- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: COVID-19 & Vaccines - History of Corruption, Fraud, Bio-Engineering, & Media Cover-Up
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:43 pm to hambones
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:43 pm to hambones
quote:
I’d rebuttal with my second link in OP related to under/unreported vaccine injuries and side effects.
I went through that link as well. And yes, it cites several doctors and their concerns. I have no rebuttal on those other than I'm sure I can find other doctors that could refute those concerns.
I did laugh at the use of Facebook comments as evidence of something though
When it comes to vaccine side effects, I just look at those around me, and I know plenty of people that have been vaccinated, and the worst side effect has been they felt sick for a day after. Me, personally, I had a sore arm for a day
1
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:46 pm to Dizz
quote:
This Board
"Government isn't capable of doing a god damn thing"
Also this board
"The US government orchestrated a worldwide pandemic which would require the cooperation of thousands in government and private industry and no one has said a word"
This is bigger than the US government
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:47 pm to Salmon
I mean it when I say this:
I’m really glad you and your circles’ experiences have been different than mine.
I’m really glad you and your circles’ experiences have been different than mine.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:55 pm to kisatchie53
quote:
I’m a white Biden voter
Gross
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:59 pm to hambones
Here’s the “Facebook comments” reference (the last tidbit on a large vaccine injury section of the article) that Salmon is laughing at:
Forgive me for not laughing with you. Did you find anything else in that section of the article worth noting?
Forgive me for not laughing with you. Did you find anything else in that section of the article worth noting?
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:02 pm to hambones
quote:
hambones
You're doing humanity a favor with this.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:02 pm to hambones
I'll ask you this: if the testimony from this USMC major is truthful, why haven't studies been able to prove the effectiveness of ivermectin and HCQ?
If the answer is another conspiracy cover-up, how have they been able to keep that quiet?
If the answer is another conspiracy cover-up, how have they been able to keep that quiet?
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:06 pm to CrappyPants
Ok then it involves an even larger number of people who all have manged to keep their mouths shut and not make a single mistake.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:07 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Interesting that not a single person has addressed the concerns brought up about that study in that thread.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:09 pm to Salmon
Only CUCKS dismiss that study because they heard Fauci say it on CNN! Ivermectin is the miracle cure and all other studies are funded by big pharma to exterminate the human race with a gene therapy treatment meant for bats
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:10 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Only CUCKS dismiss that study because they heard Fauci say it on CNN! Ivermectin is the miracle cure and all other studies are funded by big pharma to exterminate the human race with a gene therapy treatment meant for bats
Haha, your only strategy for arguing is straw-manning, it's insane.
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:22 pm to Ingeniero
A really really important thing to note about Ivermectin for anyone considering it for COVID treatment is this:
The few reliable studies showing any effectiveness with Ivermectin have been limited to populations in developing countries where parasitic worms are extremely common in humans. It only shows some effectiveness in these studies because people with parisitic infections are immunocompromised and at higher risk to severe Covid cases compared to people without parisitic infections. Ivermectin is treating the parisitic infection, not Covid... so unless you're living in filth, leave Ivermectin for the horses and the unfortunate folks living in unsanitary conditions elsewhere in the world.
The few reliable studies showing any effectiveness with Ivermectin have been limited to populations in developing countries where parasitic worms are extremely common in humans. It only shows some effectiveness in these studies because people with parisitic infections are immunocompromised and at higher risk to severe Covid cases compared to people without parisitic infections. Ivermectin is treating the parisitic infection, not Covid... so unless you're living in filth, leave Ivermectin for the horses and the unfortunate folks living in unsanitary conditions elsewhere in the world.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:24 pm to hambones
quote:
have a feeling he/she will be surprised upon actual review of the links. Countless MDs, PhDs, and other experts are cited. I won’t hold my breath for that poster.
Not reviewing links from sources known to be biased toward anti-vaccine. Your research exists in an echo chamber and leads you to data/articles you wish to be factual but in reality are not. My FIL is a pulmonologist who has been on the front lines of Covid from day one. If he says the vaccine is safe and effective based on his first hand knowledge and experience, then I listen to him. Not some random on an Internet forum linking to conspiracy theorist websites.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 1:25 pm to Ingeniero
Ingenerio - great questions.
I don’t have all the answers, but this seems related to the question (IVM study published in Nature, retracted under questionable reasons, and now republished on 12/21/21):
Article on what was happening with publication issues
The actual study now recently re-published in Nature
Ohio Frontline Pulmonologist on his use of Ivermectin and backlash he faced
I don’t have all the answers, but this seems related to the question (IVM study published in Nature, retracted under questionable reasons, and now republished on 12/21/21):
Article on what was happening with publication issues
The actual study now recently re-published in Nature
Ohio Frontline Pulmonologist on his use of Ivermectin and backlash he faced
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 1/19/22 at 2:03 pm to jordan21210
jordan,
You’re saying congress people, medical doctors like your FIL, nurses, PhD patent experts, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FDA, and the US. patent office are conspiracy theorists?
You’re saying congress people, medical doctors like your FIL, nurses, PhD patent experts, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FDA, and the US. patent office are conspiracy theorists?
Posted on 1/19/22 at 2:09 pm to Dizz
quote:
Ok then it involves an even larger number of people who all have manged to keep their mouths shut and not make a single mistake.
Damn DIZZ. You are dumber than shite. It is starting to come out. Slowly. They are backtracking on everything they've said for the last two years... It's trickling out like a balloon and its about to burst wide open.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 2:11 pm to hambones
Add this to the pile.
The Despicable Defamation of a Lifesaving Doctor.
The Despicable Defamation of a Lifesaving Doctor.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 2:18 pm to jordan21210
Article from Brussels Times
(Moderna is the most potent of these mRNA gene therapies)
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 1/19/22 at 2:59 pm to Bunk Moreland
Bunk, that article was new to me. Thanks for posting it.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News