Started By
Message

re: Euro Court of Human Rights: 10 month old baby to be taken off life support

Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

quote:
F
quote:

rick whoever is letting this kid just die



Socialist health-care.



Not to mention Obama's death panels and the Martian sex slaves. We need to lock these people up before they take more of our freedom away!!!
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112648 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Can someone explain to me how a court can tell a parent their child has to die?
I'd guess they have a universal healthcare system, which as crazy as it sounds, it would actually make sense for the government to have a say as opposed to the parents making every last call.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Not to mention Obama's death panels and the Martian sex slaves. We need to lock these people up before they take more of our freedom away!!!



Where can I get some of those sex slaves? Asking for a friend.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Where can I get some of those sex slaves?



Mars, you can't reed or something?
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Mars, you can't reed or something?


I read good. I just assumed they had a shipping service like Amazon does.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112648 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Wait....moving heaven and earth to keep their kid alive is irrational?

The frick?
There are scenarios where the answer to this question is yes IMO.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52513 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:46 pm to
I read about this yesterday. Our son is almost 10 months old and I wanted to puke after reading this
Posted by Polycarp
Texas
Member since Feb 2009
5731 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:48 pm to
My niece was born with a congenital heart defect that required surgery 3 days after being born. Her heart was the size of a strawberry, and had no "plumbing". Surgery took 14 hours, and required a video call with a surgeon out of Japan, who had performed one of these previously. She survived, and is now a healthy 14 year old. They flew her to a convention to show the European Drs that it is possible to repair the defect, because when children were born with this in Europe, they were sent home to die.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18702 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Not to mention Obama's death panels and the Martian sex slaves.



When the right was all up in arms about the Obama death panels I laughed a lot, but this situation pretty much reflects those concerns well.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52513 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

but most people think the government is preventing the parents from paying for treatment.
They are
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Fine, but most people think the government is preventing the parents from paying for treatment. Mostly due to a poorly worded headline.


They were initially denied by the U.K. Government to bring their kid to the USA for experiential treatment that was privately funded.

Given that denial and the ultimate death of the child, they're asking them to bring the baby home for his final moments. Paid for via private funds. And they are being denied, once again.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52513 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Got a link? I'm not disagreeing but it doesn't say that in the article linked in the OP.

LINK

quote:

But the couple, from Bedfont, west London, raised almost £1.4million so they could take their son to America but a series of courts ruled in favour of the British doctors.
Posted by crazycubes
Member since Jan 2016
5256 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Euro Court, who is paying for a 10 month old to be on life support , request said 10 month old baby to be taken off life support


This sucks, but no one is saying the parents can't spend their own money. It's sad we have to place $$$ on human life. I hope Jesus comes back one day and heals everyone. Until then, doctors , medical services providers , drug manufacturers, etc , all want to get paid. Period .

ETA: saw the post above, that's fricked up if they have the money , wow, no freedom.
This post was edited on 6/30/17 at 4:16 pm
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:19 pm to
Haven't read everything, but why are they saying no? If the family has the money and is willing to try it...kid is gonna die anyway. If it doesn't cause debilitating pain, why not try to prolong life?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112648 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

The question at hand is really; who should have the right to make decisions about YOUR life? Or your kid's life? Or your medical treatments? If you think the government has the right to those personal decisions instead of you, then you're giving away something fundamental and essential about true human freedom
If the government is footing the bill, they are going to have a say.

Now, as for reports about the $1mil crowdfunding, if the government is still denying that, that becomes a bit fuzzy and questionable.
Posted by TigerStripes06
SWLA
Member since Sep 2006
30032 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:23 pm to
I get that the government doesn't want to keep spending money on something they view as hopeless, but if the parents want to bring the kid to the US for experimental treatment and pay for it out of their own pockets, how the frick can they be told no? Is the UK communist now?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112648 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

That's not your call. It's not your kid. The kid doesn't belong to you or the government. That would be Bill and his family's decision to make. Medical advancements are happening at breakneck speed. Stuff that is fatal today will be curable in 10 years. If Bill wants to keep his kid alive in hopes of a treatment, more power to him. Keep your nose in your own business.

Aren't there some ethical type issues with physicians weaved into there that make this not quite as black and white as you insinuate?
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11334 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:30 pm to
At two months, the Mother realized that there was something wrong with the way her son was growing. His limbs became limp and he wasn't 'eating'. It took a while for diagnosis because the disease is so rare (and neither his Mother's family nor his Father's family were known carriers, though both apparently were.)

The child got sicker. A loss of eyesight, of hearing of the ability to swallow of the ability to breath without being on a ventilator, and a loss of brain functions.

So many people believe that this disease must have a simple solution, but it doesn't. The similar disease is tied to adverse drug reactions tied to HIV treatment and serious liver damage. That's damage to one organ, not to every cell in the poor child's body.
Posted by Mung
Ba’on Rooj
Member since Aug 2007
9204 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Socialized medicine in action.


well surely the parents could just fly the child on a medical transport plane over here to the US for the experimental treatment? Nothing stopping them from that, right?

Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/30/17 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Nothing stopping them from that, right?


Other than the UK Government? Nope.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram