- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:44 pm to Proximo
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:44 pm to Proximo
Madi was so not drunk that she got ran over by a car in the middle of the night in middle of road. Such sober behavior. She was walking so obviously not drunk at all.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:44 pm to inspectweld
Are you vaxxed and boosted also?
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:46 pm to WaWaWeeWa
You also said an IV would dilute a BAC reading but that’s not true either. 
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:49 pm to inspectweld
quote:
Here`s one and there easy to find
That says nothing about the accuracy of BAC tests.
It says “Generalized Dose Specific Effects”
Which means these are the effects commonly seen at this level of BAC. Now where does it say it’s a universal. It’s totally dependent on the person and many other factors.
For instance, caffeine and stimulants like Ritalin significantly blunt the effects of alcohol. Was she drinking a bunch of red bulls or a regular user of prescription Ritalin? Something as simple as that could explain her functioning.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:50 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Last one:
quote:
The loss of blood with respect to the results of evidentiary blood testing are impacted upon many ways, these include:
Trauma decreases gastric emptying which prolongs the pre-absorption state.
Blood loss whether internal or external, into a sequester area, of the body or otherwise will reduce the total blood volume. Therefore any alcohol still present in the stomach, a pre-absorptive state would be absorbed into a smaller volume of blood leading to a higher BAC on laboratory analysis.
Blood loss will be replaced by interstitial fluids. These interstitial fluids have a higher water content than blood, and therefore would contain a higher concentration of alcohol than whole blood, so laboratory results would reveal an erroneously elevated BAL.
Trauma would activate the coagulation scheme to limit blood loss. Activation of the coagulation scheme depletes the blood of clotting factors and related proteins. This decrease in clotting factors and related proteins results in a higher water concentration in the remaining blood. This higher water concentration leads to an erroneously elevated whole blood alcohol level result on a laboratory analysis.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:51 pm to inspectweld
quote:
inspectweld
LINK
.36 BAC, 11 minute mark. He walks fine, just not fine enough to pass the test.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 7:51 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Chad504boy
I know that was expressed in sarcasm but you're making a very valid point.
Her sense of judgment was non-functional.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:01 pm to ell_13
quote:
ell_13
Let me again quote your link
“The conclusions from this literature survey are that neither trauma, massive blood loss nor replacement fluids have any significant effect on a preexisting BAC or the rate of ethanol elimination from blood. This stems, at least in part, from the physicochemical properties of ethanol, which is a drug that easily passes biological membranes to distribute into TBW and does not bind to plasma proteins.”
Your hard-on for me is clouding your judgement
The suspect raped a 12 year old for a hour and you want to argue about the accuracy of blood tests?
GTFO
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
36 BAC, 11 minute mark. He walks fine, just not fine enough to pass the test.
The defense lawyers should be paying the morons in here for their work on this case. It’s impressive the effort they are putting in trying to discredit laboratory tests drawn at a hospital.
The girl wandered on to a highway AFTER being raped and they are questioning if she was incapacitated at the time of the rape.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:04 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Clients' own words hurt more than the BAC to me.
I'm certainly no expert. I hope you're right. I'd love to see this Washington fricker chemically (or otherwise) castrated
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:05 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:You selective reading isn’t very professional for someone who’s had “medical training” which I’m now assuming that you took a CPR class.
Let me again quote your link
quote:Holy fricking strawman batman. Thread is closed yall. Can’t discuss anything anymore because Washington is a POS.
The suspect raped a 12 year old for a hour and you want to argue about the accuracy of blood tests?
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:06 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Not to mention the Daily Mail article that states "A post-mortem revealed that Brooks had 'injuries consistent with previous sexual assault anally' as well as her injuries from the crash. So they not only raped but sodomized her as well
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 12:07 am
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:06 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
The defense lawyers should be paying the morons in here for their work on this case. It’s impressive the effort they are putting in trying to discredit laboratory tests drawn at a hospital.
The problem is they keep bringing up the same silly things that have been rehashed. Over and over again....
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:08 pm to ZootedRasta
That has already been discussed. Nobody really knows for certain what that quote means because it's so vague. It's remotely possible that she had healed scarring from a past sexual encounter. Hopefully the examining physician will be more specific in regards to that statement.
This post was edited on 1/29/23 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The BAC has been a new discussion. I learned something about the tests that I didn’t know before. 
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:10 pm to ell_13
quote:
You selective reading isn’t very professional for someone who’s had “medical training” which I’m now assuming that you took a CPR class.
I’ve quoted directly from the conclusion and main bodies of YOUR link. I’ve discredited you with your own information.
You have really embarrassed yourself here tonight and it’s only going to look worse in retrospect once all the evidence of Washington’s atrocities come to light.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:12 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Sounds like there`s going to be a battle about the BAC test when the hired guns/ hired experts come in
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:13 pm to ell_13
Yes, and JudgeHolden is trying to point out this may be a 'battle of the experts.'
It isn't .08 = legal drunk, slam dunk.
It's a "stupor" which is .3+. Madison's testing was .319 at the hospital.
But defense will have an expert saying her running shows she wasn't stupor-level drunk, nor would she be ten minutes later when the sex took place.
Judge was pointing out what the standards are, objectively.
It isn't .08 = legal drunk, slam dunk.
It's a "stupor" which is .3+. Madison's testing was .319 at the hospital.
But defense will have an expert saying her running shows she wasn't stupor-level drunk, nor would she be ten minutes later when the sex took place.
Judge was pointing out what the standards are, objectively.
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:13 pm to ell_13
quote:
The BAC has been a new discussion.
the kids clearly admitted she was wasted. That's going to be their problem regardless of how much people rage on this site..
Posted on 1/29/23 at 8:17 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
but you're making a very valid point.
That’s all I ever do.
Popular
Back to top


1


