Started By
Message

re: Delta Moves On...Cleanup Begins

Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:38 pm to
Posted by Notasnitch
Member since Dec 2017
315 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:38 pm to
That run would suck for lake charles
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29713 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:39 pm to
Not much left in Lake Charles to damage if this storm hits there. It would be the final nail in the coffin because no one would want to move back to that area after the slew of misfortune that area has had over the last twenty years.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
102064 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:39 pm to
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:39 pm to
frick thats a big move west
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29713 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

frick thats a big move west


So then its Pensacola bound.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
74953 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

frick thats a big move west

I'm thinking it could be an over correction due to the current location of Delta. It may shift back on later runs.
Posted by Notasnitch
Member since Dec 2017
315 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:41 pm to
I cant be the only dumbass that needs to Google the actual conversion from the Z time to our time for the runs?
I need half this shite dumbed down to me like talking to a 4th grade kid.
About the only thing I learned about weather is that Duke and dukke are completely opposite
Posted by NorthEndZone
Member since Dec 2008
14258 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:42 pm to
Climatology says Vermilion Bay to mouth of River is most likely for this time of year, but there were a couple of outliers near Galveston and Cameron.

Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
147069 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

About the only thing I learned about weather is that Duke and dukke are completely opposite

TD weather thread 101
Posted by treyk89
Member since Oct 2003
2264 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

A weakening major hurricane at landfall is a huge threat. Pretty significant precedent has shown that.


Agreed. In was addressing the idiot who seems to think it’s absolutely going to be a major hurricane at landfall. He’s criticizing or trolling people who disagree.
Posted by treyk89
Member since Oct 2003
2264 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

now we have idiotcasting


Let’s make it a thing.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21466 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Pretty straight forward early on as 92L will round the ridge into the Gulf. There is a weak ULL over Mexico that could play a role in the future track and strength.



Models show this ULL drifting NE as the ridge tries to build in over the top of 92L. The ridge and ULL will set the edge for the eventual turn N and then NE. How far west does 92L get before the ULL starts to erode the edge of the ridge?



The 12z GFS eventually gets the ULL far enough NE to turn 92L north and this allows for it to get picked up by the zonal flow over the top.



Models can struggle with the track and strength of ULLs more than other features. A faster NE track of the ULL could introduce shear over the system earlier and keep it wearker. A slower or more western track for the ULL could allow 92L to get farther west into the Gulf and provide an outflow channel for 92L aiding in strengthening.


This post from yesterday feels like it was a week ago...

Looking at the middle image above valid for 00z Thursday vs. the 18z run today valid for 00z Thursday. We can see that the ULL over Mexico is weaker but also notice that the trailing ULL over the Dominican is also weaker. This allows for a stronger ridge over the top. The model also greatly underestimated the strength of convection associated with Delta and that probably plays a role in the stronger ridge and weaker trailing ULL. The outflow from a stronger Delta essentially worked to weaken the trailing ULL, allowing for a stronger ridge over the top.

Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
40297 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:45 pm to
I never said it absolutely would.

I was telling the people who were saying it absolutely WOULDN’T that they’re just wishcasting.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43444 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:47 pm to
So this is actually good news right?

Ridge building over LA keeps the bad thing away?
Posted by SohCahToa
New Orleans, La
Member since Jan 2011
7786 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:48 pm to
Rds posts in these threads the way I send messages in my family group text after reading rds’ posts
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34925 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by back9Tiger
Island Coconut Salesman
Member since Nov 2005
17935 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:48 pm to
So that means?
Posted by BallsEleven
Member since Mar 2019
6163 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

That run would suck for lake charles


If it holds up on the 0z run with the recon data I'll pucker up a bit.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91836 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

frick thats a big move west


Not at all. Euro has been on that tendency.

12z



18z





Euro is big time outlier and has been for a bit.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 10/5/20 at 8:50 pm to
the great thing about Duke is he dumbs this shite down for us amateurs
Jump to page
Page First 49 50 51 52 53 ... 601
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 51 of 601Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram