- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:31 pm to Beef Tips
So how much time do you think they will get? I doubt that Kaivon will beat all 3 charges. And I got a feeling that Desmond isn't going to just be home free.
Posted on 5/19/23 at 8:51 pm to clip11
quote:
So how much time do you think they will get?
In the place where it matters, eternity.
Posted on 6/19/23 at 2:33 pm to DVA Tailgater
I looked for an update and this was the only thing I could find. Some law failed to pass..
Anyone heard anything regarding the suspects?
Law fails to pass
Anyone heard anything regarding the suspects?
quote:
Legislation in response to the death of 19-year-old LSU student Madison Brooks fails to get out of the House Judiciary Committee. The Senate-approved bill would hold bars liable if an underage person consumes alcohol at their establishment and then injures themselves or others. Shreveport Representative Alan Seabaugh voted against the measure because it protects a person who breaks the law.
“The minor who knew they did something wrong, has a drink, leaves, either injures themself or injures somebody else and they are not responsible, but the bar owner is, who didn’t know he was doing nothing wrong, I have a real problem with that,” said Seabaugh.
Law fails to pass
Posted on 6/19/23 at 5:45 pm to JDPndahizzy
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/19/23 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:07 pm to warlock1974
WRBZ article just released.
Claims the BAC was 12% lower than expected and that the dna of the 4 arrested was not found inside her. Dna of one of them was found on outside of her genital area.
Claims the BAC was 12% lower than expected and that the dna of the 4 arrested was not found inside her. Dna of one of them was found on outside of her genital area.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 7:13 pm to crewdepoo
12% lower is still high. It’s just less likely to be life threatening making their actions of not getting her home even dumber especially for those not having last name of Washington.
The rape being wrong doesn’t change, and Washington’s dna still found in genital area along with injuries on her back side suspicious of assault but that “the separate lab report said there was insufficient male DNA present and no indication of when an assault might have occurred.”
Did defense leak this?
The rape being wrong doesn’t change, and Washington’s dna still found in genital area along with injuries on her back side suspicious of assault but that “the separate lab report said there was insufficient male DNA present and no indication of when an assault might have occurred.”
quote:
The East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office, which sought the charges against the four men, said in the days after Brooks' death that the woman had a blood alcohol level of .319 percent, or four times the legal limit to drive a car, at the time she died. The coroner's office final toxicology results fixed the BAC at .282 percent, still well above the legal limit to drive and extremely intoxicated.
The National Institutes of Health says BACs above .31 percent can be life-threatening; those from .16 to .3 indicate severe impairment.
Did defense leak this?
quote:
Moore sent the following statement Wednesday afternoon:
Although I do not know your source of information, the facts are that my office provided many items of discovery as obligated by law, in this case yesterday to three law offices representing these defendants. These documents were not placed in the public record but only given to these offices. We will continue to abide by our discovery obligations and file these matters with the court. The discovery that was provided as “read only”. It is obvious from the audit trail who received and viewed what evidence and how many times such was viewed. The source will be obvious. We have never provided any discovery to the media and we will continue to not try this case in the media but in the court in the best interest of all parties involved.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:06 pm to dallastigers
Nakomoto is scum for writing up that article with that title.
So it’s some big revelation and now she can obviously consent since it was “only” a BAC of .28?
I wonder why he emphasized “vaginal” and didn’t mention anal? Hmmmm
So it’s some big revelation and now she can obviously consent since it was “only” a BAC of .28?
I wonder why he emphasized “vaginal” and didn’t mention anal? Hmmmm
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:24 pm to tigerskin
So if we are to believe that EBRSO blood alcohol test is off that much, shouldn’t that call into question the validity of the other BAC tests they have performed?
Sounds like a bunch of BS to me.
Sounds like a bunch of BS to me.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:24 pm to crewdepoo
quote:
dna of the 4 arrested was not found inside her
Who cares the 2 guys admitted to having sex with her?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:27 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Nakomoto is scum for writing up that article with that title.
Its not the only reason he is scum.. But I get your point.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:39 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Nakomoto is scum for writing up that article with that title.
He’s definitely a POS
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:45 pm to tigerskin
quote:
The coroner's office final toxicology results fixed the BAC at .282 percent, still well above the legal limit to drive and extremely intoxicated.
Will have to see the evidence as it’s presented, but seems reasonable that the blood taken at hospital will have a higher BAC than the coroner’s autopsy BAC. I imagine that measures BAC at time of death which was several hours after arrival at the hospital.
This probably isn’t the gotcha the defense is trying to make it out to be.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 8:53 pm to tigerskin
quote:
wonder why he emphasized “vaginal” and didn’t mention anal
According to the DNA results from the Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory, material gathered from 13 swabs and two washings resulted in insufficient male DNA samples from the vaginal, cervical, anal and perineal areas
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:00 pm to GRIZZ
quote:
According to the DNA results from the Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory, material gathered from 13 swabs and two washings resulted in insufficient male DNA samples from the vaginal, cervical, anal and perineal areas
Well then…. I guess it is too bad that Washington already admitted it
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:11 pm to dallastigers
quote:
The National Institutes of Health says BACs above .31 percent can be life-threatening; those from .16 to .3 indicate severe impairment.
Yeah so over that amount can be .6
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:57 pm to tigerskin
quote:quote:
According to the DNA results from the Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory, material gathered from 13 swabs and two washings resulted in insufficient male DNA samples from the vaginal, cervical, anal and perineal areas
Well then…. I guess it is too bad that Washington already admitted it
The quote left off a big part about Washington. The rest of samples were insufficient (wearing condoms or pulling out).
quote:
According to the DNA results from the Louisiana State Police Crime Laboratory, material gathered from 13 swabs and two washings resulted in insufficient male DNA samples from the vaginal, cervical, anal and perineal areas. A swab of external genitalia revealed DNA that could have come from Washington, but none of the others.
Lab report still mentions signs of assault to her backside noted in autopsy, but just includes insufficient male DNA present and no indication on when assault might have occurred. The forensic pathologist who did autopsy may have different theory on when assault occurred.
I forgot about her organs being donated and kept on life support for awhile.
quote:
A rape kit was completed after the woman died, and that occurred after her organs were harvested for possible transplant.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:20 pm to dallastigers
quote:
A rape kit was completed after the woman died, and that occurred after her organs were harvested for possible transplant
I’ve been involved in several organ harvesting cases. I can assure you, the rape kit was performed in the ED before she was taking to surgery.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:42 pm to GRIZZ
quote:
I’ve been involved in several organ harvesting cases. I can assure you, the rape kit was performed in the ED before she was taking to surgery.
The article says it was performed after her death and after her organs were harvested.
This makes sense given here, at the time she was brought to the hospital and into surgery, all anyone knew was that she was drunk and hit by a car. It wasn’t until later (probably well after attempting surgery) they figured out she was with dudes, raped, and left for dead.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:59 pm to crewdepoo
Question: how does a BAC get changed?
Are we talking a decimal error? Wrong process used? Timing - different tests ran at different times? Or some judgment call?
Are we talking a decimal error? Wrong process used? Timing - different tests ran at different times? Or some judgment call?
Page 417 of 419
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News