Started By
Message

re: Explain the incel “movement” to me like I’m an idiot

Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
40676 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:22 pm to
Leftist beta males are content to identify as gay or bi rather than incel. They are also content to have a nonsexual relationship with a girl while Chad or Tyrone are the ones dicking her down.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38412 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Leftist beta males are content to identify as gay or bi rather than incel. They are also content to have a nonsexual relationship with a girl while Chad or Tyrone are the ones dicking her down.

Not even close
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
15789 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Chad Thundercock



If I don’t impregnate the Mrs by the end of September, we’re adopting a boy so I can name him this
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I can’t argue, but I’m pretty sure you aren’t in position to throw stones.

This is the OT. The OT is stupid.
quote:

If I don’t impregnate the Mrs by the end of September, we’re adopting a boy so I can name him this

He comes complete with his own porn name. Sweet!
This post was edited on 9/1/18 at 3:30 pm
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:40 pm to
They probably go to the internet looking for advice, see others like them, and get roped into the forums that will forever complain about getting girls.

Then, you have guys who don't get girls trying to tell other guys who don't get girls how to get girls based on what they read elsewhere on the internet. Those guys all talk online, and all they do is bad mouth chicks instead of actually spending time trying to meet them. They fall further and further down the hole, and you have the losers that this thread is about.


At one point, a lot of those guys probably could've gotten with a chick, or could've dated someone. Once they went online with the real losers, it all went out of the window. Now, they spend their days being lonely, and blaming other people for themselves being lonely
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74939 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:42 pm to
It's a bunch of morons who don't want to better themselves bitching about how women should sleep with them because they deserve a relationship.

Nobody deserves anything other than a mothers love in this world.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
4824 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Explain the incel “movement” to me like I’m an idiot

Girls have cooties and don't want to play with me.

They simultaneously hate women and think that relationships with women define themselves as a man, and don't recognize the cognitive dissonance.

ETA:
I think it's basically narcissism - they think they are the only important person in the world, and can't comprehend that a particular woman might not agree. Since we all agree he's the most important person in the world, there can be only one reason for her to act that way. It must be because she's an evil bitch.

This post was edited on 9/1/18 at 3:59 pm
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
15789 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

They simultaneously hate women and think that relationships with women define themselves as a man, and don't recognize the cognitive dissonance.



But why?

Mental illness? Raised by a single mother with no masculine role model? Flouride or soy sapping T levels? MMR vaccine causing Autism....
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
102233 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 4:34 pm to
They've always been around. Now they've found each other on the Internet and become a movement.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
24149 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 4:39 pm to
quote:


I was listening to Jordan Peterson on Joe Rogan and “enforced monogamy” came up. Peterson’s point was as a culture we should encourage momogamy because a) it’s good for children and b) there would be less “incels” (I’d heard this term, but didn’t know what it meant).


You misunderstood this greatly. No on enforces monogamy. Its enforced naturally.
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
15789 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

You misunderstood this greatly.



What makes you say this?
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
19566 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

My question is what is causing this? We’re not all beautiful or genetically gifted, but why can’t people find people in their league to have sex with?


Lazy male bitches who instead of doing the work it takes to be attractive to women decided that they magically owe them sex, and have chosen to play the perpetual victim and blame bbc, chad, basic bitches, and Obama.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
19566 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Feminism has given women control of their sexuality.


They should be you sick, selfish frick

quote:

When women have control of their sexuality, they only want the top 20% of men.



False. Even if you did have a way to measure this stat, which you don’t, your numbers would be vastly different. Women are by far less picky about looks when it comes to choosing a mate.

quote:

When women only want to be with the top 20% of men, then harems form


Again, complete fricking nonsense. This has not happened on any meausrable scale in recorded human history.

Moral of story: if you’re a dude who has a job and can take care of himself and has decent hygiene, you can get a woman to have sex with you. That’s a fact. It may not be the woman you want, but that pretty much goes for everybody.

Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
69000 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:10 pm to
I’m voluntarily celibate most days of the month
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:20 pm to
nm
This post was edited on 5/21/20 at 2:33 pm
Posted by Tester1216
South Louisiana
Member since Jul 2018
22149 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

1. Looks (height, body fat percentage, facial symmetry) 2. Status (within their social group and/or community) 3. Wealth (control of resources)


Confidence trumps all of those. Fact.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
74903 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Women are by far less picky about looks when it comes to choosing a mate.
This is absolutely false.

It isn’t the only factor, but to say that they are less picky about looks is asinine.

Others factors can easily over rule that, i.e. social status and money, but if you have neither of those and are unfortunate in the physical department, you are are shite out of luck.

Why do you think this movement arose?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:24 pm to
Sound like you're reading the same crap Rocket31 read and pasted here
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
74903 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Confidence trumps all of those. Fact.

To a degree.

It doesn’t matter how confident an ugly poor person is.

Y’all buy into movie magic tropes more than women do.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38412 posts
Posted on 9/1/18 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

I don't really care if you believe what I'm saying or not. You can keep your head in the sand about it. Lots of people like to deny unconformable truths. It's easier to live that way instead of facing reality.


oh wow
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram