- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you think NASA could put another man on the moon in a 7 year timeframe?
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:38 pm to JPinLondon
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:38 pm to JPinLondon
quote:
The Lunar landings did happen, and have been independently verified by other nations with no reason to give the US credit for "faking them".
There was also verification by individuals, one was a friend of my Dad's who intercepted the communications from the moon of Apollo 12 with homemade antenna and receiving equipment, he did not tell anyone other than a few friends and had no connection to NASA, there were several others doing the same thing.
0
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:39 pm to NYNolaguy1
With the successful Falcon 5 Heavy launch, I think we could do it in a year.
It’s all a question of the stakes. How badly you want it.
ETA: well this is a WTF bump
It’s all a question of the stakes. How badly you want it.
ETA: well this is a WTF bump
This post was edited on 3/14/18 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Personally I doubt NASA could do it again within the same timeframe.
What? It'd be child's play in today's world.
They did it in the 60s with basically TI83s for computers.
This post was edited on 3/14/18 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:41 pm to NYNolaguy1
Wakanda could be there next week.
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:49 pm to TH03
quote:
They did it in the 60s with basically TI83s for computers.
shite.
A TI-83 would kick the arse of the puttering 2Mhz Apollo computer
This post was edited on 3/14/18 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 3/14/18 at 6:51 pm to TH03
quote:and with all of those black women
They did it in the 60s with basically TI83s for computers.
Posted on 3/14/18 at 7:37 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Do you think NASA could put another man on the moon in a 7 year timeframe?
Posted on 3/14/18 at 7:55 pm to OMLandshark
No expert believes moving flesh is reasonable. Only regards like you think it is a good idea.
Posted on 3/14/18 at 9:08 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The public would get more excited about space travel if we stopped spending their money on remote control toys to drive around mars and take boring pictures.
The purpose of NASA isn’t entertainment.
Posted on 3/14/18 at 9:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
This is a horse that’s been beaten to death on here many times before, and hell if you’d like to have another go at it I’m game. But until we find an affordable way off this planet manned spaceflight makes zero sense. Everything that can be done on a manned mission can be done on an unmanned mission and a tiny fraction of the cost. Which means we can do a hell of a lot more of them.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 12:17 am to AUCE05
quote:
No expert believes moving flesh is reasonable. Only regards like you think it is a good idea.
Good regards I’m guessing.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 12:31 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Do you think NASA could put another man on the moon in a 7 year timeframe?
No...
NASA specifically couldn't...
Posted on 3/15/18 at 1:31 am to CapstoneGrad06
I'm more of a fan of massive space stations that can migrate thru space for generations. We could be the aliens on Independence Day, ya know?
Posted on 3/15/18 at 3:41 am to NYNolaguy1
We do not have the national will to do it so no NASA can't and we probably shouldn't anyway. That would be like someone maxxed out on credit cards buying a boat.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 6:16 am to NYNolaguy1
They just need to focus on not fricking up SLS
The young guard of engineers at NASA haven’t efficiently been passed down information from the old guard in the circles I interact with, and they have some major hurdles to overcome that should have already been overcome before SLS will ever fly.
It’s probably heresy to say this as NASA is one of our customers, but I think private space flight is the real future. NASA just isn’t what they were in the 60s and 70s. They get bogged down much more in analysis paralysis when it comes to doing anything.
The young guard of engineers at NASA haven’t efficiently been passed down information from the old guard in the circles I interact with, and they have some major hurdles to overcome that should have already been overcome before SLS will ever fly.
It’s probably heresy to say this as NASA is one of our customers, but I think private space flight is the real future. NASA just isn’t what they were in the 60s and 70s. They get bogged down much more in analysis paralysis when it comes to doing anything.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 6:55 am to Ross
This whole thread was a hell of a bump, but you pretty summed up my concerns .
.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:06 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Our galaxy will collide with another in a million years or so
That's a negative, it's far longer than that.
quote:
making the area of space the sun is in uninhabitable in the process.
Also not true. Stars are so far apart they'll hardly notice.
LINK
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:13 am to NYNolaguy1
For what purpose? It’s been done several times, Baw.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 7:21 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Our galaxy will collide with another in a million years or so, making the area of space the sun is in uninhabitable in the proces
Nope.
Our galaxy will collide with another.
But the likelihood of there being any affects is shockingly low. Space is BIG.
Posted on 3/15/18 at 8:16 am to NYNolaguy1
Never went in first place big hoax
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News