuttals you have given in this thread, you are doing nothing but proving our point that no one wants these bullshite beliefs forced upon them. Also, no one, including myself ever called for the illegalization of tranny-homo story book children time. Yet you keep pretending that we were threatening you and your movement. You are only marginalizing yourselves when you get so violently defensive towards people who disagree with your approach. I believe Chris Rock recently called this, "Selective Outrage".

I asked earlier but UGATiger26 asked it better. Now take a deep breath. Apologize to Roger. And answer the fricking question below.

What is the intended outcome of having men in drag read to children in a public library? Is it meant to benefit the children? The individual drag queens? Or the drag movement as a whole?
Posted by rhar61
Member since Nov 2022
5109 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

There is nothing to answer, you are the one attempting to claim there is some sort of harm brought on by a man with makeup and a dress reading Clifford to a room of kids. You are the one that wants the state to step in and restrict that speech.

The onus is on you to prove that is justifiable and sound reasoning backed by evidence.



I guess we should let every freak have a go at young kids and wait to figure it out in 20 years when they are grown.

idiot
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:35 pm to
quote:


Well, there is harm if the benefit is for the sexual gratification of the tranny. Which is kind of, what this whole fricking ordeal is about.

Once again drag =/= Trans

Most people that perform drag are straight or gay men.

Secondly, can you prove this, with, IDK maybe some evidence of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault performed at these readings? Evidence of systemic grooming? Or any grooming?

quote:

Yes, i want the state to step in and protect children from predators


I didn't realize you wanted to ban youth pastor retreats and the church, I guess you are a radical....
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23314 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Damn dude...bringing the truth LOL.


Bronc is stupid and dishonest.

But I get that's what you need to find people on your side.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23314 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Evidence of systemic grooming? Or any grooming?


Every kid there is being groomed.

Done.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:


Every kid there is being groomed.



You seem to misunderstand what the word "evidence" means

Your feelings =/= evidence
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram