Started By
Message

re: DeSantis Admin Wants to Put Golf Courses, Pickleball Courts and More In FL State Parks

Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:15 pm to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21128 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

It’s not really a topographical wonderland.

Do you even Lake Wales ridge? It's a great topographic feature that dictates a lot of cool shite in the state.
Posted by BayouENGR
Seagrove Beach
Member since Nov 2015
2918 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:25 pm to
Walton Outdoors

quote:

Are there other links out there to say what other parks, particularly on the panhandle, have plans for hotels and golf courses?

No golf courses here, just hotel, pickeball & disc golf.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
22768 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:30 pm to
Topsail Park is a gorgeous stretch of untouched beach. Would absolutely suck to throw some lodge on there.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
139421 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:31 pm to
Florida state parks don't have golf courses already?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75368 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

No golf courses here, just hotel, pickeball & disc golf.


Link headline says there was a public input meeting. That directly contradicts the other poster who said Desantis didn't take any public input in this operation.

Thanks for the link by the way.


ETA- Topsail state park is 1500 acres. A 350 room hotel on 98 at the entrance won't destroy the park. I don't know about all the pickleball and disc golf stuff. Disc golf courses in my experience are very nature-friendly. Pickle ball, from what I understand, requires pavement. Not a fan of that, but if it's 5 or 6 courts, that's still less than an acre.
This post was edited on 8/22/24 at 6:53 pm
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
71096 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:51 pm to
Saw the report on the news this moring.


Honestly, I am indifferent. I just dont GAS about it. Its a small area and will get more use but I understand people mad about it


Im just not on either side

Posted by BayouENGR
Seagrove Beach
Member since Nov 2015
2918 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:51 pm to
The meeting isn’t until August 27, so no input has been given here yet. Folks are sharpening their pitchforks though
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
23211 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

"It's not about golf," Jessica Namath told WPTV reporter Meghan McRoberts. "To me, it's about destroying an ancient sand dune and destroying the scrub jay habitat."

This is a hilarious statement when you get past the pompous environmentalist mindset
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75368 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

This is a hilarious statement when you get past the pompous environmentalist mindset


Scrubjay range, per wikipedia-




300 acres of golf courses aren't exactly going to wipe them out.
Posted by Cleathecat
Houston
Member since Feb 2021
1763 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 7:09 pm to
More affordable golf is always a good thing.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
22768 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Topsail state park is 1500 acres. A 350 room hotel on 98 at the entrance won't destroy the park.


Go walk on that beach at the park and tell me 350+ people lounging around wouldn’t spoil it.
This post was edited on 8/22/24 at 7:20 pm
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11788 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 7:20 pm to
It’s funded by the taxpayer, they should enjoy it. I live in Florida. Stop putting this on DeSantis, no one gives two shits about this
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
75368 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 7:31 pm to
Topsail- It's 3 miles of shoreline. 350 people mostly concentrated around what would presumably exist as a boardwalk wouldn't ruin the beach. It might "ruin" a couple hundred yards of it.
Posted by Shanks A Lot
Member since Dec 2023
1765 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

deeprig9


Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
11747 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Golf courses are ok on any other land, just so long as it's not inside of a state park. Am I understanding your position correctly?


No. You arent We don't live in a vacuum, so this isn't that black and white. I wouldn't want a golf course on the rim of the Grand Canyon or Arlington cemetery either. And while a golf course in Yellowstone would be a travesty. the golf course in Gulf Shores State Park, not so much (unless you want to argue the idea of a public vs private enterprise)

Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
2868 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:40 pm to
As a Florida native and current panhandle resident,

I think that enough of Florida is being developed if not over-developed that the State Parks do not need this kind of development.

Low impact work might make sense like the frisbee golf - but on the few courses I have seen, I have not seen any players. I don't know what the demand is. Expanding other activities such as paddling makes sense but golf courses do not.

The appearance of this being discussed and planned out of public view with a limited public comment opportunity is a really bad look as well.

i doubt that people are concerned about 350 rooms impacting the profitiability of their VRBOs. The SoWal is building, 350 rooms isn't much.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75137 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

300 acres of golf courses aren't exactly going to wipe them out.

What does development and habitat loss look like in the rest of that range cumulatively speaking?

The impact of habitat loss and degradation isn't exactly immediate, it is a slow creep.
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
5551 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:49 pm to
I don't do golf or pickel. I'd rather see the money go toward buying more public land. And people don't realize that when those things are built they immediately start requiring maintenance/upkeep.

Some people think "just build something and then you're done". No, once the build is done then the perpetual upkeep costs start. And those costs usually aren't funded well. People like new things, not spending money to repair old things.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66097 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:56 pm to
People just don't like it around them
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
56861 posts
Posted on 8/22/24 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

I think that enough of Florida is being developed if not over-developed that the State Parks do not need this kind of development.


Exactly. It isn't like there is some kind of public need, or even a public want for this stuff being built in state parks. The reaction from the citizens of Florida has been overwhelmingly negative since these plans were revealed. They could have saved a lot of time, effort, and money by simply asking the public first if there was even any interest, and then realizing that no one likes these plans before they even put them together. It comes across as run-of-the-mill sketchy government shenanigans that will probably only serve to line certain people's pockets.
This post was edited on 8/22/24 at 9:21 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram