- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Faking positive Covid tests to keep numbers up?
Posted on 12/22/20 at 10:31 pm to theantiquetiger
Posted on 12/22/20 at 10:31 pm to theantiquetiger
Makes me want to point out that if a single individual tests positive twice in a 10-day time frame, they count it as 2 confirmed cases. Padding numbers by protocol.
Posted on 12/22/20 at 11:05 pm to theantiquetiger
Makes sense
This post was edited on 9/6/21 at 8:14 am
Posted on 12/23/20 at 12:45 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
I’m thinking either a ton of diagnosis’s are not correct or incomplete
Doubtful. The media just doesn't want to report that over half of the people who contract this virus never even have symptoms. The media won't make money by sharing stories of a virus so awful that most people have no symptoms or cold-like symptoms. They must spread fear so they get their clicks.
What if I told you somewhere between 80-100 million Americans have already had the virus? Because that's the truth.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 2:17 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
I am just wondering about the 50+ people she came in contact with, no one has it (or showing symptoms)
My wife and I both tested positive. We had pretty mild symptoms but definitely had it. I lost my sense of smell for a few days. We were at a Christmas party the night before I started having symptoms and not a single person tested positive. I’m talking 12+ people got tested. It’s weird for sure but that could also mean several people had it already without knowing it and had anti-bodies. It could also mean we had a mild case and were emitting a large viral load. Or a host of other reasons. It doesn’t mean, however, our tests were wrong.
My buddy’s FIL passed today and another buddies father passed this week from COVID, both in their 60s and in good health. The numbers may be inflated some but they’re definitely on the rise, Especially in TN where I live.
This post was edited on 12/23/20 at 2:21 am
Posted on 12/23/20 at 3:44 am to theantiquetiger
Some of the tests will show positive if you have
1/100,000,000,000,000th of a spec of COVID. Some tests are highly sensitive. It will test positive even though you do not have enough of it to get sick.
1/100,000,000,000,000th of a spec of COVID. Some tests are highly sensitive. It will test positive even though you do not have enough of it to get sick.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 6:27 am to gmac8604
quote:
Makes me want to point out that if a single individual tests positive twice in a 10-day time frame, they count it as 2 confirmed cases. Padding numbers by protocol
I don't understand the logic of using "padded case numbers" to argue the government is overreacting. If case numbers are artificially inflated, this thing is deadlier than thought. If only a few thousand people actually caught covid, and 95% of them are all dead - then yeah we better be shutting down.
The best, and IMO most likely, mathematical option is the confirmed cases are a vast undercount (by a factor of 3x to 10x) depending on if we're talking today or last March. That is where the low fatality rate comes from (~0.5% ish, heavily weighted toward the elderly and trending to absolutely miniscule for the young). The undercount will come from people like most of us on the OT, who really aren't going to get tested unless we have to.
The best news ever for ending this quickly would be Gov. Edwards reporting that each and every Louisiana citizen was a confirmed positive.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 6:32 am to Slagathor
quote:
Why did you get a 14 year old tested?
Is she obese or have other medical issues?
If not....it's a fricking virus...let it run it's course
Wow, did you just wake up from a 10 month nap? You get people tested so that you can quarantine those with the virus and do contact tracing to slow the spread.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 7:00 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
1) Young people don’t transmit at the rate adults do
Could this be because kids no longer speak face-to-face, electing to text or use other social media to communicate?
Posted on 12/23/20 at 7:00 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
I’m not a tin hat wearing, conspiracy theory chaser
Um, yes you are. And we've got a board for that!
Posted on 12/23/20 at 7:42 am to TulaneLSU
quote:
TulaneLSU
This guys schtick is getting old.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 7:52 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
It’s a weird virus. I know people who had it and didn’t transmit it to anyone despite plenty of opportunity. And then I know of a single person spreading it to a dozen people in a single setting.
So, either this is the most whackadoodle virus in history, or there may be some issues with the methods and consistency of the tests.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 7:57 am to theantiquetiger
quote:
am just wondering about the 50+ people she came in contact with, no one has it (or showing symptoms)
My fiancé got it. We live together. I did not get it.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 9:44 am to lsunurse
quote:
So you had a pending test and didn’t wait until results were known before having more people over?
That was really stupid
Yep. These are the same retards saying masks are ineffective and pointing to positive cases as proof.
Posted on 12/23/20 at 9:47 am to theantiquetiger
The "numbers" have been inflated to hyper-inflated beyond context from the beginning.
Posted on 12/24/20 at 12:17 am to obdobd918
Fake numbers aside, this is correct. The testing they use is super sensitive so its picking up very small “bits”.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:13 pm to theantiquetiger
Bumping this. I saw only 23 people tested positive for the flu this past week. Pretty sure the CV kills the flu.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:14 pm to gmac8604
I'll also add that it has the same mortality rate as the flu.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:23 pm to theantiquetiger
quote:
Even the doctor that saw her said he didn’t think she had Covid.
How would the doctor have any idea? His opinion is no better than anyone else’s. The only way to tell is with a test.
Posted on 2/1/21 at 8:41 pm to CFDoc
And the $$$ are in the crono.
Why do you think the flu is basically non-existant this year?
Because there is no $$$ to be made with flu cases.
Lots of $$$ to be made with the crono!
Why do you think the flu is basically non-existant this year?
Because there is no $$$ to be made with flu cases.
Lots of $$$ to be made with the crono!
Posted on 2/1/21 at 9:23 pm to theantiquetiger
I posted in another thread that my friend had Covid in Nov, along with his wife. A couple weeks ago he tested four times and was positive, negative, positive, then negative.
PCR test is not as accurate as we would like.
PCR test is not as accurate as we would like.
This post was edited on 2/1/21 at 9:24 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News