- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:11 am to celltech1981
quote:
What they don't tell you is that she backed her plane in to a mailbox and never got off of the ground.
Comment of the day
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:11 am to The Last Coco
quote:
Prior to 9/11, this wasn't the case. So yeah, there weren't armed jets available at the time. And the process of arming a jet with live munitions is a slow tedious process. Waiting to arm them wasn't an option that we could afford at the time.
No disrespect to service members, but how dumb were the officers in charge? The mightiest military in the world and the best option available to the base nearest our nation's capital was, 'Run into them'. frick me.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:27 am to ThatMakesSense
quote:
No disrespect to service members, but how dumb were the officers in charge? The mightiest military in the world and the best option available to the base nearest our nation's capital was, 'Run into them'. frick me.
Plan A. I'm sure they worked on other plans later. But waiting for a better option didn't solve the problem.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:30 am to The Last Coco
quote:
quote:
How convenient that there were no armed jets.
Nowadays, it is standard operating procedure for there to be armed jets that can be in the air at the drop of a hat. 2 f-15s sit "on alert" at all times in Belle Chasse for example with pilots dedicated to them on rorating 24hr shifts.
Prior to 9/11, this wasn't the case. So yeah, there weren't armed jets available at the time. And the process of arming a jet with live munitions is a slow tedious process. Waiting to arm them wasn't an option that we could afford at the time.
We stopped this after SAC was disbanded in the 90s right?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:34 am to Hopeful Doc
My buddy was a medic with the US Park Police at the time and they were having a training day on 9/11. He was in the Huey and they came over the radio and ordered them to fly towards the Capitol building on a vector to intercept Flight 93's path. He said it was strange because all they had on board were two M-16's but no one said anything. Unlikely a big slow Huey could have even gotten into the path of a jetliner much less brought it down.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:37 am to shel311
quote:
Because you didn't know how it ended?
We know what happened with Flight 93 but it would have been helpful to quote the last paragraph of the article that finishes the pilots story.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:38 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
Does the Pentagon have a mark or memorial on or in the building? Piece of wreckage or piece of the building damaged presented as a Memorial.
Coming in hot for a Monday morning
Posted on 9/11/17 at 9:44 am to jbgleason
quote:
My buddy was a medic with the US Park Police at the time and they were having a training day on 9/11. He was in the Huey and they came over the radio and ordered them to fly towards the Capitol building on a vector to intercept Flight 93's path. He said it was strange because all they had on board were two M-16's but no one said anything. Unlikely a big slow Huey could have even gotten into the path of a jetliner much less brought it down.
Roll with what you've got until you come up with something better.
I would actually be very interested to see a timeline of plans to intercept the aircraft, what was at least initially executed, and what plans were disregarded/too extreme/unlikely to be successful. I'd bet those guys in charge had some pretty good imaginations.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:12 am to LSU316
quote:
Yep hard to believe that there are people out there that have not an ounce of puddin pop in their blood and are willing to die for this country.....especially hard to believe when you consider the makeup of people on this board.
Its hard to believe that they would send an aircraft with no ammunition into battle. Sorry but I dont buy that fake story.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:28 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Yeah.....I dont believe that shite.
Know how I know you don't know shite about military aviation?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:29 am to RebelExpress38
bullshite
Pretty sure a few armed fighter jets are always on standby
If not we have huge problems
Pretty sure a few armed fighter jets are always on standby
If not we have huge problems
This post was edited on 9/11/17 at 10:30 am
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:30 am to slackster
Having an unarmed F-16 is as stupid as walking around with an unloaded gun.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:31 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Yeah.....I dont believe that shite.
why not?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:31 am to Ed Osteen
quote:
Coming in hot for a Monday morning
4 downvotes and this comment.
I was honestly asking. No veiled smarmy comment. I've seen the WTC memorial and reflecting pool etc. the bent pieces of the steel. I honestly just wondered if anything was onsite at the pentagon. It's not the most public place so I asked my question.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:32 am to Sparkplug#1
quote:
Having an unarmed F-16 is as stupid as walking around with an unloaded gun.
But an unarmed f-16 being driven by a women can be deadly.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:46 am to Ponchy Tiger
It doesn't make logical sense. It appeals to emotions but makes no logical sense at all.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:48 am to Placebeaux
quote:
It doesn't make logical sense. It appeals to emotions but makes no logical sense at all.
Why not? The plane was headed for the White House or Capital. They had to stop it and had no time to arm planes.
Explain why this doesn't make sense?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:56 am to Placebeaux
quote:
It doesn't make logical sense. It appeals to emotions but makes no logical sense at all.
Do you know how long it takes to arm an F-16 and scramble it?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 10:59 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Its hard to believe that they would send an aircraft with no ammunition into battle. Sorry but I dont buy that fake story.
So do you believe that even today they only have 2 armed and ready to go with less than an hours preparation....because that's what it is.
The plane wasn't armed sitting at the base and it took an hour to get it that way...they didn't have an hour. I'm trying to figure out what is so unbelievable about that story???
Popular
Back to top


1






