- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:49 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:49 pm to Darth_Vader
Given its prevalence to aggressively affect those people 60+ you would think the 60+ in this thread would be more concerned.


Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:52 pm to fishfighter
quote:
So 6 people are dead now in the US. I'm sure there will be more.
Considering several of those 6 are from the same nursing home, that's not a bold statement. This damn virus is likely going to take several more just from that nursing home.
quote:
Are they accounting for those who don't report that they have it and just get better on their own???
Wouldn't that drive the mortality rate down????
I saw this yesterday on Reddit:
quote:
The top virologist in Germany (partly responsible for sequencing the genome of the virus and heavily involved in many current research efforts) says that the purported CFR of 2-3% is definitely too high and not what they base their models and work on. He says that public entities (such as the German equivalent of the CDC) have to report rates and proportions based on the officially known numbers, but private researches like himself are able to 'clean' the data to get a much more realistic picture. In order to get a true idea of the CFR, they exclude all Chinese numbers (unreliable for multiple reasons, including that almost only those seeking medical care have been tested), as well as all Iranian and at least for now the Italian numbers (they are absolutely certain that in both these countries cases are vastly underreported, and the first infections inly surfaced after post-mortem examinations, when the first deaths happened, based on probably already hundreds if not thousands of cases). The much more realistic CFR is most certainly below 0.5%, he says.
Source: Interviews on NDR Podcast
I posted what I think was the referenced podcast in one of my earlier posts but I can't verify it was I don't speak German. So, like most things on the internet, take it with a grain of salt.
This post was edited on 3/2/20 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:52 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
You realize the vast majority of healthy people who get it won’t need a hospital right?
Right. This was never going to be an apocalyptic virus, and no one who has a clue claimed it might be.
But one place where this virus seems to exceed the flu is for older people, with mortality in the double digits in Italy, SK, and a similar effect here so far.
But let’s say not a single person below the age of 60 needs ANY medical attention. That still leaves ~72 million US citizens. Let’s say only 1 out of every 4 even becomes exposed to the virus, and of that group, only 5% need hospitalization.
That’s over 900k critically ill.
The entire country has around 90k staffed hospital beds, with only around 70k ventilators.
That has always been the danger with novel viruses. Even if it has a clinical attack rate similar to the flu, they have a tendency to spread like wildfire and overwhelm the medical infrastructure as opposed to the seasonal flu doing a slow burn over a year.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:53 pm to NYNolaguy1
I'm sure that Chinese center for disease control is putting out firm accurate numbers

Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:53 pm to NYNolaguy1
That is a bit misleading because the elderly are not as overall healthy on average as the rest of the population.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:53 pm to lakeviewtiger
quote:
read an article that India hasn't been forthcoming with data. The US and others have actually essentially been using spies to mine data regarding the virus in INdia.
Damn. That is interesting.
Imagine the virus hitting this:

Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:55 pm to Volvagia
quote:
That’s over 900k critically ill.
The entire country has around 90k staffed hospital beds, with only around 70k ventilators.
They wouldn't all get sick at the same time.
It would happen over months and months.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:55 pm to Slingin Pickle
quote:
I'm sure that Chinese center for disease control is putting out firm accurate numbers
Well, we're seeing that a majority of the victims in Italy and Japan are elderly and with underlying medical conditions (at least the ones I can find).
So there is some verification of the data shared by the Chinese CDC.
This post was edited on 3/2/20 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:57 pm to Ignignot
There are about 7400 current cases in the serious/critical category (across the world)
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:57 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
That is a bit misleading because the elderly are not as overall healthy on average as the rest of the population.
Which is exactly why it would affect them more, no?
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:58 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
There are about 7400 current cases in the serious/critical category (across the world)
Worldometers - Coronavirus
41,513
Currently Infected Patients
34,115 (82%)
in Mild Condition
7,398 (18%)
Serious or Critical
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:58 pm to Slingin Pickle
quote:
I'm sure that Chinese center for disease control is putting out firm accurate numbers
So you think the actual mortality stats are higher or lower than that number?
This post was edited on 3/2/20 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:59 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Australian health officials are meeting today to consider additional measures to stop the spread of coronavirus, including a possible ban on large gatherings and asking people to work from home - ABC, citing sources
quote:
Kirkland, Washington: "Some of our [27] firefighters in quarantine are demonstrating flu like symptoms."
This post was edited on 3/2/20 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 3/2/20 at 2:59 pm to GEAUXmedic
Another new country:
quote:
BREAKING: Morocco reports first case of coronavirus
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:02 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
That we know of. Considering the vast majority of people who get it never have symptoms worse than a common cold, there is no way to verify someone didn’t bring it in earlier without knowing they had it.
I don’t mind the ignorant. If they are intellectually honest they can often catch things that are otherwise overlooked and they have been assets and good conversation in this thread.
It’s frustrating however dealing with people who have zero knowledge of the situation, but somehow form opinions of what should happen and what is possible and what isn’t.
They have done phylogenetic trees of the virus. While there is a still open (but very rapidly closing) window of what you say to be possible, the viral substrain in Washington couldn’t have come over much earlier than Jan 15, because it has mutations in common with Chinese strains around that time. If it came earlier like you hypothesize, it wouldn’t have common mutations that emerged in China after the split.
That’s hard science, not opinion or guesswork.
They are currently tracking 4 infection lineages in the US last I heard, and they can approximate arrival by this method even if they don’t have the contact tracing of individuals mapped out.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:03 pm to NYNolaguy1
Yep, I fall in that 60+ with heart failure. 
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:04 pm to TheCaterpillar
I've actually been worried about India.
Disgusting sanitation, extremely poor cleaning habits, over a billion people, extremely stacked communities, huge airports that link all over the world, no quarantine yet.
Disgusting sanitation, extremely poor cleaning habits, over a billion people, extremely stacked communities, huge airports that link all over the world, no quarantine yet.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:06 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
They wouldn't all get sick at the same time.
It would happen over months and months.
Agreed. But given the potentially generous parameters used to get to that number, the fact that people who get a bed tend to stay there for 3-6 weeks, and the extreme difference between possible critically ill and available beds...all point to a concerning contrast to the painting those two want to display.
It was just an illustrative example, not a model of what is expected to happen.
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:08 pm to tigerfan88
quote:
You realize the vast majority of healthy people who get it won’t know they had it because they just dealt with it at home like the flu?
FIFY
Posted on 3/2/20 at 3:10 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
I don't know why people downvote this.
Because they anti-wishcasters are just as bad as they think the "wishcasters" are.
Popular
Back to top


3





