2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily Mail: Noah’s Ark resting place 100% confirmed
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:21 pm to Shamoan
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:21 pm to Shamoan
quote:
so you reference an unsuccessful use of 1988 technology and dismiss cutting-edge technology as "eh, these are the same...case dismissed". ok, but that is intellectually dishonest.
I don't know why you keep calling it "unsucessful". What, exactly, do y'all think GPR is? It showed the "walls". That was a huge "discovery" for it being the Ark. Those walls were found again later with GPR, and analyzed as a natural formation (as you pointed out).
quote:
you are obviously free to do as you wish, but how do you explain the previously undiscovered structures?
They are natural formations. Just like all the other "mysterious" formations.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:24 pm to Shamoan
quote:
cutting-edge technology
quote:
previously undiscovered structures
The problem is that you’re just trusting The Daily Mail and the Noah’s Ark Scans statements. Have these things been peer reviewed? How do we know that these people know how to use the equipment and interpret the findings?
As has been pointed out, this outfit isn’t funded by any research institute. They collect donations and periodically pop up with new findings that coincidentally come along with requests for more donations. All the hallmarks of a grift.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:25 pm to gizmothepug
quote:
I think enough evidence exists from different cultures at that time that a flood happened
Floods happen every year all over the world. Their world was a much, much smaller place back then. If Amite River 2016 or the 2004 Tsunami happened back then, the stories would have been equally fantastic.
quote:
so why don’t they just excavate the thing and be done with it?
Because it will just prove that they were as wrong as the experts have said they are all along and then the gig is up. They'll have to find a new grift.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:25 pm to Salmon
its a nice bedtime story.
so he gathered 2 of every animal in the world and lived to be 950 years old.
Smart intelligent people actually believe this
so he gathered 2 of every animal in the world and lived to be 950 years old.
Smart intelligent people actually believe this
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:29 pm to gizmothepug
quote:
so why don’t they just excavate the thing and be done with it?
because its a tourists site and the Turkish government won't allow a full on excavation
there is literally a gift shop on the site now
but it definitely not a grift guys
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:30 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Smart intelligent people actually believe this
In fairness, they were indoctrinated from birth to believe that they will spend eternity in hell if they question the validity of the preacher man's claims. Generations of grifters found a way to monetize allegory through fear of the allegory itself.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:31 pm to hawgfaninc
Daddy Dale Brown was onto this shite like 35 years ago. 
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:31 pm to hawgfaninc
If it’s confirmed should be time to dig it up and show it off to the world. Right?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:31 pm to Salmon
quote:
They are natural formations.
well, if you are convinced this is something that isn't manmade, good on you.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:38 pm to Shamoan
You’re vested here despite your protestations to the contrary.
What does that picture show you?
What does that picture show you?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:39 pm to Mo Jeaux
im not saying its noah's ark. i cannot validate their findings, much like the findings that we all commonly accept without question on less controversial subjects. they could be liars and it could be a money scheme. people can do what they wish with their money. if people want to fund this research, go for it. people spend their money on all sorts of stupid and frivolous things, however, i will be interested in what their study finds and will await the findings of neutral parties as well. its best to have an open mind throughout life.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:41 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
When all is said and done, this thread will be 7-10 pages of a lot of arguments and insults with little to no open-minded discussion.
I called it on page 2.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:43 pm to Jester
quote:
they were indoctrinated from birth to believe that they will spend eternity in hell if they question the validity of the preacher man's claims.
Well, this is just unequivocally false. What you're describing is the Branch Davidians and other weird cult-like sects. Using this to describe all of Christianity is like painting with a brush as broad as the Titanic.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:43 pm to Mo Jeaux
i see structure and cells. structure of a boat? maybe, maybe not, but not something one would see in nature and certainly not something one would see on a desolate mountain top in turkey.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:44 pm to Shamoan
quote:
well, if you are convinced this is something that isn't manmade, good on you.
What do you think that scan shows? Have you ever looked at GPR scans before?
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:46 pm to PCRammer
quote:
I'd like to see some evidence that 4,300 years ago that feature was 1) at or near sea level, 2) biblical flooding that elevated the boat that high, or 3) that geologic uplift changed the elevation.
Hey now, let's not try and bring some logic and common sense into this conversation. That's not how religion works. Just have some faith that it's 100% Noah's Ark.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:47 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Well, this is just unequivocally false. What you're describing is the Branch Davidians and other weird cult-like sects. Using this to describe all of Christianity is like painting with a brush as broad as the Titanic.
It’s not just Christianity. It’s all religions. The vast majority of people stay the religion that they were raised in.
Among converts, the majority of those are people who while raised in a particular religion weren’t raised in a household that practiced the religion very devoutly. The rest are statistical anomalies.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:48 pm to Shamoan
quote:How do you know this? What is your background in the field?
but not something one would see in nature and certainly not something one would see on a desolate mountain top in turkey.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:48 pm to Shamoan
quote:
see structure and cells. structure of a boat? maybe, maybe not, but not something one would see in nature and certainly not something one would see on a desolate mountain top in turkey.
Have you ever heard or Cappadocia? It’s even in the same country.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 4:49 pm to Shamoan
quote:
i see structure and cells.
what do the blue and red colors represent?
Page 7 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News