Started By
Message

re: EPA Set to remove DEF engine derate...

Posted on 8/12/25 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70785 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

DEF does clean up exhaust but at the expense of efficiency, equipment durability, ancillary waste from production, distribution and usage of the product.


DEF is just urea squirted into the exhaust stream over a catalyst. Out of all the BS on a modern diesel intended to control emissions, it's the least pain in the arse thing. Let's talk about EGR, DPF's, 32ksi fuel systems, variable geometry turbochargers, intake throttle valves, exhaust throttle valves.........

Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70785 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

How would a cop know if you can't tell by looking at it.


Wipe your finger inside the tailpipe.

I'm not having the whole deleting is good vs bad discussion on here again. I know the "don't delete your diesel" position is extremely unpopular in the south. Personally, I would never do it without some legislation protecting me.
Posted by White Bear
SPECULATION
Member since Jul 2014
17126 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

DownshiftAndFloorIt
thx

It’s pretty easy to spot, black-sooted pipes on a new truck.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70785 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:08 pm to
It can be hidden pretty well. There are ways to gut the canisters so externally everything appears in place, and the engine can be tuned so that smoke is very minimal and only in hard accelerations.

One thing you can count on is the better enforcement gets, the better people get at hiding stuff.

BUT, universally, there will be black residue inside the pipe of a fully deleted diesel vehicle and a fully in-tact one will not have it.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29389 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

My F150 has been catalytic converter and EGR free since 2005.


As a dude who deletes most things, no cat is just dumb.

No egr, sure.

No double or triple cats, sure.

No cat at all? Doesn't make a single bit of sense in a fuel injected vehicle under 1000 hp.

A single large cat post collector works great and has zero real effect on power/mpg while cleaning up the exhaust.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
5914 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 4:59 pm to
Since we have a lot of diesel drivers, what’s the best diesel truck before DPF and DEF? Powertrain wise.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 5:00 pm
Posted by Scoobs
Member since Jul 2010
253 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:01 pm to
5.9 Cummins.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
5914 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:18 pm to
Which generation?
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37866 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:20 pm to
7.3 Ford. Dodge had a good engine then, but it was, you know, in a Dodge.


6.7 Ford is the best now, and has been since 2012.
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37866 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:23 pm to
I knew a baw that plumbed up a truck to run off-road diesel and you had to really investigate to find it.

He just wanted to do it.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6633 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

If so, that makes the extra expense and trouble more digestible. I like clean air. I like for my kids to breath clean air.

Simpleton low information voter. People like you should stay at home during election season
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16266 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

China and India have no such regulations and can pollute enough to more than offset the improvements the US and Europe have made in the past 30 years.

I agree on the global pollutant level but they also have the shite local air quality to show for it. I’d rather not have to deal with that here. Clean air is a nice thing.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
33565 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

agree on the global pollutant level but they also have the shite local air quality to show for it. I’d rather not have to deal with that here. Clean air is a nice thing.


I’d grant an exception for cammed big block muscle cars something about the exhaust is sexy.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 5:31 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
99798 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:32 pm to
I currently have a Farmall 120A with a burned up DEF pump

Hauling it to get deleted next week. frick all of that shite


I can understand having it on a semi truck. But for tractors it’s bullshite, there’s not enough tractors running every day to make any significant environmental issues. We need raw, reliable horsepower


I want Farmall to go back to engines like this

LINK
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16266 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

I’d grant an exception for cammed big block muscle cars something about the exhaust is sexy.

All day.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
18746 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

A single large cat post collector works great and has zero real effect on power/mpg while cleaning up the exhaust.



Well stock this truck had two light-off catalytic converters and two primaries. I put longtube off-road headers on after the supercharger, no reason to put them back of when the tune eliminated the need for them. Just dead weight and a potential failure point.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16266 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:40 pm to
My personal favorite one is back when I was working offshore we started mothbaling all our old 71 series Detroit fluid pumps and power packs because all the operators wanted emissions compliant units. So we started by tier 3 or 4 units. Then after the BP coast guard report came out they all wanted class1div2 units and no one made them. So we pulled all the old mechanical and air starter unit out and recommissioned them.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 5:42 pm
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
3421 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 5:47 pm to
Diesel not burned is diesel not polluting, scrap all the DEF/DPF bs!
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
9815 posts
Posted on 8/12/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

The same group that pushed for DEF didn’t account for how much cardboard and plastic is now in landfills.


Do they ever?



Climate change never helped the environment.
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
15060 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 1:44 am to
quote:

Nah. It's not a bad thing at all. It's a lot simpler than EGR and much more effective. If you want to knock NOx out of the exhaust stream, aftertreatment is the way to do it.

Show me the overall environmental benefit of producing all of the components involved in the production and transportation of def along with all of the damaged components resulting from def versus just not having it completely and ill shut up forever about it. Actual scientific data, not made up Reddit b.s.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram