Started By
Message

re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case

Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:18 pm to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88152 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:18 pm to
And I’ve said that multiple times. And I also said my question had way more to do with simply being curious how the biology of it all works. But WeeWaawa wanted to act all big with his CPR training instead of just saying he doesn’t really know either.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

The suspect raped a 12 year old for a hour and you want to argue about the accuracy of blood tests?


Last post, ya fricking morons.

You can get pissed at that and draw conclusions. A jury will not hear it.

So y’all keep beating your little peckers (I’m specifically talking to you, Shrubber) to an accusation (not a fact) that is meaningless in the real fricking world as far as Madison is concerned.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
35315 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

You have really embarrassed yourself here tonight and it’s only going to look worse in retrospect once all the evidence of Washington’s atrocities come to light.



Voted up.
Posted by Beef Tips
Member since Jan 2013
2894 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

your little peckers


dont lump us all together.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

. A jury will not hear it.


Dozenth time, this isn't a jury.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

That’s all I ever do.


Does this mean you got your Junior Investigator badge? Congrats.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Dozenth time, this isn't a jury.


Then your comments are worth frick all.

I live in the real world.
Posted by hmmmokay
Member since Jan 2018
16 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:27 pm to
I agree (I work in healthcare, too). In this situation, I am certain she had an IV and was probably intubated in route. This means she likely had fluids prior to arriving to the ER, which dilutes the sample. This would make the 0.312 BAC actually LESS than what it was before.

No one denied IV access or lab draws. Her family wouldn't have had time to deny it because it is done so fast when a trauma first arrives. They will have an EXACT timestamp in her chart that tells the time the blood was drawn. It is part of triaging the patient.

If anything, I feel like there is more evidence to suggest her BAC may have been HIGHER than what they drew than evidence supporting that her BAC was miscalculated and was lower than reported at the time of draw.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89201 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Last post
quote:

Then your comments are worth frick all.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88152 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

This means she likely had fluids prior to arriving to the ER, which dilutes the sample.
False

quote:

At intervals on both occasions, blood ethanol levels were estimated using a breath analyzer. Using linear regression analysis, no difference was found in rates of alcohol clearance with or without i.v. fluid intervention. The common rate of clearance between both groups was 15 mg/dL/h (95% CI 12 to 18). We conclude that i.v. fluid therapy does not accelerate ethanol clearance in intoxicated patients.
This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 8:32 pm
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

And I’ve said that multiple times. And I also said my question had way more to do with simply being curious how the biology of it all works. But WeeWaawa wanted to act all big with his CPR training instead of just saying he doesn’t really know either.


Let me give you a less scientific analysis.

It’s indisputable that she couldn’t communicate where she lived with multiple attempts AFTER she had sex.

Do you think someone who doesn’t even know where they live is coherent enough to consent to anal sex with 2 guys in the back of a car?
Posted by mjthe
Virginia
Member since Oct 2020
6870 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:31 pm to
Based on the defense lawyers of Laundrie, Kohberger, and these guys, I'm convinced I should be admitted to the bar or these guys have been purposely trying to tank their clients

I hope you weren't referring to me with my few anecdotes
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40244 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:32 pm to
No it’s not a jury on the board but people are saying Washingtons other arrests won’t come to light at trial. What judge is saying is that it would not be admissible.



Posted by Beef Tips
Member since Jan 2013
2894 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

If anything, I feel like there is more evidence to suggest her BAC may have been HIGHER than what they drew than evidence supporting that her BAC was miscalculated and was lower than reported at the time of draw.


Which would lead a reasonable person to understand how she could walk into a car on burbank. The "muh BAC" crowd keeps glossing over that fact.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88152 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

It’s indisputable that she couldn’t communicate where she lived with multiple attempts AFTER she had sex. Do you think someone who doesn’t even know where they live is coherent enough to consent to anal sex with 2 guys in the back of a car?
Why are you asking me this? It has nothing to do with the validity of the BAC reading which was our discussion and one I was having just because I was curious what could affect it. I’ve already said they are guilty based on their statements alone. Carver really did them all in. The video… the BAC… not all that important when you have these guys saying how drunk she was.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Last post, ya fricking morons. You can get pissed at that and draw conclusions. A jury will not hear it. So y’all keep beating your little peckers (I’m specifically talking to you, Shrubber) to an accusation (not a fact) that is meaningless in the real fricking world as far as Madison is concerned


No one gives a frick judge.

I’m not making a legal argument.

I’m asking why anyone who knows he raped a 12 year old would say anything that could be construed as being supportive of him.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40244 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:34 pm to
I didn’t the whole thing but that refers to breathalyzer .. if I were stopped by a cop and breathalyzer and had a bac drawn at the same time would they be the same?

Can fluids affect a blood draw but not affect a blow into a breathalyzer??
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88152 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:38 pm to
Only if the blood draw is near where they have the IV connected based on what I’ve read.
Posted by hmmmokay
Member since Jan 2018
16 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

From the swab was my Lawyer friends thought.


I keep seeing people saying "swab." They did not "swab" test anything for a BAC. They drew blood, sent it in a tube to the lab along with other blood from the same sample to run every lab they needed at once. Are we now going to argue that every lab result was wrong from her hospital admission?
This is just not a good defense and if it is the best that his attorney can come up with then that says a LOT.
Posted by Thundercracker
Westsylvania
Member since Nov 2022
276 posts
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:40 pm to
I hope your interpretation is correct. I wanna see these frickers' lives ruined like they deserve
Jump to page
Page First 257 258 259 260 261 ... 419
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 259 of 419Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram