- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
And I’ve said that multiple times. And I also said my question had way more to do with simply being curious how the biology of it all works. But WeeWaawa wanted to act all big with his CPR training instead of just saying he doesn’t really know either.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:19 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
The suspect raped a 12 year old for a hour and you want to argue about the accuracy of blood tests?
Last post, ya fricking morons.
You can get pissed at that and draw conclusions. A jury will not hear it.
So y’all keep beating your little peckers (I’m specifically talking to you, Shrubber) to an accusation (not a fact) that is meaningless in the real fricking world as far as Madison is concerned.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:21 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
You have really embarrassed yourself here tonight and it’s only going to look worse in retrospect once all the evidence of Washington’s atrocities come to light.
Voted up.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:21 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
your little peckers
dont lump us all together.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:22 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
. A jury will not hear it.
Dozenth time, this isn't a jury.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:24 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
That’s all I ever do.
Does this mean you got your Junior Investigator badge? Congrats.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:25 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Dozenth time, this isn't a jury.
Then your comments are worth frick all.
I live in the real world.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:27 pm to WaWaWeeWa
I agree (I work in healthcare, too). In this situation, I am certain she had an IV and was probably intubated in route. This means she likely had fluids prior to arriving to the ER, which dilutes the sample. This would make the 0.312 BAC actually LESS than what it was before.
No one denied IV access or lab draws. Her family wouldn't have had time to deny it because it is done so fast when a trauma first arrives. They will have an EXACT timestamp in her chart that tells the time the blood was drawn. It is part of triaging the patient.
If anything, I feel like there is more evidence to suggest her BAC may have been HIGHER than what they drew than evidence supporting that her BAC was miscalculated and was lower than reported at the time of draw.
No one denied IV access or lab draws. Her family wouldn't have had time to deny it because it is done so fast when a trauma first arrives. They will have an EXACT timestamp in her chart that tells the time the blood was drawn. It is part of triaging the patient.
If anything, I feel like there is more evidence to suggest her BAC may have been HIGHER than what they drew than evidence supporting that her BAC was miscalculated and was lower than reported at the time of draw.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:29 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Last post
quote:
Then your comments are worth frick all.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:30 pm to hmmmokay
quote:False
This means she likely had fluids prior to arriving to the ER, which dilutes the sample.
quote:
At intervals on both occasions, blood ethanol levels were estimated using a breath analyzer. Using linear regression analysis, no difference was found in rates of alcohol clearance with or without i.v. fluid intervention. The common rate of clearance between both groups was 15 mg/dL/h (95% CI 12 to 18). We conclude that i.v. fluid therapy does not accelerate ethanol clearance in intoxicated patients.
This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:31 pm to ell_13
quote:
And I’ve said that multiple times. And I also said my question had way more to do with simply being curious how the biology of it all works. But WeeWaawa wanted to act all big with his CPR training instead of just saying he doesn’t really know either.
Let me give you a less scientific analysis.
It’s indisputable that she couldn’t communicate where she lived with multiple attempts AFTER she had sex.
Do you think someone who doesn’t even know where they live is coherent enough to consent to anal sex with 2 guys in the back of a car?
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:31 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Based on the defense lawyers of Laundrie, Kohberger, and these guys, I'm convinced I should be admitted to the bar or these guys have been purposely trying to tank their clients
I hope you weren't referring to me with my few anecdotes

I hope you weren't referring to me with my few anecdotes
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
No it’s not a jury on the board but people are saying Washingtons other arrests won’t come to light at trial. What judge is saying is that it would not be admissible.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:33 pm to hmmmokay
quote:
If anything, I feel like there is more evidence to suggest her BAC may have been HIGHER than what they drew than evidence supporting that her BAC was miscalculated and was lower than reported at the time of draw.
Which would lead a reasonable person to understand how she could walk into a car on burbank. The "muh BAC" crowd keeps glossing over that fact.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:Why are you asking me this? It has nothing to do with the validity of the BAC reading which was our discussion and one I was having just because I was curious what could affect it. I’ve already said they are guilty based on their statements alone. Carver really did them all in. The video… the BAC… not all that important when you have these guys saying how drunk she was.
It’s indisputable that she couldn’t communicate where she lived with multiple attempts AFTER she had sex. Do you think someone who doesn’t even know where they live is coherent enough to consent to anal sex with 2 guys in the back of a car?
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Last post, ya fricking morons. You can get pissed at that and draw conclusions. A jury will not hear it. So y’all keep beating your little peckers (I’m specifically talking to you, Shrubber) to an accusation (not a fact) that is meaningless in the real fricking world as far as Madison is concerned
No one gives a frick judge.
I’m not making a legal argument.
I’m asking why anyone who knows he raped a 12 year old would say anything that could be construed as being supportive of him.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to ell_13
I didn’t the whole thing but that refers to breathalyzer .. if I were stopped by a cop and breathalyzer and had a bac drawn at the same time would they be the same?
Can fluids affect a blood draw but not affect a blow into a breathalyzer??
Can fluids affect a blood draw but not affect a blow into a breathalyzer??
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:38 pm to tiger91
Only if the blood draw is near where they have the IV connected based on what I’ve read.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:39 pm to ell_13
quote:
From the swab was my Lawyer friends thought.
I keep seeing people saying "swab." They did not "swab" test anything for a BAC. They drew blood, sent it in a tube to the lab along with other blood from the same sample to run every lab they needed at once. Are we now going to argue that every lab result was wrong from her hospital admission?
This is just not a good defense and if it is the best that his attorney can come up with then that says a LOT.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:40 pm to ZootedRasta
I hope your interpretation is correct. I wanna see these frickers' lives ruined like they deserve
Popular
Back to top


1



