Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 5/10/20 at 6:02 pm to
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 5/10/20 at 6:02 pm to
Exactly how convincing would the data have to be for the Surgeon General to make a PSA telling everyone to light ‘em up? Because we need to get to that point.

I’m not a smoker but that would make my quarantine.



Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:09 am to
I'm sure smoke is still bad. They just mean nicotine could help, right?

There are patches that can do that.
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6795 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I’m not a smoker but that would make my quarantine.
Trading the chance at getting a cough with a less than .5% mortality rate, for a chance at a cancer with a 83% mortality rate.

Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3211 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Trading the chance at getting a cough with a less than .5% mortality rate, for a chance at a cancer with a 83% mortality rate.


This is about more than that. I'm not saying I would pick up smoking, but I'd be entertained as heck watching the chaos and seeing officials struggle to narrate positions that go against what they're expected to say.

This is also about trading those dumb arse "The Truth" anti-smoking commercials with Mad-Men style pro tobacco commercials. A sudden resurgence of the Marlboro Man would be more entertaining than some half-arsed attempt to keep kids from vaping.

The only thing better would be if the cure ended up being a 50/50 mix street meth and heroin.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

dumb arse "The Truth" anti-smoking commercials


I think they're pretty damn effective and before vaping hit the country, I think the data proved that.

It would be a good thing for everyone's wallet (except tobacco workers) if everyone in this country stopped smoking. Much higher rates of smoking in low socio-economic demographics i.e. "uninsured". Who do you think picks up their medical bills?

Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40966 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 9:57 am to
Everyone gets it twisted with nicotine.

Nicotine doesn't do shite, it just makes you want to smoke.

It's the other shite that kills ya.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21139 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 11:21 am to
It's possible that something besides nicotine is having an impact. But if nicotine does prevent infection or slow the progression of the disease, what we still won't know is if a patch works, because it's obviously not delivering the nicotine to the body in the same way as smoking and vaping do. I would love for the French nicotine patch study to produce a positive result.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25958 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 12:45 pm to
Some of the media waking up? BBC report asking if their government is still "following the science" (12+ minutes).

Somewhat of a jab at Boris Johnson there for a bit, but otherwise I think it's a step in the right direction.
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25958 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:04 pm to
And the counting/reporting of non-CoviD, excess deaths due to not seeking treatment begins. Reuters report covering CDC data out of New York showing 22% of the excess deaths that have happened in New York since March are non-CoviD deaths.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29128 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

And the counting/reporting of non-CoviD, excess deaths due to not seeking treatment begins. Reuters report covering CDC data out of New York showing 22% of the excess deaths that have happened in New York since March are non-CoviD deaths.
Important nitpick... have not been identified as covid deaths.
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11594 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

There are patches that can do that.


And pouches.
Posted by Higgysmalls
Ft Lauderdale
Member since Jun 2016
8004 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 5:39 pm to
my sense of smell is starting to come back today after 4 days. Time for a celebration poop to get the senses going
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
15252 posts
Posted on 5/11/20 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Much higher rates of smoking in low socio-economic demographics i.e. "uninsured". Who do you think picks up their medical bills?



State Government would go broke if they lost that sin tax. That tax is not to encourage people to stop smoking anymore than the billions of dollar settlement the tobacco companies paid was to be used to pay health costs.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61773 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:56 am to
Looking for a little help to provide some rebuttals. Some of the negative Nancy's are still talking about the fear of second round of deadly corona because we are opening up to soon.
What is a good reference to share with them that this is highly unlikely? I've tried already stating the obvious that staying shutdown won't make the virus disappear.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

What is a good reference to share with them that this is highly unlikely?


Probably doesn't exist because it is so likely it is almost inevitable- whether we open up now or in two months
Posted by MarcusQuinn
Member since Aug 2005
582 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:17 am to
The virus is still around. If people interact more, spread and cases should inevitably increase.There will be some benefit from lower Rt, increased testing, increased awareness, etc. And mayyyybe weather. But why would cases not increase as interaction increases? Fear of a second wave, of some degree, isn’t being negative, it’s being realistic.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61773 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:28 am to
I get that. It’s more just my frustration with those that are saying things need to stay shutdown because if we open now cases are going to skyrocket and could be worse than the first round
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46635 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Fear of a second wave, of some degree, isn’t being negative, it’s being realistic.



It's not being realistic...it's being emotional. If you're over 75, have respiratory or immune issues, etc. I can understand the fear. For that group it is justified. Somewhat.

For the overwhelming majority of this country? The fear is completely unfounded and in no way a rational response based on the facts.

Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40145 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Looking for a little help to provide some rebuttals. Some of the negative Nancy's are still talking about the fear of second round of deadly corona because we are opening up to soon.
What is a good reference to share with them that this is highly unlikely? I've tried already stating the obvious that staying shutdown won't make the virus disappear.

Confirmation bias 101. Lmao
Posted by Stevo
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
12562 posts
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Trading the chance at getting a cough with a less than .5% mortality rate


Link? Would love to show this to a colleague.
first pageprev pagePage 1099 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram