- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:13 pm to Centinel
Retarded is exactly what anyone that thinks COVIDs and its timing with the 2020 Election are coincidental.
Fauci is on the record in 2017 stating that a pandemic would occur during Trump's administration.
Fauci is on the record in 2017 stating that a pandemic would occur during Trump's administration.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:15 pm to kisatchie53
??? I’m hambones.
To kisatchie:
To kisatchie:
This post was edited on 1/19/22 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:19 pm to hambones
quote:
Moderna SEC filing review - Moderna and FDA classify mRNA as “Gene Therapy”
I'll tackle this link because its patently false. The FDA classified "mRNA technology" as "gene therapy".
In the SEC filing, Moderna is saying that their mRNA technology should not be classified as "gene therapy" because of the different mechanism of action. They are complaining that the "gene therapy" label will do exactly what people are currently doing, freaking out about the "gene therapy" label
quote:
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:20 pm to hambones
Well, when you aren't studying about the man made virus that has you worried that you will be made to take a vaccine for (if you haven't yet, you probably won't), you can study on how to properly respond to someone on this board.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:23 pm to bgtiger
Test:
Hello. I’m responding to you.
Hello. I’m responding to you.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:24 pm to Ingeniero
I said:
And you proved me right by responding:
quote:
It's hilarious that you'll dismiss the scientific info in the links by straw-manning the sources.
And you proved me right by responding:
quote:
t's not scientific info. It's a bunch of bullshite. The "DARPA papers" in the OP are being pushed by pretty much only Project Veritas and they're laughably bad
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:27 pm to Salmon
quote:
I'll tackle this link because its patently false. The FDA classified "mRNA technology" as "gene therapy". In the SEC filing, Moderna is saying that their mRNA technology should not be classified as "gene therapy" because of the different mechanism of action.
So let's disregard what a health agency says and go by what the company producing it filed it as on it's Securities Exchange paperwork...
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:28 pm to Salmon
Salmon,
I really appreciate your rebuttal. I’m dead serious.
So it’s classified as “gene therapy” and Moderna doesn’t want it to be?
Because this gene therapy doesn’t have the side effects of most other mRNA gene therapies?
I’m not playing dumb here. Just genuinely trying to understand.
I’d rebuttal with my second link in OP related to under/unreported vaccine injuries and side effects.
I really appreciate your rebuttal. I’m dead serious.
So it’s classified as “gene therapy” and Moderna doesn’t want it to be?
Because this gene therapy doesn’t have the side effects of most other mRNA gene therapies?
I’m not playing dumb here. Just genuinely trying to understand.
I’d rebuttal with my second link in OP related to under/unreported vaccine injuries and side effects.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:30 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
So let's disregard what a health agency says and go by what the company producing it filed it as on it's Securities Exchange paperwork...
You can do whatever you wish. I give zero shits.
My only point was the Moderna did not classify "mRNA" as "gene therapy", which is what the OP was claiming
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:30 pm to hambones
(and the fact that it is currently classified by the FDA as gene therapy - unless someone has an update on that classification)
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:31 pm to CrappyPants
quote:
If they can do something like this and screw the world, what else can they do?
This Board
"Government isn't capable of doing a god damn thing"
Also this board
"The US government orchestrated a worldwide pandemic which would require the cooperation of thousands in government and private industry and no one has said a word"
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:32 pm to Salmon
Salmon, I updated the link description in the OP thanks to your rebuttal. FDA classifies as gene therapy.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:33 pm to hambones
quote:
So it’s classified as “gene therapy” and Moderna doesn’t want it to be?
Yes. And their justification is that it is an entirely different mechanism of action.
quote:
Because this gene therapy doesn’t have the side effects of most other mRNA gene therapies?
well that's a leading question They don't want it associated with "gene therapy" due to the negative connotation of "gene therapy" and side effects sometimes associated with gene therapy drugs, which may or may not be associated with mRNA
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:34 pm to Salmon
You actually did him a favor.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:35 pm to Centinel
quote:
Says the most rabid Masked Covidian on this forum
I post once or a twice a day on this board, but you average 7500 posts a year. Maybe you should look in the mirror.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:35 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
I'm not strawmanning anything. I'm saying the "report" has no basis in reality. It's a nonsense report and because of that, it hasn't been picked up by a single reputable outlet.
It says that ivermectin and HCQ work on this "vaccine virus" but somehow, studies have repeatedly found this isn't true.
It straight up says that the US created the virus. Not funded, not helped research; created.
It's a poorly written jumbled up conspiracy theorist rant.
It says that ivermectin and HCQ work on this "vaccine virus" but somehow, studies have repeatedly found this isn't true.
It straight up says that the US created the virus. Not funded, not helped research; created.
It's a poorly written jumbled up conspiracy theorist rant.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:38 pm to Ingeniero
It cites testimony/communications from a Major in the USMC. It’s corroborated by others cited in the OP. As also cited, congress people want answers about this information.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:41 pm to hambones
Bro, he doesn't care. He needs "reputable sources" to tell him what to believe. Just give it time and it'll be in corporate news, then rub his face in it.
Posted on 1/19/22 at 12:42 pm to Salmon
Studies show the unique mechanism of action in the vaccine to have inflammatory side effects as cited in the second link.
Here’s a snippet from that second article with sources cited:
Here’s a snippet from that second article with sources cited:
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News