Started By
Message

re: Do You Think Felons Should Be Able To Legally Have Firearms?

Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:03 pm to
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Do You Think Felons Should Be Able To Legally Have Firearms?

Sure, why not? The felons that abide the law don’t cause any problems.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Sure, why not? The felons that abide the law don’t cause any problems.

until they do,


let face it , we're all potential felons in the eyes of the leftist Govt and their patsies on the internet
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:12 pm to
ahh,, so you're saying the pork lobby is behind all of it ?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122527 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:17 pm to
You saying its not?????
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:18 pm to
That’s what you said.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:37 pm to
Never trust pigs, they'll take your guns


I get it NOW
it makes perfect sense
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
75945 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:38 pm to
What if a pissed off / jaded crazy bitch of an ex wife decides to petition for their ex husband to be considered a danger to society. The government busts down his door and takes all his guns?


Seems like a really really slippery slope
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:42 pm to
piece of shite
Posted by BayouCatFan
Member since Jul 2008
4580 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

OWLFAN86



Speaking of someone who should have their guns removed for acting irrational. Just his responses in this thread show he has major anger issues and shouldn't be anywhere near firearms. Get some help, weirdo!!!!
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

So talking about politics causes anxiety? She sounds like a narcissist. As if HER politics is that important she isn't able to "deal" with others views.
Oweo..I'd buy you beer.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Sure, why not? The felons that abide the law don’t cause any problems.


Yep, they've paid their debt to society. Should be a free person again.
Posted by Lsutiger2424
Member since Dec 2016
1001 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 9:59 pm to
It would be a judge who would decide wether to issue the order to seize the guns or not, not the cops.
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19122 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

It would be a judge who would decide wether to issue the order to seize the guns or not, not the cops.



Yes, but the burden of proof us practically zero. Hearsay is enough, and that’s bullshite.
Posted by Lsutiger2424
Member since Dec 2016
1001 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 10:05 pm to
Not saying I agree with implementing this nonsense. Just stating that the police can’t just go take anyone’s guns because they think that person shouldn’t have a gun or might be crazy.

Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Just his responses in this thread show he has major anger issues and shouldn't be anywhere near firearms
which one? or ONES?


come on dont be a pussy

pew pew pew
This post was edited on 11/17/19 at 10:16 pm
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 10:37 pm to
Orwell was a fricking fortune teller.

I wonder what his thoughts were on the 2020 Superbowl.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198020 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Orwell was a fricking fortune teller.

on global politics and society

quote:

I wonder what his thoughts were on the 2020 Superbowl.

we have Peej
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 11/17/19 at 11:14 pm to
Hey, I emailed you an offensive joke.
Posted by johnqpublic
Right here
Member since Oct 2017
897 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:52 am to
This should come down to Due Process (14A).

2A guarantees the right to bear arms. In order to remove someone's rights guaranteed to them is via due process. Something must be legally adjudicated somewhere before one's rights can be restricted. A felon has had this due process. Someone calling the cops and merely saying someone is a danger is not. I am not an expert on this particular law in CO, but I can see it working, if, and only if, there is clear probable cause and there is a speedy process for the person whose rights have been restricted can have this adjudicated quickly (there is a similar process for 5150 in CA and so-called Green Warrants in other areas). Otherwise, I see a Constitutional fight over this. If they can remove someone's 2A rights merely over something a third party says, why not apply this to 1A or 4A? No need for a search warrant anymore.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram