- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Couple must pay nearly $600G for removing oak tree from their property
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:14 pm to real turf fan
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:14 pm to real turf fan
quote:
Isn't it also illegal to catch rainwater on your own property in Cali
quote:Its either a federal law or a law in a lot of states
It is in some counties according to some gardening friends of mine.
0
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:32 pm to ForeverLSU02
And yet ironically people are shitting in the streets of San Francisco and nobody cares.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:37 pm to Geauxld Finger
quote:. I am in Tangipahoa and I have 5 giant oaks on my property. A neighbor who works in some compactly for the forestry told me not too long after he moved by me that I better not cut the trees down. I laughed at him, I have no intentions to ever do that, it devalues the land. But if I wanted to I would do it and not think twice.
There are situations in Louisiana where this could happen. Try cutting down a live oak in st Tammany without sucking off the Parish
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
600k for moving a tree
Anyone thinking that's reasonable is an idiot.
Anyone that reads the article and this thread and thinks that is all that happened is an idiot.
It is always the smuggest posters that are incapable of dealing with a simple fact pattern, you are certainly entitled to an opinion the fine was excessive but changing the fact pattern to meet your agenda is lame and weak minded.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:23 pm to ccomeaux
quote:
The tree, two others they removed and a dozen others along a previously undisturbed path they bulldozed died, along with surrounding vegetation.
From the article.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:27 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
180-year-old heritage oak tree
I'll agree with the judge on this one. A 180 yr old tree can't be replaced. Well at least not for 180 more years.
Hammer these smarmy fricks.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:45 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
changing the fact pattern to meet your agenda is lame and weak minded.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:50 pm to Geauxld Finger
quote:Too easy. Sprinkle a little Spike and move on.
There are situations in Louisiana where this could happen. Try cutting down a live oak in st Tammany without sucking off the Parish
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:51 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:It’s a phuckin tree. Trees have life expectancies too and that one’s days were numbered.
I'll agree with the judge on this one. A 180 yr old tree can't be replaced. Well at least not for 180 more years.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 4:55 pm to iron banks
quote:
Wow a tree is worth more than the average citizens life.
Sez who?
There are no human lives at risk in the story. There is nothing about buying selling or estimated value.
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 5:01 pm to tigerpimpbot
Probably a couple of arrogant Baby Boomers who feel like the rules don't apply to them.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News